Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Heard the Dems gay candidate for Pres...

SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,540 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
...was leading the poles (lulz) in both Iowa and NH but didn't do well in last night's debate. True?

All the pundit scorecards have the loser socialists (Cuntahontas and WeekendatBernies) doing the worst of the night though.

Welp, with the small town queer who has experience managing budgets almost as large as the local Wal Mart barely treading water, Biden barely able to link a coherant sentence together when not using hugs as a sexual weapon, and the loser socialists tanking, who is it going to be? The hot Hawaiian woman who hates her own party and is a closeted Syrian traitor, the black guy who thinks he is Spartacus and seems to have no independent thoughts other than racial issues, the black woman who blew her way to the top and seems to hate black and latino criminals, or the cool Asian who likes maff and free shit? Maybe the white woman from up north somewhere with Parkinson's?

These are some compelling candidates you have here guys. Good luck with them and the impeachment. Hear it's going great!



· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134

Comments

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,833 Standard Supporter
    Swaye said:

    I went on record 6 months ago and said the Dems would have to try to actively lose to not beat Trump, and here we are, almost at halftime, and they are doing everything they can to make that dream a reality. There is nobody helping to MAGA more than Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schifforbrains, and the DNC!

    Thanks Democrats, for all you do for America. Accidentally.

    Part of me says they are doing it on purpose. The more divisive unrest they can stir up, the better for their brand.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    I'm rolling with @RoadDawg55 and the #YangGang
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,150 Founders Club
    The primary process is an abomination. Something un-holy. Since the current format came into being after 1968, we've only had one great President, a few so, so ones, and the rest twash as fuck. Give me backrooms full of cigar smoke any day of the week and leave the mouth breathing plebes out of it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,693 Founders Club
    YellowSnow said:

    The primary process is an abomination. Something un-holy. Since the current format came into being after 1968, we've only had one great President, a few so, so ones, and the rest twash as fuck. Give me backrooms full of cigar smoke any day of the week and leave the mouth breathing plebes out of it.

    Reagan, Clinton, Obama, and Trump would likely not have been president without open primaries

    There is something to hate or like for both sides here

    When @dnc rigged the 2016 primary we got Trump because they got Hillary
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,150 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:


    YellowSnow said:

    The primary process is an abomination. Something un-holy. Since the current format came into being after 1968, we've only had one great President, a few so, so ones, and the rest twash as fuck. Give me backrooms full of cigar smoke any day of the week and leave the mouth breathing plebes out of it.

    Reagan, Clinton, Obama, and Trump would likely not have been president without open primaries

    There is something to hate or like for both sides here

    When @dnc rigged the 2016 primary we got Trump because they got Hillary
    That's what I said- i.e., great, ok, bad, bad.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,693 Founders Club
    So far Trump results are not bad

    And that's what matters

    Reagan was hated just as much but delivered as well

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,150 Founders Club
    edited November 2019
    RaceBannon said:

    So far Trump results are not bad

    And that's what matters

    Reagan was hated just as much but delivered as well

    Only whacko lefties hated Reagan. He never dipped below 50% approval and left office at 73%. I get that it's a different country now, but Trump will never touch these numbers.

    The outcomes under Trump haven't been horrible thus far- i.e., no bumbling into war and good economy (albeit juiced by $1 trillion stimulus).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,460 Standard Supporter
    Scary one side is now entirely socialist/ communist scum. Talk about Russia meddling in the election....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,150 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    So far Trump results are not bad

    And that's what matters

    Reagan was hated just as much but delivered as well

    Only whacko lefties hated Reagan. He never dipped below 50% approval and left office at 73%. I get that it's a different country now, but Trump will never touch these numbers.

    The outcomes under Trump haven't been horrible thus far- i.e., no bumbling into war and good economy (albeit juiced by $1 trillion stimulus).
    I was there. The hate was mainstream. SNL to the nightly news

    The hate was real.

