Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Imagine having a mancrush on this loser

135

Comments

  • DoogWhisperer
    DoogWhisperer Member Posts: 1,035
    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery

    He's Sean McGrew in an offense that creates space for the RB.

    He would be third or fourth on our depth here.

    Rather easily.
    Come on now. He’s a try hard little white RB, but he’s much better than our try hard little white RB.

    I’m surprised Pete didn’t recruit him tbh.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    DerekJohnson said:

    Neighbor2972 said:

    Borghi is fine, but running backs don't matter, especially when you don't run.

    Coug players are always overrated when the scheme works, and its really not their fault when it doesn't work. Leach making 0 changes in 7 years gives his players no chance to succeed, I would feel bad for them if they didn't make fools of themselves every year talking shit.

    Same as it ever was. In 1987 Tim Rosenbach said the Huskies were better dancers than they were hitters. Even though Washington won 34-19

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    DoogWhisperer said:

    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery

    He's Sean McGrew in an offense that creates space for the RB.

    He would be third or fourth on our depth here.

    Rather easily.
    Come on now. He’s a try hard little white RB, but he’s much better than our try hard little white RB.

    I’m surprised Pete didn’t recruit him tbh.
    McGrew would be well over 81% as effective in that system
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jhfstyle24
    jhfstyle24 Member Posts: 3,256
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery

    Idiot. Put Salvon in that scheme and he destroys Borghi's numbers. Being a scat back in an air raid makes you look a lot better than you are.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,707 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery

    He's Sean McGrew in an offense that creates space for the RB.

    He would be third or fourth on our depth here.

    Rather easily.
    To say someone would be third or fourth string under Petersen is not bolstering your argument.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    DerekJohnson said:

    dnc said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery

    He's Sean McGrew in an offense that creates space for the RB.

    He would be third or fourth on our depth here.

    Rather easily.
    To say someone would be third or fourth string under Petersen is not bolstering your argument.
    Fine. He would be the third or fourth best back at UW.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,659
    jhfstyle24 said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Meh. Borghi would be the best back on our roster rather easily. Why he went to WSU is a mystery

    Idiot. Put Salvon in that scheme and he destroys Borghi's numbers. Being a scat back in an air raid makes you look a lot better than you are.
    Borghi is way better than Salvon. Borghi actualy fights through contact

    Salvon gets tackled by a 5 mph gust of wind
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter