Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Leftards lie and love to be lied to

WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,713 Standard Supporter
in Tug Tavern
Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    WestlinnDuck said:

    Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
    WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
    Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
    HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
    That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

    This post epitomizes the tug.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,795 Swaye's Wigwam
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
    WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
    Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
    HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
    That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

    This post epitomizes the tug.
    You epitomize the left.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,713 Standard Supporter
    Conservatives seek the truth, leftards lie and love to be lied to. Whether it's the Tug or the NY Times - doesn't matter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
    WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
    Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
    HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
    That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

    This post epitomizes the tug.
    You epitomize the left.
    Interesting. How, specifically?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
    WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
    Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
    HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
    That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

    This post epitomizes the tug.
    You epitomize the left.
    Interesting. How, specifically?
    Fat and stupid
    I’m not trump.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,713 Standard Supporter
    And fat and stupid PIPS also wears diapers and isn't president. Thank God.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,795 Swaye's Wigwam
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
    WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
    Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
    HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
    That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

    This post epitomizes the tug.
    You epitomize the left.
    Interesting. How, specifically?
    Not very intelligent. Sensitive.

    Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,693 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
    WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
    Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
    HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
    That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

    This post epitomizes the tug.
    You epitomize the left.
    Interesting. How, specifically?
    Fat and stupid
    I’m not trump.
    We know

    Trump is successful and the leader of the free world

    You rip off immigrants at the check cash joint


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
    WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
    Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
    HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
    That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

    This post epitomizes the tug.
    You epitomize the left.
    Interesting. How, specifically?
    Not very intelligent. Sensitive.

    Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
    Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:

    Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?

    Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?

    Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,713 Standard Supporter
    Can a dem impede or even care about chicom IP theft?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,713 Standard Supporter
    Dems sure want to impede fracking and private insurance.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,795 Swaye's Wigwam
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
    WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
    Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
    HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
    That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

    This post epitomizes the tug.
    You epitomize the left.
    Interesting. How, specifically?
    Not very intelligent. Sensitive.

    Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
    Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:

    Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?

    Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?

    Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?
    No, technology, no

    There, I played your dumb little game

    These hearings =/= impeachment

    Kill yourself
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
    WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
    Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
    HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
    That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

    This post epitomizes the tug.
    You epitomize the left.
    Interesting. How, specifically?
    Not very intelligent. Sensitive.

    Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
    Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:

    Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?

    Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?

    Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?
    No, technology, no

    There, I played your dumb little game

    These hearings =/= impeachment

    Kill yourself
    Don’t run away all frustrated and mad.

    So you think tariffs are not taxes on US consumers. Who pays them then?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,795 Swaye's Wigwam
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
    WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
    Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
    HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
    That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

    This post epitomizes the tug.
    You epitomize the left.
    Interesting. How, specifically?
    Not very intelligent. Sensitive.

    Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
    Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:

    Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?

    Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?

    Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?
    No, technology, no

    There, I played your dumb little game

    These hearings =/= impeachment

    Kill yourself
    Don’t run away all frustrated and mad.

    So you think tariffs are not taxes on US consumers. Who pays them then?
    Country's being tariffed pay tariffs.

    Let me guess, youre anti-tariff? Interesting.

    Fucking Chinese communist
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Os course, being a leftard dem law professor from Harvard is all that you need to convince other leftards of the legitimacy of their strong feelings. While it seems like a lot of attorneys lie, it generally is localized to leftards. Turley is a dem, but has some residual honesty. Give him time.
    WATCH: LAW PROF. DESTROYS DEMOCRAT CLAIM THAT TRUMP’S UKRAINE CALL WAS ‘BRIBERY.’
    Related: George Washington University Law School Prof. Jonathan Turley “flips the Dem argument on impeachment on its head: ‘If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power. You’re doing exactly what you’re criticizing the president of doing.’”
    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/
    HARVARD LAW PROF TELLS A BIG FAT ONE: House Judiciary Committee Democrats led their hearing this morning with Harvard’s Noah Feldman. Later in the day under intense questioning by Rep. Matthew Gaetz (R-Flor.), Feldman claimed he “was an impeachment skeptic before July 25.”
    That’s a flat-out misrepresentation by Feldman of his views because he was among the early advocates of impeachment, beginning March 7, 2017, barely six weeks after President Donald Trump’s inauguration. See three more examples in 2017 and 2018 of Feldman clearly pushing impeachment of Trump: here, here and here.

    This post epitomizes the tug.
    You epitomize the left.
    Interesting. How, specifically?
    Not very intelligent. Sensitive.

    Resorts to repeating things with no factual backing like "enjoy the impeachment"
    Trump’s getting impeached is a factual statement. You’re not enjoying it? I was expecting an intelligent reply. Let’s start here:

    Are tariffs taxes on US consumers?

    Greater addition to US GDP growth and prosperity: technology, entertainment & finance, or manufacturing?

    Can trumpism impede the flow of money, labor, goods and services to their highest and best use?
    No, technology, no

    There, I played your dumb little game

    These hearings =/= impeachment

    Kill yourself
    Don’t run away all frustrated and mad.

    So you think tariffs are not taxes on US consumers. Who pays them then?
    Country's being tariffed pay tariffs.

    Let me guess, youre anti-tariff? Interesting.

    Fucking Chinese communist

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    PGOS believed Husky Stadium was going to be a pea patch.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,795 Swaye's Wigwam
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PGOS believed Husky Stadium was going to be a pea patch.

    Nah, just that the remodel wouldn't go through

    Great libtard pivot as always
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    PGOS believed Husky Stadium was going to be a pea patch.

    Nah, just that the remodel wouldn't go through

    Great libtard pivot as always
    Not a pivot. You were an imbecile 10 years ago. You’re a retard today. There’s no difference between the pea patch and trump’s tariffs. They are both things stupid people believe.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.