for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.
Hondo the expert on west coast urban living who rode the "train" to downtown SF once and who used to visit San Diego 20 years ago, declares there is no diminished quality of life in West Coast cities today because Race never saw this guy shitting in the streets.
Again you can't read. I said I've been going there for 20 years and still go to San Diego. Idiot.
for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.
for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.
for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.
So who would be responsible for funding infrastructure and housing and who has made new housing stock prohibitively expensive through regulation? And now - Rent Control!!!!
for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.
And when he gets out, all he sees is people shitting on the streets and shooting up. Sounds like he needs to go to more high class areas.
Good God, Race! This is just retarded. Regulation has very little to do with what happens to housing prices when hundreds of thousands more people move to a city. I thought you were the gals who worshipped markets.
for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.
for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.
So who would be responsible for funding infrastructure and housing and who has made new housing stock prohibitively expensive through regulation? And now - Rent Control!!!!
Why the President, haven't you been paying attention Race?
for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.
for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.
Hondo the expert on west coast urban living who rode the "train" to downtown SF once and who used to visit San Diego 20 years ago, declares there is no diminished quality of life in West Coast cities today because Race never saw this guy shitting in the streets.
Again you can't read. I said I've been going there for 20 years and still go to San Diego. Idiot.
Yes, yes. Going there for 20 years and took the "train" into SF once. Obviously you're an expert on urban affairs.
for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.
State clearly what my "lie" is you worthless piece of shit. The city of San Francisco's population in 1950 was 775K it then declined for 30 years and then didn't reach that number again until 2000. It's a little over 100K from that 1950 number today.
Good God, Race! This is just retarded. Regulation has very little to do with what happens to housing prices when hundreds of thousands more people move to a city. I thought you were the gals who worshipped markets.
Good Lord indeed. Your knowledge of supply and demand in housing is pitiful. Adding massive regulation from initial land buy through completion of the stock has no effect on price.
If hundreds of thousands of people move to a city it would seem that the city leaders would do all they can to add housing stock not discourage it. Guess what they choose
for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.
State clearly what my "lie" is you worthless piece of shit. The city of San Francisco's population in 1950 was 775K it then declined for 30 years and then didn't reach that number again until 2000. It's a little over 100K from that 1950 number today.
Go fuck yourself Hondo.
Pull up the link Bob. Using the city limits of San Fran is fucktarded.
for the diminishing quality of life issues facing most all of our west coast cities?
And yes Hondo, your claim that it's all a myth designed to make liberal cities look bad and the problems aren't that great will be accepted as an answer. There is no wrong answer.
First of all is it even really a problem?
If yes, what's the reason(s) for it.
I guess quality of life is pretty ideal in the rest of the nation's cities. Toledo's calling you, blob.
Has the quality of life in west coast cites decreased in the last 10 years O'Keefed? Are the cities cleaner or are they dirtier? Can you list for us the reasons why you believe that might be the case? Are these question too fucking tough for a liberal Kunt to answer?
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
We have open borders with the rest of the country. Maybe we need a wall.
So you have no explanation or reason why the quality of life in West Coast cities has diminished. Got it.
The quality of life in most places diminishes when they experience rapid population increases with no comparable increase in infrastructure, housing or services. Thus my comment about the wall. It's hard to imagine this comes as news to you, but perhaps you don't get out much.
So people are shitting and pissing and doing drugs in the streets more today in SF due to rapid increase in population? Interesting because the population here in SF is only slightly larger than it was in the 1950s and in terms of rapid increase in the cities population growth the growth rates today pale in comparison to what they were in the 1930s 40s and 50s and that's when the city spent next to nothing on services and yet you didn't have people shitting in the streets back then.
State clearly what my "lie" is you worthless piece of shit. The city of San Francisco's population in 1950 was 775K it then declined for 30 years and then didn't reach that number again until 2000. It's a little over 100K from that 1950 number today.
Go fuck yourself Hondo.
Pull up the link Bob. Using the city limits of San Fran is fucktarded.
Yeah because when you're talking about the homeless population in San Francisco it's "fucktarded" to talk about the population of San Francisco.
So Hondo, are you under some impression that because the population in Fremont has increased that has something to do with the homeless population in San Francisco? Explain the Kunt logic on that one Hondo.
Comments
Does the increase in human shit and piss in the streets increase or decrease the quality of life in urban areas?
Homelessness isn’t caused by lack or housing or housing prices. You know who isn’t homeless? Immigrants, legal or illegal. HTH
So, yes this does come as news to me.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco–Oakland–Berkeley,_CA_Metropolitan_Statistical_Area#Demographics
Go fuck yourself Hondo.
If hundreds of thousands of people move to a city it would seem that the city leaders would do all they can to add housing stock not discourage it. Guess what they choose
So my "lie" is that you're a fucking moron.