Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Most annoying and or dumbest of the CDBros?

135

Comments

  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    GDS (Maybe the dumbest American who owns and can operate a computer and or mobile device)

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    Agree. The market, as it usually does, sorts this one out just fine. FMLA does enough to protect your job. No need to mandate going any further.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,904
    HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,931 Founders Club
    GDS (Maybe the dumbest American who owns and can operate a computer and or mobile device)
    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    We need to raise taxes
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,904
    HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)

    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    We need to raise taxes
    You’re awful close to your gruel and applesauce years to be this cavalier about where we’re going to find your nursing home assistants.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,931 Founders Club
    GDS (Maybe the dumbest American who owns and can operate a computer and or mobile device)
    So I was right? Raising taxes is the key?

    It's pretty much a one size fits all solution to all of our problems
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,904
    HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)

    So I was right? Raising taxes is the key?

    It's pretty much a one size fits all solution to all of our problems

    And he’s a Washington man too. Disappointing, but it used to be easier to get in.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,931 Founders Club
    GDS (Maybe the dumbest American who owns and can operate a computer and or mobile device)
    Ok we need to lower taxes so working people have more time and money to have kids


    Needing two incomes to stay where one used to work is the issue
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,904
    edited December 2019
    HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)

    Ok we need to lower taxes so working people have more time and money to have kids


    Needing two incomes to stay where one used to work is the issue

    That’s not as targeted as good old fashioned exemptions for dependents. Those were ridiculously low even back when you and I had young kids. More generous exemptions could help.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,931 Founders Club
    GDS (Maybe the dumbest American who owns and can operate a computer and or mobile device)
    I'm not opposed to exemptions

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,789 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)
    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    Climate change. This hoax scares people and they don't want to bring children into a world ending in 10 years. That and fag sex education in kindergarten.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,904
    HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    Climate change. This hoax scares people and they don't want to bring children into a world ending in 10 years. That and fag sex education in kindergarten.
    Yet, those upper income “elites” are still having kids. The explanation is economic. Same as it ever was.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    GDS (Maybe the dumbest American who owns and can operate a computer and or mobile device)
    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    But what about your Dog?
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    GDS (Maybe the dumbest American who owns and can operate a computer and or mobile device)
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    We need to raise taxes
    You’re awful close to your gruel and applesauce years to be this cavalier about where we’re going to find your nursing home assistants.
    Race lives in California, I’m sure He has picked up some Spanish along the way. He’ll be fine.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,789 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,735 Founders Club
    Ghost of MariotaisGawd (Who?)
    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    We should be doing nothing.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    APAG (TDS self immolation)
    Remove women from the workplace. Case closed

    Problem solved


    Now is it a good solution? No. But it would sure as hell work overnight.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Remove women from the workplace. Case closed

    Problem solved


    Now is it a good solution? No. But it would sure as hell work overnight.

    That was a great episode of the Handmaidens Tale
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.

    HHusky. Dumb as ever.


    Idiocracy become life...
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)


    Nailed it
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,904
    HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)

    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.

    HHusky. Dumb as ever.


    Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.

    HHusky. Dumb as ever.


    Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.
    The Federal government certainly considers it high income.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,904
    HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.

    HHusky. Dumb as ever.


    Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.
    The Federal government certainly considers it high income.
    That must make you feel better about yourself.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,789 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)
    HH is the big gun at Dewey, Cheatem and Howe.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited December 2019
    CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.

    HHusky. Dumb as ever.


    Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.
    Just admit you were wrong. JFC. This isn't saying 200,000 is high income. It says that people having kids are low income. The opposite of what your dumb ass said.

    " What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?" - HHuskyFS
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited December 2019
    CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.

    HHusky. Dumb as ever.


    Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.
    The Federal government certainly considers it high income.
    That must make you feel better about yourself.
    Sorry I don't speak Kunt.


    You certainly have no problem with the Federal Government seeing people with $200,000 in income as rich. In fact, you advocate we increase taxes on these "rich" people and you opposed the move to cut their taxes.

