BTW, I never really had any animosity toward your friend until he started becoming a slanderer and a purveyor of false information like Damone, twisting peoples' words and meanings to suit whatever narrative he's peddling. He's always been that way, but he's been that way more so of late. Always calling people racists when he himself has shown a penchant toward racism directed at whites. When someone uses terms like 'white trash,' (it doesn't offend me, I just hate the hypocrisy of people using terms like that then throwing a fit when they're called a beaner, a gook, or something else in return), then using these other terms to describe a person is fair game imo.
More incoherent ramblings and logical fallacies from a racist crackpot. Every is laughing at you.
Really? No one is upvoted or chinning any of your posts except for your racist, beaner sidekick.
BTW, I never really had any animosity toward your friend until he started becoming a slanderer and a purveyor of false information like Damone, twisting peoples' words and meanings to suit whatever narrative he's peddling. He's always been that way, but he's been that way more so of late. Always calling people racists when he himself has shown a penchant toward racism directed at whites. When someone uses terms like 'white trash,' (it doesn't offend me, I just hate the hypocrisy of people using terms like that then throwing a fit when they're called a beaner, a gook, or something else in return), then using these other terms to describe a person is fair game imo.
Look, you and I have had a lock of good banter here over the years and I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. As I said in one of the other threads, no one should be accusing someone of racism for holding any of the following views:
1 - The Euro zone has created some significant problems for themselves because of high levels of immigration from N. African and the Middle East. They aren't very good at running a melting pot in comparison the USA.
2- Allowing illegal immigration is bad policy and the border should be secure.
3- Immigration policy should be based on economic benefit to the broadest swath of the US population as possible.
4- Lastly, we do do have a refugee crisis on our hands because of failed states in Latin America, and it simply not possible to let in every single person who wants to get asylum status in the US.
But where you are going to veer into the the racism lane and run afoul of @creepycoug@MikeDamone - and pretty much every poster here - is if you argue immigration policy should be geared toward keeping the US a white ancestry, majority nation. We were never set up to be a nation state based on tribe (sorry @Swaye ), but rather adherence to a creed- i.e., We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happinesss.
Demographic change has been a constant in the country since it's founding and folks have been bitching (they were racist AF) about foreign hordes invading America ever since.
First, my English ancestors who got here on the Mayflower BTW, complained about the Germans and the Irish. Then it was the Polacks (I married one; so did Creep) , Jews and Italians. Now it's Creep's swarthy people. But through every demographic shift the melting pot has done it's thing and we are still by far the most successful and richest large nation on Earth and this isn't changing anytime soon. Yes, something like 30% of the US will have some Hispanic ancestry by 2050, but most will be muts and I'm sure their Engrish will be skrong.
I can appreciate your position. Lets keep it 100 percent honest.
America is more tribal than most want to believe. It's why leftist identity politics has been so successful. Consider the following if you will:
Lets say we take 4,000 people: 1000 blacks, 1000 whites, 1000 hispanics, 1000 asians. Now separate each person and ask them to privately, anonymously select which racial group they would prefer be the majority in their country. They can only select one, because the reality is that there can ever only be one majority in a particular country at a particular time.
Now If you think you can honestly tell me that 9/10 people won't select their own race, and prefer their own race to be in the majority, then I'll admit I'm a racist for holding that position. But I don't think you can honestly tell me that. Self interest, self preservation, tribalism, will boil up to the surface when people are allowed to express their viewpoints free from mob rule. The black person isn't going to vote for a white majority. The white person won't vote for an Asian majority. The Asian won't vote for a Hispanic majority, and so on and so on. When everyone is a 'racist,' no one is.
As for running afoul of shitstains like Mike Damone and his sidekick, I couldn't care less about offending a latino racist and a smear peddling liar. Look at Mike Damone's posting history, he routinely lies, uses the same "HondoBro" smear tactics he pretends to oppose.
And, sorry folks, but if terms like white trash and cracker are on the table, lets not be hypocrites and throw temper tantrums when the terms like beaner, gook, dego, guido, chink, jap, heeb, raghead, etc. are tossed around as well.
And, sorry folks, but if terms like white trash and cracker are on the table, lets not be hypocrites and throw temper tantrums when the terms like beaner, gook, dego, guido, chink, jap, heeb, raghead, etc. are tossed around as well.
And, sorry folks, but if terms like white trash and cracker are on the table, lets not be hypocrites and throw temper tantrums when the terms like beaner, gook, dego, guido, chink, jap, heeb, raghead, etc. are tossed around as well.
Nobody cares about the use of those terms here.
Nice try at deflecting, but that's not the issue. And you know it.
BTW, I never really had any animosity toward your friend until he started becoming a slanderer and a purveyor of false information like Damone, twisting peoples' words and meanings to suit whatever narrative he's peddling. He's always been that way, but he's been that way more so of late. Always calling people racists when he himself has shown a penchant toward racism directed at whites. When someone uses terms like 'white trash,' (it doesn't offend me, I just hate the hypocrisy of people using terms like that then throwing a fit when they're called a beaner, a gook, or something else in return), then using these other terms to describe a person is fair game imo.
Look, you and I have had a lock of good banter here over the years and I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. As I said in one of the other threads, no one should be accusing someone of racism for holding any of the following views:
1 - The Euro zone has created some significant problems for themselves because of high levels of immigration from N. African and the Middle East. They aren't very good at running a melting pot in comparison the USA.
2- Allowing illegal immigration is bad policy and the border should be secure.
3- Immigration policy should be based on economic benefit to the broadest swath of the US population as possible.
4- Lastly, we do do have a refugee crisis on our hands because of failed states in Latin America, and it simply not possible to let in every single person who wants to get asylum status in the US.
But where you are going to veer into the the racism lane and run afoul of @creepycoug@MikeDamone - and pretty much every poster here - is if you argue immigration policy should be geared toward keeping the US a white ancestry, majority nation. We were never set up to be a nation state based on tribe (sorry @Swaye ), but rather adherence to a creed- i.e., We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happinesss.
Demographic change has been a constant in the country since it's founding and folks have been bitching (they were racist AF) about foreign hordes invading America ever since.
First, my English ancestors who got here on the Mayflower BTW, complained about the Germans and the Irish. Then it was the Polacks (I married one; so did Creep) , Jews and Italians. Now it's Creep's swarthy people. But through every demographic shift the melting pot has done it's thing and we are still by far the most successful and richest large nation on Earth and this isn't changing anytime soon. Yes, something like 30% of the US will have some Hispanic ancestry by 2050, but most will be muts and I'm sure their Engrish will be skrong.
I can appreciate your position. Lets keep it 100 percent honest.
America is more tribal than most want to believe. It's why leftist identity politics has been so successful. Consider the following if you will:
Lets say we take 4,000 people: 1000 blacks, 1000 whites, 1000 hispanics, 1000 asians. Now separate each person and ask them to privately, anonymously select which racial group they would prefer be the majority in their country. They can only select one, because the reality is that there can ever only be one majority in a particular country at a particular time.
Now If you think you can honestly tell me that 9/10 people won't select their own race, and prefer their own race to be in the majority, then I'll admit I'm a racist for holding that position. But I don't think you can honestly tell me that. Self interest, self preservation, tribalism, will boil up to the surface when people are allowed to express their viewpoints free from mob rule. The black person isn't going to vote for a white majority. The white person won't vote for an Asian majority. The Asian won't vote for a Hispanic majority, and so on and so on. When everyone is a 'racist,' no one is.
As for running afoul of shitstains like Mike Damone and his sidekick, I couldn't care less about offending a latino racist and a smear peddling liar. Look at Mike Damone's posting history, he routinely lies, uses the same "HondoBro" smear tactics he pretends to oppose.
I’m not offended. I like calling out racist pieces of shit like you. You seem upset your getting accurately labeled. Your own words implicate you. You want a white majority nation because you think whites are superior and that is what it is “meant” to be, You think it’s in Latinos DNA to be socialist. I guess you think their race prevents Thomas Jefferson words from being accepted by them. Then, as it turns out, Latin America is rejecting socialism. LOL. What an ignorant racist asshole.
BTW, I never really had any animosity toward your friend until he started becoming a slanderer and a purveyor of false information like Damone, twisting peoples' words and meanings to suit whatever narrative he's peddling. He's always been that way, but he's been that way more so of late. Always calling people racists when he himself has shown a penchant toward racism directed at whites. When someone uses terms like 'white trash,' (it doesn't offend me, I just hate the hypocrisy of people using terms like that then throwing a fit when they're called a beaner, a gook, or something else in return), then using these other terms to describe a person is fair game imo.
Look, you and I have had a lock of good banter here over the years and I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. As I said in one of the other threads, no one should be accusing someone of racism for holding any of the following views:
1 - The Euro zone has created some significant problems for themselves because of high levels of immigration from N. African and the Middle East. They aren't very good at running a melting pot in comparison the USA.
2- Allowing illegal immigration is bad policy and the border should be secure.
3- Immigration policy should be based on economic benefit to the broadest swath of the US population as possible.
4- Lastly, we do do have a refugee crisis on our hands because of failed states in Latin America, and it simply not possible to let in every single person who wants to get asylum status in the US.
But where you are going to veer into the the racism lane and run afoul of @creepycoug@MikeDamone - and pretty much every poster here - is if you argue immigration policy should be geared toward keeping the US a white ancestry, majority nation. We were never set up to be a nation state based on tribe (sorry @Swaye ), but rather adherence to a creed- i.e., We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happinesss.
Demographic change has been a constant in the country since it's founding and folks have been bitching (they were racist AF) about foreign hordes invading America ever since.
First, my English ancestors who got here on the Mayflower BTW, complained about the Germans and the Irish. Then it was the Polacks (I married one; so did Creep) , Jews and Italians. Now it's Creep's swarthy people. But through every demographic shift the melting pot has done it's thing and we are still by far the most successful and richest large nation on Earth and this isn't changing anytime soon. Yes, something like 30% of the US will have some Hispanic ancestry by 2050, but most will be muts and I'm sure their Engrish will be skrong.
I can appreciate your position. Lets keep it 100 percent honest.
America is more tribal than most want to believe. It's why leftist identity politics has been so successful. Consider the following if you will:
Lets say we take 4,000 people: 1000 blacks, 1000 whites, 1000 hispanics, 1000 asians. Now separate each person and ask them to privately, anonymously select which racial group they would prefer be the majority in their country. They can only select one, because the reality is that there can ever only be one majority in a particular country at a particular time.
Now If you think you can honestly tell me that 9/10 people won't select their own race, and prefer their own race to be in the majority, then I'll admit I'm a racist for holding that position. But I don't think you can honestly tell me that. Self interest, self preservation, tribalism, will boil up to the surface when people are allowed to express their viewpoints free from mob rule. The black person isn't going to vote for a white majority. The white person won't vote for an Asian majority. The Asian won't vote for a Hispanic majority, and so on and so on. When everyone is a 'racist,' no one is.
As for running afoul of shitstains like Mike Damone and his sidekick, I couldn't care less about offending a latino racist and a smear peddling liar. Look at Mike Damone's posting history, he routinely lies, uses the same "HondoBro" smear tactics he pretends to oppose.
I’m not offended. I like calling out racist pieces of shit like you. You seem upset your getting accurately labeled. Your own words implicate you. You want a white majority nation because you think whites are superior and that is what it is “meant” to be, You think it’s in Latinos DNA to be socialist. I guess you think their race prevents Thomas Jefferson words from being accepted by them. Then, as it turns out, Latin America is rejecting socialism. LOL. What an ignorant racist asshole.
You keep regurgitating the same line, but fail to provide a quote where I ever said that.
BTW, I never really had any animosity toward your friend until he started becoming a slanderer and a purveyor of false information like Damone, twisting peoples' words and meanings to suit whatever narrative he's peddling. He's always been that way, but he's been that way more so of late. Always calling people racists when he himself has shown a penchant toward racism directed at whites. When someone uses terms like 'white trash,' (it doesn't offend me, I just hate the hypocrisy of people using terms like that then throwing a fit when they're called a beaner, a gook, or something else in return), then using these other terms to describe a person is fair game imo.
Look, you and I have had a lock of good banter here over the years and I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. As I said in one of the other threads, no one should be accusing someone of racism for holding any of the following views:
1 - The Euro zone has created some significant problems for themselves because of high levels of immigration from N. African and the Middle East. They aren't very good at running a melting pot in comparison the USA.
2- Allowing illegal immigration is bad policy and the border should be secure.
3- Immigration policy should be based on economic benefit to the broadest swath of the US population as possible.
4- Lastly, we do do have a refugee crisis on our hands because of failed states in Latin America, and it simply not possible to let in every single person who wants to get asylum status in the US.
But where you are going to veer into the the racism lane and run afoul of @creepycoug@MikeDamone - and pretty much every poster here - is if you argue immigration policy should be geared toward keeping the US a white ancestry, majority nation. We were never set up to be a nation state based on tribe (sorry @Swaye ), but rather adherence to a creed- i.e., We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happinesss.
Demographic change has been a constant in the country since it's founding and folks have been bitching (they were racist AF) about foreign hordes invading America ever since.
First, my English ancestors who got here on the Mayflower BTW, complained about the Germans and the Irish. Then it was the Polacks (I married one; so did Creep) , Jews and Italians. Now it's Creep's swarthy people. But through every demographic shift the melting pot has done it's thing and we are still by far the most successful and richest large nation on Earth and this isn't changing anytime soon. Yes, something like 30% of the US will have some Hispanic ancestry by 2050, but most will be muts and I'm sure their Engrish will be skrong.
I can appreciate your position. Lets keep it 100 percent honest.
America is more tribal than most want to believe. It's why leftist identity politics has been so successful. Consider the following if you will:
Lets say we take 4,000 people: 1000 blacks, 1000 whites, 1000 hispanics, 1000 asians. Now separate each person and ask them to privately, anonymously select which racial group they would prefer be the majority in their country. They can only select one, because the reality is that there can ever only be one majority in a particular country at a particular time.
Now If you think you can honestly tell me that 9/10 people won't select their own race, and prefer their own race to be in the majority, then I'll admit I'm a racist for holding that position. But I don't think you can honestly tell me that. Self interest, self preservation, tribalism, will boil up to the surface when people are allowed to express their viewpoints free from mob rule. The black person isn't going to vote for a white majority. The white person won't vote for an Asian majority. The Asian won't vote for a Hispanic majority, and so on and so on. When everyone is a 'racist,' no one is.
As for running afoul of shitstains like Mike Damone and his sidekick, I couldn't care less about offending a latino racist and a smear peddling liar. Look at Mike Damone's posting history, he routinely lies, uses the same "HondoBro" smear tactics he pretends to oppose.
I’m not offended. I like calling out racist pieces of shit like you. You seem upset your getting accurately labeled. Your own words implicate you. You want a white majority nation because you think whites are superior and that is what it is “meant” to be, You think it’s in Latinos DNA to be socialist. I guess you think their race prevents Thomas Jefferson words from being accepted by them. Then, as it turns out, Latin America is rejecting socialism. LOL. What an ignorant racist asshole.
You keep regurgitating the same line, but fail to provide a quote where I ever said that.
HondoBro going to HondoBro.
As your credibility continues to tank.
Of course you believe that. Why would you want a majority white nation? Because you think others are inferior. Why was it “meant to be a majority white nation”. Because you believe yo are superior.
Clear it up right now. Tell us in your words if you think your race is superior to others. You won’t, because you believe you are. You’re too much of a pussy to answer the question. Racist.
BTW, I never really had any animosity toward your friend until he started becoming a slanderer and a purveyor of false information like Damone, twisting peoples' words and meanings to suit whatever narrative he's peddling. He's always been that way, but he's been that way more so of late. Always calling people racists when he himself has shown a penchant toward racism directed at whites. When someone uses terms like 'white trash,' (it doesn't offend me, I just hate the hypocrisy of people using terms like that then throwing a fit when they're called a beaner, a gook, or something else in return), then using these other terms to describe a person is fair game imo.
Look, you and I have had a lock of good banter here over the years and I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. As I said in one of the other threads, no one should be accusing someone of racism for holding any of the following views:
1 - The Euro zone has created some significant problems for themselves because of high levels of immigration from N. African and the Middle East. They aren't very good at running a melting pot in comparison the USA.
2- Allowing illegal immigration is bad policy and the border should be secure.
3- Immigration policy should be based on economic benefit to the broadest swath of the US population as possible.
4- Lastly, we do do have a refugee crisis on our hands because of failed states in Latin America, and it simply not possible to let in every single person who wants to get asylum status in the US.
But where you are going to veer into the the racism lane and run afoul of @creepycoug@MikeDamone - and pretty much every poster here - is if you argue immigration policy should be geared toward keeping the US a white ancestry, majority nation. We were never set up to be a nation state based on tribe (sorry @Swaye ), but rather adherence to a creed- i.e., We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happinesss.
Demographic change has been a constant in the country since it's founding and folks have been bitching (they were racist AF) about foreign hordes invading America ever since.
First, my English ancestors who got here on the Mayflower BTW, complained about the Germans and the Irish. Then it was the Polacks (I married one; so did Creep) , Jews and Italians. Now it's Creep's swarthy people. But through every demographic shift the melting pot has done it's thing and we are still by far the most successful and richest large nation on Earth and this isn't changing anytime soon. Yes, something like 30% of the US will have some Hispanic ancestry by 2050, but most will be muts and I'm sure their Engrish will be skrong.
I can appreciate your position. Lets keep it 100 percent honest.
America is more tribal than most want to believe. It's why leftist identity politics has been so successful. Consider the following if you will:
Lets say we take 4,000 people: 1000 blacks, 1000 whites, 1000 hispanics, 1000 asians. Now separate each person and ask them to privately, anonymously select which racial group they would prefer be the majority in their country. They can only select one, because the reality is that there can ever only be one majority in a particular country at a particular time.
Now If you think you can honestly tell me that 9/10 people won't select their own race, and prefer their own race to be in the majority, then I'll admit I'm a racist for holding that position. But I don't think you can honestly tell me that. Self interest, self preservation, tribalism, will boil up to the surface when people are allowed to express their viewpoints free from mob rule. The black person isn't going to vote for a white majority. The white person won't vote for an Asian majority. The Asian won't vote for a Hispanic majority, and so on and so on. When everyone is a 'racist,' no one is.
As for running afoul of shitstains like Mike Damone and his sidekick, I couldn't care less about offending a latino racist and a smear peddling liar. Look at Mike Damone's posting history, he routinely lies, uses the same "HondoBro" smear tactics he pretends to oppose.
I’m not offended. I like calling out racist pieces of shit like you. You seem upset your getting accurately labeled. Your own words implicate you. You want a white majority nation because you think whites are superior and that is what it is “meant” to be, You think it’s in Latinos DNA to be socialist. I guess you think their race prevents Thomas Jefferson words from being accepted by them. Then, as it turns out, Latin America is rejecting socialism. LOL. What an ignorant racist asshole.
You keep regurgitating the same line, but fail to provide a quote where I ever said that.
HondoBro going to HondoBro.
As your credibility continues to tank.
Of course you believe that. Why would you want a majority white nation? Because you think others are inferior. Why was it “meant to be a majority white nation”. Because you believe yo are superior.
Clear it up right now. Tell us in your words if you think your race is superior to others. You won’t, because you believe you are. You’re too much of a pussy to answer the question. Racist.
You've stated several times that I said white people are superior. I never have. Provide the quote where I said that or just admit what you are: a smear peddling liar. Mob mentality. Hondo Bro.
BTW, I never really had any animosity toward your friend until he started becoming a slanderer and a purveyor of false information like Damone, twisting peoples' words and meanings to suit whatever narrative he's peddling. He's always been that way, but he's been that way more so of late. Always calling people racists when he himself has shown a penchant toward racism directed at whites. When someone uses terms like 'white trash,' (it doesn't offend me, I just hate the hypocrisy of people using terms like that then throwing a fit when they're called a beaner, a gook, or something else in return), then using these other terms to describe a person is fair game imo.
Look, you and I have had a lock of good banter here over the years and I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. As I said in one of the other threads, no one should be accusing someone of racism for holding any of the following views:
1 - The Euro zone has created some significant problems for themselves because of high levels of immigration from N. African and the Middle East. They aren't very good at running a melting pot in comparison the USA.
2- Allowing illegal immigration is bad policy and the border should be secure.
3- Immigration policy should be based on economic benefit to the broadest swath of the US population as possible.
4- Lastly, we do do have a refugee crisis on our hands because of failed states in Latin America, and it simply not possible to let in every single person who wants to get asylum status in the US.
But where you are going to veer into the the racism lane and run afoul of @creepycoug@MikeDamone - and pretty much every poster here - is if you argue immigration policy should be geared toward keeping the US a white ancestry, majority nation. We were never set up to be a nation state based on tribe (sorry @Swaye ), but rather adherence to a creed- i.e., We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happinesss.
Demographic change has been a constant in the country since it's founding and folks have been bitching (they were racist AF) about foreign hordes invading America ever since.
First, my English ancestors who got here on the Mayflower BTW, complained about the Germans and the Irish. Then it was the Polacks (I married one; so did Creep) , Jews and Italians. Now it's Creep's swarthy people. But through every demographic shift the melting pot has done it's thing and we are still by far the most successful and richest large nation on Earth and this isn't changing anytime soon. Yes, something like 30% of the US will have some Hispanic ancestry by 2050, but most will be muts and I'm sure their Engrish will be skrong.
I can appreciate your position. Lets keep it 100 percent honest.
America is more tribal than most want to believe. It's why leftist identity politics has been so successful. Consider the following if you will:
Lets say we take 4,000 people: 1000 blacks, 1000 whites, 1000 hispanics, 1000 asians. Now separate each person and ask them to privately, anonymously select which racial group they would prefer be the majority in their country. They can only select one, because the reality is that there can ever only be one majority in a particular country at a particular time.
Now If you think you can honestly tell me that 9/10 people won't select their own race, and prefer their own race to be in the majority, then I'll admit I'm a racist for holding that position. But I don't think you can honestly tell me that. Self interest, self preservation, tribalism, will boil up to the surface when people are allowed to express their viewpoints free from mob rule. The black person isn't going to vote for a white majority. The white person won't vote for an Asian majority. The Asian won't vote for a Hispanic majority, and so on and so on. When everyone is a 'racist,' no one is.
As for running afoul of shitstains like Mike Damone and his sidekick, I couldn't care less about offending a latino racist and a smear peddling liar. Look at Mike Damone's posting history, he routinely lies, uses the same "HondoBro" smear tactics he pretends to oppose.
I’m not offended. I like calling out racist pieces of shit like you. You seem upset your getting accurately labeled. Your own words implicate you. You want a white majority nation because you think whites are superior and that is what it is “meant” to be, You think it’s in Latinos DNA to be socialist. I guess you think their race prevents Thomas Jefferson words from being accepted by them. Then, as it turns out, Latin America is rejecting socialism. LOL. What an ignorant racist asshole.
You keep regurgitating the same line, but fail to provide a quote where I ever said that.
HondoBro going to HondoBro.
As your credibility continues to tank.
Of course you believe that. Why would you want a majority white nation? Because you think others are inferior. Why was it “meant to be a majority white nation”. Because you believe yo are superior.
Clear it up right now. Tell us in your words if you think your race is superior to others. You won’t, because you believe you are. You’re too much of a pussy to answer the question. Racist.
You've stated several times that I said white people are superior. I never have. Provide the quote where I said that or just admit what you are: a smear peddling liar. Mob mentality. Hondo Bro.
BTW, I never really had any animosity toward your friend until he started becoming a slanderer and a purveyor of false information like Damone, twisting peoples' words and meanings to suit whatever narrative he's peddling. He's always been that way, but he's been that way more so of late. Always calling people racists when he himself has shown a penchant toward racism directed at whites. When someone uses terms like 'white trash,' (it doesn't offend me, I just hate the hypocrisy of people using terms like that then throwing a fit when they're called a beaner, a gook, or something else in return), then using these other terms to describe a person is fair game imo.
Look, you and I have had a lock of good banter here over the years and I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. As I said in one of the other threads, no one should be accusing someone of racism for holding any of the following views:
1 - The Euro zone has created some significant problems for themselves because of high levels of immigration from N. African and the Middle East. They aren't very good at running a melting pot in comparison the USA.
2- Allowing illegal immigration is bad policy and the border should be secure.
3- Immigration policy should be based on economic benefit to the broadest swath of the US population as possible.
4- Lastly, we do do have a refugee crisis on our hands because of failed states in Latin America, and it simply not possible to let in every single person who wants to get asylum status in the US.
But where you are going to veer into the the racism lane and run afoul of @creepycoug@MikeDamone - and pretty much every poster here - is if you argue immigration policy should be geared toward keeping the US a white ancestry, majority nation. We were never set up to be a nation state based on tribe (sorry @Swaye ), but rather adherence to a creed- i.e., We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happinesss.
Demographic change has been a constant in the country since it's founding and folks have been bitching (they were racist AF) about foreign hordes invading America ever since.
First, my English ancestors who got here on the Mayflower BTW, complained about the Germans and the Irish. Then it was the Polacks (I married one; so did Creep) , Jews and Italians. Now it's Creep's swarthy people. But through every demographic shift the melting pot has done it's thing and we are still by far the most successful and richest large nation on Earth and this isn't changing anytime soon. Yes, something like 30% of the US will have some Hispanic ancestry by 2050, but most will be muts and I'm sure their Engrish will be skrong.
I can appreciate your position. Lets keep it 100 percent honest.
America is more tribal than most want to believe. It's why leftist identity politics has been so successful. Consider the following if you will:
Lets say we take 4,000 people: 1000 blacks, 1000 whites, 1000 hispanics, 1000 asians. Now separate each person and ask them to privately, anonymously select which racial group they would prefer be the majority in their country. They can only select one, because the reality is that there can ever only be one majority in a particular country at a particular time.
Now If you think you can honestly tell me that 9/10 people won't select their own race, and prefer their own race to be in the majority, then I'll admit I'm a racist for holding that position. But I don't think you can honestly tell me that. Self interest, self preservation, tribalism, will boil up to the surface when people are allowed to express their viewpoints free from mob rule. The black person isn't going to vote for a white majority. The white person won't vote for an Asian majority. The Asian won't vote for a Hispanic majority, and so on and so on. When everyone is a 'racist,' no one is.
As for running afoul of shitstains like Mike Damone and his sidekick, I couldn't care less about offending a latino racist and a smear peddling liar. Look at Mike Damone's posting history, he routinely lies, uses the same "HondoBro" smear tactics he pretends to oppose.
I’m not offended. I like calling out racist pieces of shit like you. You seem upset your getting accurately labeled. Your own words implicate you. You want a white majority nation because you think whites are superior and that is what it is “meant” to be, You think it’s in Latinos DNA to be socialist. I guess you think their race prevents Thomas Jefferson words from being accepted by them. Then, as it turns out, Latin America is rejecting socialism. LOL. What an ignorant racist asshole.
You keep regurgitating the same line, but fail to provide a quote where I ever said that.
HondoBro going to HondoBro.
As your credibility continues to tank.
Of course you believe that. Why would you want a majority white nation? Because you think others are inferior. Why was it “meant to be a majority white nation”. Because you believe yo are superior.
Clear it up right now. Tell us in your words if you think your race is superior to others. You won’t, because you believe you are. You’re too much of a pussy to answer the question. Racist.
You've stated several times that I said white people are superior. I never have. Provide the quote where I said that or just admit what you are: a smear peddling liar. Mob mentality. Hondo Bro.
I said you think other races are inferior to whites. I stand by that statement.
Do you think white people are superior. Clear it up for us. Or we can just take your words where you want a white majority as indented at face value. Racist.
BTW, I never really had any animosity toward your friend until he started becoming a slanderer and a purveyor of false information like Damone, twisting peoples' words and meanings to suit whatever narrative he's peddling. He's always been that way, but he's been that way more so of late. Always calling people racists when he himself has shown a penchant toward racism directed at whites. When someone uses terms like 'white trash,' (it doesn't offend me, I just hate the hypocrisy of people using terms like that then throwing a fit when they're called a beaner, a gook, or something else in return), then using these other terms to describe a person is fair game imo.
Look, you and I have had a lock of good banter here over the years and I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. As I said in one of the other threads, no one should be accusing someone of racism for holding any of the following views:
1 - The Euro zone has created some significant problems for themselves because of high levels of immigration from N. African and the Middle East. They aren't very good at running a melting pot in comparison the USA.
2- Allowing illegal immigration is bad policy and the border should be secure.
3- Immigration policy should be based on economic benefit to the broadest swath of the US population as possible.
4- Lastly, we do do have a refugee crisis on our hands because of failed states in Latin America, and it simply not possible to let in every single person who wants to get asylum status in the US.
But where you are going to veer into the the racism lane and run afoul of @creepycoug@MikeDamone - and pretty much every poster here - is if you argue immigration policy should be geared toward keeping the US a white ancestry, majority nation. We were never set up to be a nation state based on tribe (sorry @Swaye ), but rather adherence to a creed- i.e., We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happinesss.
Demographic change has been a constant in the country since it's founding and folks have been bitching (they were racist AF) about foreign hordes invading America ever since.
First, my English ancestors who got here on the Mayflower BTW, complained about the Germans and the Irish. Then it was the Polacks (I married one; so did Creep) , Jews and Italians. Now it's Creep's swarthy people. But through every demographic shift the melting pot has done it's thing and we are still by far the most successful and richest large nation on Earth and this isn't changing anytime soon. Yes, something like 30% of the US will have some Hispanic ancestry by 2050, but most will be muts and I'm sure their Engrish will be skrong.
I can appreciate your position. Lets keep it 100 percent honest.
America is more tribal than most want to believe. It's why leftist identity politics has been so successful. Consider the following if you will:
Lets say we take 4,000 people: 1000 blacks, 1000 whites, 1000 hispanics, 1000 asians. Now separate each person and ask them to privately, anonymously select which racial group they would prefer be the majority in their country. They can only select one, because the reality is that there can ever only be one majority in a particular country at a particular time.
Now If you think you can honestly tell me that 9/10 people won't select their own race, and prefer their own race to be in the majority, then I'll admit I'm a racist for holding that position. But I don't think you can honestly tell me that. Self interest, self preservation, tribalism, will boil up to the surface when people are allowed to express their viewpoints free from mob rule. The black person isn't going to vote for a white majority. The white person won't vote for an Asian majority. The Asian won't vote for a Hispanic majority, and so on and so on. When everyone is a 'racist,' no one is.
As for running afoul of shitstains like Mike Damone and his sidekick, I couldn't care less about offending a latino racist and a smear peddling liar. Look at Mike Damone's posting history, he routinely lies, uses the same "HondoBro" smear tactics he pretends to oppose.
I’m not offended. I like calling out racist pieces of shit like you. You seem upset your getting accurately labeled. Your own words implicate you. You want a white majority nation because you think whites are superior and that is what it is “meant” to be, You think it’s in Latinos DNA to be socialist. I guess you think their race prevents Thomas Jefferson words from being accepted by them. Then, as it turns out, Latin America is rejecting socialism. LOL. What an ignorant racist asshole.
You keep regurgitating the same line, but fail to provide a quote where I ever said that.
HondoBro going to HondoBro.
As your credibility continues to tank.
Of course you believe that. Why would you want a majority white nation? Because you think others are inferior. Why was it “meant to be a majority white nation”. Because you believe yo are superior.
Clear it up right now. Tell us in your words if you think your race is superior to others. You won’t, because you believe you are. You’re too much of a pussy to answer the question. Racist.
You've stated several times that I said white people are superior. I never have. Provide the quote where I said that or just admit what you are: a smear peddling liar. Mob mentality. Hondo Bro.
I said you think other races are inferior to whites. I stand by that statement.
Do you think white people are superior. Clear it up for us. Or we can just take your words where you want a white majority as indented at face value. Racist.
You aren't owed an answer to that question or any other. I don't have any respect for smear peddling Hondo Bros like yourself. A pile of horse shit has more credibility than you. I explained my position multiple times already, including in this thread. If you misread, misinterpreted or just can't understand it, that's your own problem. I think you understand it perfectly fine though, you're just a lying piece of shit who likes to go on smear campaigns in general because you get off on it. That's pretty obvious from your posting history. Reference your campaign against PLSS.
The only reason you keep demanding an answer to this question you keep repeating is because I backed you into a corner and you can't get out. You can't provide a quote of me ever saying such a thing, so you can't do that. And you won't admit you're a shit eating liar either, who twists my words and viewpoints into something they are not. Those are your only two options, and one of them is impossible, so that leaves only one.
Admit you're a smear peddling liar and I'll answer your question.
BTW, I never really had any animosity toward your friend until he started becoming a slanderer and a purveyor of false information like Damone, twisting peoples' words and meanings to suit whatever narrative he's peddling. He's always been that way, but he's been that way more so of late. Always calling people racists when he himself has shown a penchant toward racism directed at whites. When someone uses terms like 'white trash,' (it doesn't offend me, I just hate the hypocrisy of people using terms like that then throwing a fit when they're called a beaner, a gook, or something else in return), then using these other terms to describe a person is fair game imo.
Look, you and I have had a lock of good banter here over the years and I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. As I said in one of the other threads, no one should be accusing someone of racism for holding any of the following views:
1 - The Euro zone has created some significant problems for themselves because of high levels of immigration from N. African and the Middle East. They aren't very good at running a melting pot in comparison the USA.
2- Allowing illegal immigration is bad policy and the border should be secure.
3- Immigration policy should be based on economic benefit to the broadest swath of the US population as possible.
4- Lastly, we do do have a refugee crisis on our hands because of failed states in Latin America, and it simply not possible to let in every single person who wants to get asylum status in the US.
But where you are going to veer into the the racism lane and run afoul of @creepycoug@MikeDamone - and pretty much every poster here - is if you argue immigration policy should be geared toward keeping the US a white ancestry, majority nation. We were never set up to be a nation state based on tribe (sorry @Swaye ), but rather adherence to a creed- i.e., We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happinesss.
Demographic change has been a constant in the country since it's founding and folks have been bitching (they were racist AF) about foreign hordes invading America ever since.
First, my English ancestors who got here on the Mayflower BTW, complained about the Germans and the Irish. Then it was the Polacks (I married one; so did Creep) , Jews and Italians. Now it's Creep's swarthy people. But through every demographic shift the melting pot has done it's thing and we are still by far the most successful and richest large nation on Earth and this isn't changing anytime soon. Yes, something like 30% of the US will have some Hispanic ancestry by 2050, but most will be muts and I'm sure their Engrish will be skrong.
I can appreciate your position. Lets keep it 100 percent honest.
America is more tribal than most want to believe. It's why leftist identity politics has been so successful. Consider the following if you will:
Lets say we take 4,000 people: 1000 blacks, 1000 whites, 1000 hispanics, 1000 asians. Now separate each person and ask them to privately, anonymously select which racial group they would prefer be the majority in their country. They can only select one, because the reality is that there can ever only be one majority in a particular country at a particular time.
Now If you think you can honestly tell me that 9/10 people won't select their own race, and prefer their own race to be in the majority, then I'll admit I'm a racist for holding that position. But I don't think you can honestly tell me that. Self interest, self preservation, tribalism, will boil up to the surface when people are allowed to express their viewpoints free from mob rule. The black person isn't going to vote for a white majority. The white person won't vote for an Asian majority. The Asian won't vote for a Hispanic majority, and so on and so on. When everyone is a 'racist,' no one is.
As for running afoul of shitstains like Mike Damone and his sidekick, I couldn't care less about offending a latino racist and a smear peddling liar. Look at Mike Damone's posting history, he routinely lies, uses the same "HondoBro" smear tactics he pretends to oppose.
I’m not offended. I like calling out racist pieces of shit like you. You seem upset your getting accurately labeled. Your own words implicate you. You want a white majority nation because you think whites are superior and that is what it is “meant” to be, You think it’s in Latinos DNA to be socialist. I guess you think their race prevents Thomas Jefferson words from being accepted by them. Then, as it turns out, Latin America is rejecting socialism. LOL. What an ignorant racist asshole.
You keep regurgitating the same line, but fail to provide a quote where I ever said that.
HondoBro going to HondoBro.
As your credibility continues to tank.
Of course you believe that. Why would you want a majority white nation? Because you think others are inferior. Why was it “meant to be a majority white nation”. Because you believe yo are superior.
Clear it up right now. Tell us in your words if you think your race is superior to others. You won’t, because you believe you are. You’re too much of a pussy to answer the question. Racist.
You've stated several times that I said white people are superior. I never have. Provide the quote where I said that or just admit what you are: a smear peddling liar. Mob mentality. Hondo Bro.
I said you think other races are inferior to whites. I stand by that statement.
Do you think white people are superior. Clear it up for us. Or we can just take your words where you want a white majority as indented at face value. Racist.
You aren't owed an answer to that question or any other. I don't have any respect for smear peddling Hondo Bros like yourself. A pile of horse shit has more credibility than you. I explained my position multiple times already, including in this thread. If you misread, misinterpreted or just can't understand it, that's your own problem. I think you understand it perfectly fine though, you're just a lying piece of shit who likes to go on smear campaigns in general because you get off on it. That's pretty obvious from your posting history. Reference your campaign against PLSS.
The only reason you keep demanding an answer to this question you keep repeating is because I backed you into a corner and you can't get out. You can't provide a quote of me ever saying such a thing, so you can't do that. And you won't admit you're a shit eating liar either, who twists my words and viewpoints into something they are not. Those are your only two options, and one of them is impossible, so that leaves only one.
Admit you're a smear peddling liar and I'll answer your question.
Stunning development. Liars gonna say other people lie. Liars gonna lie I guess.
I, for one, would rather guys like OBK go ahead and spill their thoughts in public like this than grind away in a dark basement plotting a mass shooting or building a bomb to blow up a federal building. First Amendment Win, right there. I think it's fine to attack his racism and xenophobia, but call it out for what it is and what's at the root of it, which is usually just plain old fear. I really don't care if anyone calls me a racist piece of shit, because at this point I'm like "Racism? ZZZZZZZZZ. How about a less generic insult, son?" Call me a squirrel-fucker or something that at least gets my attention, because racism allegations are so over-used and abused, I just walk by them like I do a bigger on the street. Sorry, got shit to do, whether you like it or not. Adios!
I, for one, would rather guys like OBK go ahead and spill their thoughts in public like this than grind away in a dark basement plotting a mass shooting or building a bomb to blow up a federal building. First Amendment Win, right there. I think it's fine to attack his racism and xenophobia, but call it out for what it is and what's at the root of it, which is usually just plain old fear. I really don't care if anyone calls me a racist piece of shit, because at this point I'm like "Racism? ZZZZZZZZZ. How about a less generic insult, son?" Call me a squirrel-fucker or something that at least gets my attention, because racism allegations are so over-used and abused, I just walk by them like I do a bigger on the street. Sorry, got shit to do, whether you like it or not. Adios!
States the hypocrite right after he alleges racism.
If it's racist to prefer that your own race be in the majority in your nation, then all of you are racists if you're really honest with yourselves. Are you going to try to tell me that if you're Asian, that your preferred majority is going to be Hispanic, or white, or black, if you were forced to choose? No, it wouldn't be. You'd choose your own people out of self interest. That's human nature. Is that racist? Perhaps only to a super sensitive Hondo Bro like Damone, whose brains can't separate concepts of self interest from racism. And in this climate of racism being accepted against whites, you better damn well believe I would prefer a white majority. It's all about self interest for me. Not racism. Evil people in government like Ocasio-Cortez condone and peddle the 'white privilege' narratives that have stoked a lot of hatred against whites. Racists like @ThomasFremont hold such views. College campuses are the crucible where that rot is processed and refined, before it pollutes society as a whole.
Because there are many hyper sensitive pansies in here, I've explained why I use words like beaner. If you're going to toss about phrases like 'white trash' and words like 'cracker,' then prepare to get hit back with pejoratives tailored to your own race.
Feel free to provide actual quotes that show I'm a racist, and if you can't, politely piss off.
I like creep I suppose. I just don’t want his kind to be the majority.
But how is OBK a racist?
Try selling your social justice warrior logic in countries like China, Russia, India, Japan, etc., most countries in the world, you would be laughed out like the idiot that you are. It's RACIST to oppose open borders and the displacement of your people with foreigners.
Those countries all suck compared to us economically. Maybe we have the highest GDP per capita - rather easily- of any country over, say, 10,000,000 because we’re based on better ideas as opposed to tribe.
What has GDP done for the American people? Trump is president. Trump would not be president if there were not serious economic and social problems in this country, problems the Washington establishment denies and ignores.
GDP provides jobs. Or really increase in jobs is a by product of increasing GDP.
And the Dem establishment that delivered the Hillary nomination gave us Trump. By every measure, the economy has continued on the same pace it was on.
"By every measure, the economy has continued on the same pace it was on"
What a total and obvious stinking pile of dishonest shit. Do you ever tell the truth?
BTW, I never really had any animosity toward your friend until he started becoming a slanderer and a purveyor of false information like Damone, twisting peoples' words and meanings to suit whatever narrative he's peddling. He's always been that way, but he's been that way more so of late. Always calling people racists when he himself has shown a penchant toward racism directed at whites. When someone uses terms like 'white trash,' (it doesn't offend me, I just hate the hypocrisy of people using terms like that then throwing a fit when they're called a beaner, a gook, or something else in return), then using these other terms to describe a person is fair game imo.
Look, you and I have had a lock of good banter here over the years and I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. As I said in one of the other threads, no one should be accusing someone of racism for holding any of the following views:
1 - The Euro zone has created some significant problems for themselves because of high levels of immigration from N. African and the Middle East. They aren't very good at running a melting pot in comparison the USA.
2- Allowing illegal immigration is bad policy and the border should be secure.
3- Immigration policy should be based on economic benefit to the broadest swath of the US population as possible.
4- Lastly, we do do have a refugee crisis on our hands because of failed states in Latin America, and it simply not possible to let in every single person who wants to get asylum status in the US.
But where you are going to veer into the the racism lane and run afoul of @creepycoug@MikeDamone - and pretty much every poster here - is if you argue immigration policy should be geared toward keeping the US a white ancestry, majority nation. We were never set up to be a nation state based on tribe (sorry @Swaye ), but rather adherence to a creed- i.e., We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happinesss.
Demographic change has been a constant in the country since it's founding and folks have been bitching (they were racist AF) about foreign hordes invading America ever since.
First, my English ancestors who got here on the Mayflower BTW, complained about the Germans and the Irish. Then it was the Polacks (I married one; so did Creep) , Jews and Italians. Now it's Creep's swarthy people. But through every demographic shift the melting pot has done it's thing and we are still by far the most successful and richest large nation on Earth and this isn't changing anytime soon. Yes, something like 30% of the US will have some Hispanic ancestry by 2050, but most will be muts and I'm sure their Engrish will be skrong.
I can appreciate your position. Lets keep it 100 percent honest.
America is more tribal than most want to believe. It's why leftist identity politics has been so successful. Consider the following if you will:
Lets say we take 4,000 people: 1000 blacks, 1000 whites, 1000 hispanics, 1000 asians. Now separate each person and ask them to privately, anonymously select which racial group they would prefer be the majority in their country. They can only select one, because the reality is that there can ever only be one majority in a particular country at a particular time.
Now If you think you can honestly tell me that 9/10 people won't select their own race, and prefer their own race to be in the majority, then I'll admit I'm a racist for holding that position. But I don't think you can honestly tell me that. Self interest, self preservation, tribalism, will boil up to the surface when people are allowed to express their viewpoints free from mob rule. The black person isn't going to vote for a white majority. The white person won't vote for an Asian majority. The Asian won't vote for a Hispanic majority, and so on and so on. When everyone is a 'racist,' no one is.
As for running afoul of shitstains like Mike Damone and his sidekick, I couldn't care less about offending a latino racist and a smear peddling liar. Look at Mike Damone's posting history, he routinely lies, uses the same "HondoBro" smear tactics he pretends to oppose.
I’m not offended. I like calling out racist pieces of shit like you. You seem upset your getting accurately labeled. Your own words implicate you. You want a white majority nation because you think whites are superior and that is what it is “meant” to be, You think it’s in Latinos DNA to be socialist. I guess you think their race prevents Thomas Jefferson words from being accepted by them. Then, as it turns out, Latin America is rejecting socialism. LOL. What an ignorant racist asshole.
You keep regurgitating the same line, but fail to provide a quote where I ever said that.
HondoBro going to HondoBro.
As your credibility continues to tank.
Of course you believe that. Why would you want a majority white nation? Because you think others are inferior. Why was it “meant to be a majority white nation”. Because you believe yo are superior.
Clear it up right now. Tell us in your words if you think your race is superior to others. You won’t, because you believe you are. You’re too much of a pussy to answer the question. Racist.
You've stated several times that I said white people are superior. I never have. Provide the quote where I said that or just admit what you are: a smear peddling liar. Mob mentality. Hondo Bro.
I said you think other races are inferior to whites. I stand by that statement.
Do you think white people are superior. Clear it up for us. Or we can just take your words where you want a white majority as indented at face value. Racist.
You aren't owed an answer to that question or any other. I don't have any respect for smear peddling Hondo Bros like yourself. A pile of horse shit has more credibility than you. I explained my position multiple times already, including in this thread. If you misread, misinterpreted or just can't understand it, that's your own problem. I think you understand it perfectly fine though, you're just a lying piece of shit who likes to go on smear campaigns in general because you get off on it. That's pretty obvious from your posting history. Reference your campaign against PLSS.
The only reason you keep demanding an answer to this question you keep repeating is because I backed you into a corner and you can't get out. You can't provide a quote of me ever saying such a thing, so you can't do that. And you won't admit you're a shit eating liar either, who twists my words and viewpoints into something they are not. Those are your only two options, and one of them is impossible, so that leaves only one.
Admit you're a smear peddling liar and I'll answer your question.
I’m not in a corner at all. You think whites are superior to other races and said you want a white majority nation. You also said it’s in certain people’s DNA to be communist/socialist. No word trusting needed. You’re a racist. Pretty simple.
Clear it up for us. Are whites a superior race. You won’t answer because your answer will be yes.
I, for one, would rather guys like OBK go ahead and spill their thoughts in public like this than grind away in a dark basement plotting a mass shooting or building a bomb to blow up a federal building. First Amendment Win, right there. I think it's fine to attack his racism and xenophobia, but call it out for what it is and what's at the root of it, which is usually just plain old fear. I really don't care if anyone calls me a racist piece of shit, because at this point I'm like "Racism? ZZZZZZZZZ. How about a less generic insult, son?" Call me a squirrel-fucker or something that at least gets my attention, because racism allegations are so over-used and abused, I just walk by them like I do a bigger on the street. Sorry, got shit to do, whether you like it or not. Adios!
States the hypocrite right after he alleges racism.
If it's racist to prefer that your own race be in the majority in your nation, then all of you are racists if you're really honest with yourselves. Are you going to try to tell me that if you're Asian, that your preferred majority is going to be Hispanic, or white, or black, if you were forced to choose? No, it wouldn't be. You'd choose your own people out of self interest. That's human nature. Is that racist? Perhaps only to a super sensitive Hondo Bro like Damone, whose brains can't separate concepts of self interest from racism. And in this climate of racism being accepted against whites, you better damn well believe I would prefer a white majority. It's all about self interest for me. Not racism. Evil people in government like Ocasio-Cortez condone and peddle the 'white privilege' narratives that have stoked a lot of hatred against whites. Racists like @ThomasFremont hold such views. College campuses are the crucible where that rot is processed and refined, before it pollutes society as a whole.
Because there are many hyper sensitive pansies in here, I've explained why I use words like beaner. If you're going to toss about phrases like 'white trash' and words like 'cracker,' then prepare to get hit back with pejoratives tailored to your own race.
Feel free to provide actual quotes that show I'm a racist, and if you can't, politely piss off.
Comments
America is more tribal than most want to believe. It's why leftist identity politics has been so successful. Consider the following if you will:
Lets say we take 4,000 people: 1000 blacks, 1000 whites, 1000 hispanics, 1000 asians. Now separate each person and ask them to privately, anonymously select which racial group they would prefer be the majority in their country. They can only select one, because the reality is that there can ever only be one majority in a particular country at a particular time.
Now If you think you can honestly tell me that 9/10 people won't select their own race, and prefer their own race to be in the majority, then I'll admit I'm a racist for holding that position. But I don't think you can honestly tell me that. Self interest, self preservation, tribalism, will boil up to the surface when people are allowed to express their viewpoints free from mob rule. The black person isn't going to vote for a white majority. The white person won't vote for an Asian majority. The Asian won't vote for a Hispanic majority, and so on and so on. When everyone is a 'racist,' no one is.
As for running afoul of shitstains like Mike Damone and his sidekick, I couldn't care less about offending a latino racist and a smear peddling liar. Look at Mike Damone's posting history, he routinely lies, uses the same "HondoBro" smear tactics he pretends to oppose.
You seemed have to left out one. Why?
JFC what an emotional racist cunt you are.
Nice try at deflecting, but that's not the issue. And you know it.
HondoBro going to HondoBro.
As your credibility continues to tank.
Of course you believe that. Why would you want a majority white nation? Because you think others are inferior. Why was it “meant to be a majority white nation”. Because you believe yo are superior.
Clear it up right now. Tell us in your words if you think your race is superior to others. You won’t, because you believe you are. You’re too much of a pussy to answer the question. Racist.
Do you think white people are superior. Clear it up for us. Or we can just take your words where you want a white majority as indented at face value. Racist.
The only reason you keep demanding an answer to this question you keep repeating is because I backed you into a corner and you can't get out. You can't provide a quote of me ever saying such a thing, so you can't do that. And you won't admit you're a shit eating liar either, who twists my words and viewpoints into something they are not. Those are your only two options, and one of them is impossible, so that leaves only one.
Admit you're a smear peddling liar and I'll answer your question.
Your keyboard ok man?
I really don't care if anyone calls me a racist piece of shit, because at this point I'm like "Racism? ZZZZZZZZZ. How about a less generic insult, son?" Call me a squirrel-fucker or something that at least gets my attention, because racism allegations are so over-used and abused, I just walk by them like I do a bigger on the street. Sorry, got shit to do, whether you like it or not. Adios!
If it's racist to prefer that your own race be in the majority in your nation, then all of you are racists if you're really honest with yourselves. Are you going to try to tell me that if you're Asian, that your preferred majority is going to be Hispanic, or white, or black, if you were forced to choose? No, it wouldn't be. You'd choose your own people out of self interest. That's human nature. Is that racist? Perhaps only to a super sensitive Hondo Bro like Damone, whose brains can't separate concepts of self interest from racism. And in this climate of racism being accepted against whites, you better damn well believe I would prefer a white majority. It's all about self interest for me. Not racism. Evil people in government like Ocasio-Cortez condone and peddle the 'white privilege' narratives that have stoked a lot of hatred against whites. Racists like @ThomasFremont hold such views. College campuses are the crucible where that rot is processed and refined, before it pollutes society as a whole.
Because there are many hyper sensitive pansies in here, I've explained why I use words like beaner. If you're going to toss about phrases like 'white trash' and words like 'cracker,' then prepare to get hit back with pejoratives tailored to your own race.
Feel free to provide actual quotes that show I'm a racist, and if you can't, politely piss off.
What a total and obvious stinking pile of dishonest shit. Do you ever tell the truth?
Clear it up for us. Are whites a superior race. You won’t answer because your answer will be yes.