Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Most annoying and or dumbest of the CDBros?
Comments
-
CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)
Nailed itPitchfork51 said:
-
HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)
Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.MikeDamone said:
Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.HHusky said:
I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?MikeDamone said:
I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.GDS said:
Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.Swaye said:
@GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.MikeDamone said:
Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industriesSFGbob said:
You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.YellowSnow said:
My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.SFGbob said:
Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.RaceBannon said:
Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
HHusky. Dumb as ever.
-
CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)
The Federal government certainly considers it high income.HHusky said:
Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.MikeDamone said:
Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.HHusky said:
I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?MikeDamone said:
I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.GDS said:
Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.Swaye said:
@GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.MikeDamone said:
Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industriesSFGbob said:
You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.YellowSnow said:
My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.SFGbob said:
Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.RaceBannon said:
Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
HHusky. Dumb as ever. -
HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)
That must make you feel better about yourself.SFGbob said:
The Federal government certainly considers it high income.HHusky said:
Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.MikeDamone said:
Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.HHusky said:
I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?MikeDamone said:
I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.GDS said:
Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.Swaye said:
@GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.MikeDamone said:
Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industriesSFGbob said:
You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.YellowSnow said:
My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.SFGbob said:
Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.RaceBannon said:
Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
HHusky. Dumb as ever. -
CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)HH is the big gun at Dewey, Cheatem and Howe.
-
CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)
Just admit you were wrong. JFC. This isn't saying 200,000 is high income. It says that people having kids are low income. The opposite of what your dumb ass said.HHusky said:
Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.MikeDamone said:
Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.HHusky said:
I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?MikeDamone said:
I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.GDS said:
Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.Swaye said:
@GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.MikeDamone said:
Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industriesSFGbob said:
You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.YellowSnow said:
My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.SFGbob said:
Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.RaceBannon said:
Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
HHusky. Dumb as ever.
" What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?" - HHuskyFS -
CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)
Sorry I don't speak Kunt.HHusky said:
That must make you feel better about yourself.SFGbob said:
The Federal government certainly considers it high income.HHusky said:
Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.MikeDamone said:
Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.HHusky said:
I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?MikeDamone said:
I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.GDS said:
Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.Swaye said:
@GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.MikeDamone said:
Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industriesSFGbob said:
You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.YellowSnow said:
My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.SFGbob said:
Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.RaceBannon said:
Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
HHusky. Dumb as ever.
You certainly have no problem with the Federal Government seeing people with $200,000 in income as rich. In fact, you advocate we increase taxes on these "rich" people and you opposed the move to cut their taxes.
They are "rich" when you want to tax them but for the purposes of the argument you're in now you deny they are rich. Do you feel better about yourself when you're such a hypocritical Kunt O'Keefed? -
HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)
$200,000 annual household income isn’t “the wealthy”. US fertility rates are in the dumpster and to the extent we use income as a proxy for wealth, $200,000 doesn’t really cut it. Your exploration of birth rates within the non-wealthy population doesn’t refute what demographers have noticed about the fertility rates of the wealthy.MikeDamone said:
Just admit you were wrong. JFC. This isn't saying 200,000 is high income. It says that people having kids are low income. The opposite of what your dumb ass said.HHusky said:
Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.MikeDamone said:
Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.HHusky said:
I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?MikeDamone said:
I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.GDS said:
Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.Swaye said:
@GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.MikeDamone said:
Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industriesSFGbob said:
You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.YellowSnow said:
My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.SFGbob said:
Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.RaceBannon said:
Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
HHusky. Dumb as ever.
" What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?" - HHuskyFS -
CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)
And your a fucking idiot. Even if the wealthy had a high birth rate the number of wealthy by your definition is tiny. Would hardly make a dent in the birth rate of lower income.HHusky said:
$200,000 annual household income isn’t “the wealthy”. US fertility rates are in the dumpster and to the extent we use income as a proxy for wealth, $200,000 doesn’t really cut it. Your exploration of birth rates within the non-wealthy population doesn’t refute what demographers have noticed about the fertility rates of the wealthy.MikeDamone said:
Just admit you were wrong. JFC. This isn't saying 200,000 is high income. It says that people having kids are low income. The opposite of what your dumb ass said.HHusky said:
Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.MikeDamone said:
Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.HHusky said:
I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?MikeDamone said:
I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.GDS said:
Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.Swaye said:
@GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.MikeDamone said:
Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industriesSFGbob said:
You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.YellowSnow said:
My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.SFGbob said:
Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.RaceBannon said:
Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
HHusky. Dumb as ever.
" What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?" - HHuskyFS
Take the L and move on. Or post up a link that says "outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?". Lying piece of shit. -
HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)
Take the L when you’re making my very point? You don’t seem to know how this works.MikeDamone said:
And your a fucking idiot. Even if the wealthy had a high birth rate the number of wealthy by your definition is tiny. Would hardly make a dent in the birth rate of lower income.HHusky said:
$200,000 annual household income isn’t “the wealthy”. US fertility rates are in the dumpster and to the extent we use income as a proxy for wealth, $200,000 doesn’t really cut it. Your exploration of birth rates within the non-wealthy population doesn’t refute what demographers have noticed about the fertility rates of the wealthy.MikeDamone said:
Just admit you were wrong. JFC. This isn't saying 200,000 is high income. It says that people having kids are low income. The opposite of what your dumb ass said.HHusky said:
Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.MikeDamone said:
Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.HHusky said:
I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?MikeDamone said:
I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.GDS said:
Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.Swaye said:
@GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.MikeDamone said:
Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industriesSFGbob said:
You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.YellowSnow said:
My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.SFGbob said:
Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.RaceBannon said:
Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
HHusky. Dumb as ever.
" What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?" - HHuskyFS
Take the L and move on. Or post up a link that says "outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?". Lying piece of shit.