    They are "rich" when you want to tax them but for the purposes of the argument you're in now you deny they are rich. Do you feel better about yourself when you're such a hypocritical Kunt O'Keefed?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,904
    edited December 2019
    HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.

    HHusky. Dumb as ever.


    Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.
    Just admit you were wrong. JFC. This isn't saying 200,000 is high income. It says that people having kids are low income. The opposite of what your dumb ass said.

    " What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?" - HHuskyFS
    $200,000 annual household income isn’t “the wealthy”. US fertility rates are in the dumpster and to the extent we use income as a proxy for wealth, $200,000 doesn’t really cut it. Your exploration of birth rates within the non-wealthy population doesn’t refute what demographers have noticed about the fertility rates of the wealthy.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited December 2019
    CirrhosisDawg (The King of TDS?)
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.

    HHusky. Dumb as ever.


    Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.
    Just admit you were wrong. JFC. This isn't saying 200,000 is high income. It says that people having kids are low income. The opposite of what your dumb ass said.

    " What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?" - HHuskyFS
    $200,000 annual household income isn’t “the wealthy”. US fertility rates are in the dumpster and to the extent we use income as a proxy for wealth, $200,000 doesn’t really cut it. Your exploration of birth rates within the non-wealthy population doesn’t refute what demographers have noticed about the fertility rates of the wealthy.
    And your a fucking idiot. Even if the wealthy had a high birth rate the number of wealthy by your definition is tiny. Would hardly make a dent in the birth rate of lower income.
    Take the L and move on. Or post up a link that says "outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?". Lying piece of shit.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,904
    HHusky (Lawyer. Enuff said. Sorry Creepy you swarthy bastard)

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    GDS said:

    Swaye said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Odd because the company I work for has six weeks of paid parental leave and they didn't do it because of the government. The market created a competition for labor that necessitated the need to offer that as a benefit in order to attract the level of employee they were looking for. There was no government involvement needed.
    My wife got 22 weeks of company paid leave for our 1st kid.
    You must work for the government. Nobody in the private sector offers that kind of benefit, the market wouldn't allow it.
    Some do. Tech companies like AirBnB. Competition for workers is fierce in some industries
    @GDS you should look into AirBnB that way when you and your husband adopt you can get some good tim off to go on social media and show off your new Korean baby.
    Had 12 weeks paid paternity leave when each of my kids were born.
    I had a few days off. That was fine. JFC. People have had kids since the beginning of people. Billions and billions have been born. Now all a sudden it's a human right that parents take 6 months off and get paid for it. Through 99.99% of human history people had kids and got back to work. Now it's some sacred miracle that people seem to think they are the only ones to ever do it.

    Fine with me if companies want to offer it as benefit. But it's not a right and not a government function. If you want kids figure your own shit out.
    I don’t think it’s a right. That said, the incentives to have kids these days are small and the disincentives are large. What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?
    Lol. So outside the wealthy Americans aren't having kids? Christ. It's the fucking opposite dumbass. They poor are shitting out more than ever. The middle end upper class isn't.

    HHusky. Dumb as ever.


    Imagine thinking high income is $200,000. Yes Mikey, the traditional relationship between income and fertility holds true for the incomes you’re talking about.
    Just admit you were wrong. JFC. This isn't saying 200,000 is high income. It says that people having kids are low income. The opposite of what your dumb ass said.

    " What, if anything, should we be doing to address the fact that outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?" - HHuskyFS
    $200,000 annual household income isn’t “the wealthy”. US fertility rates are in the dumpster and to the extent we use income as a proxy for wealth, $200,000 doesn’t really cut it. Your exploration of birth rates within the non-wealthy population doesn’t refute what demographers have noticed about the fertility rates of the wealthy.
    And your a fucking idiot. Even if the wealthy had a high birth rate the number of wealthy by your definition is tiny. Would hardly make a dent in the birth rate of lower income.
    Take the L and move on. Or post up a link that says "outside of the wealthy, Americans of child bearing years aren’t having kids?". Lying piece of shit.
    Take the L when you’re making my very point? You don’t seem to know how this works.