    It's OK Boomer, I forgive you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,833 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    So far Trump results are not bad

    And that's what matters

    Reagan was hated just as much but delivered as well

    Only whacko lefties hated Reagan. He never dipped below 50% approval and left office at 73%. I get that it's a different country now, but Trump will never touch these numbers.

    The outcomes under Trump haven't been horrible thus far- i.e., no bumbling into war and good economy (albeit juiced by $1 trillion stimulus).
    Different time. Different technology. Back then people were educated in the concept of a representative republic and didn't waste brain cells on the minutia of the day. As long that the 10 solids guaranteed by the Constitution were upheld, nobody felt the burn (SWIDT) to hold an opinion de jour or protest every fucking thing.




    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,150 Founders Club
    PurpleThrobber said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    So far Trump results are not bad

    And that's what matters

    Reagan was hated just as much but delivered as well

    Only whacko lefties hated Reagan. He never dipped below 50% approval and left office at 73%. I get that it's a different country now, but Trump will never touch these numbers.

    The outcomes under Trump haven't been horrible thus far- i.e., no bumbling into war and good economy (albeit juiced by $1 trillion stimulus).
    Different time. Different technology. Back then people were educated in the concept of a representative republic and didn't waste brain cells on the minutia of the day. As long that the 10 solids guaranteed by the Constitution were upheld, nobody felt the burn (SWIDT) to hold an opinion de jour or protest every fucking thing.




    So healthcare, housing, etc aren't covered by the Bill of Rights?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    So far Trump results are not bad

    And that's what matters

    Reagan was hated just as much but delivered as well

    Only whacko lefties hated Reagan. He never dipped below 50% approval and left office at 73%. I get that it's a different country now, but Trump will never touch these numbers.

    The outcomes under Trump haven't been horrible thus far- i.e., no bumbling into war and good economy (albeit juiced by $1 trillion stimulus).
    When you continually call the other side childish names, you'll never get their support.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,670
    Swaye said:

    ...was leading the poles (lulz) in both Iowa and NH but didn't do well in last night's debate. True?

    All the pundit scorecards have the loser socialists (Cuntahontas and WeekendatBernies) doing the worst of the night though.

    Welp, with the small town queer who has experience managing budgets almost as large as the local Wal Mart barely treading water, Biden barely able to link a coherant sentence together when not using hugs as a sexual weapon, and the loser socialists tanking, who is it going to be? The hot Hawaiian woman who hates her own party and is a closeted Syrian traitor, the black guy who thinks he is Spartacus and seems to have no independent thoughts other than racial issues, the black woman who blew her way to the top and seems to hate black and latino criminals, or the cool Asian who likes maff and free shit? Maybe the white woman from up north somewhere with Parkinson's?

    These are some compelling candidates you have here guys. Good luck with them and the impeachment. Hear it's going great!



    Super hurtful ... to bofe of us!

    What are you doing??!!!!????
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,670
    Swaye said:

    I went on record 6 months ago and said the Dems would have to try to actively lose to not beat Trump, and here we are, almost at halftime, and they are doing everything they can to make that dream a reality. There is nobody helping to MAGA more than Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schifforbrains, and the DNC!

    Thanks Democrats, for all you do for America. Accidentally.

    Thing is, Pelosi is a very smart politician. Which is why her initial instincts to hold off on this should have been followed. Alas, a combination of a really stupid political party and Trump leaving enough bread crumbs left her with little choice (I guess) than to go all in.

    Little doubt in my mind that this will effectively re-elect Trump a year ahead of tim.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,670
    PurpleThrobber said:

    Swaye said:

    I went on record 6 months ago and said the Dems would have to try to actively lose to not beat Trump, and here we are, almost at halftime, and they are doing everything they can to make that dream a reality. There is nobody helping to MAGA more than Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schifforbrains, and the DNC!

    Thanks Democrats, for all you do for America. Accidentally.

    Part of me says they are doing it on purpose. The more divisive unrest they can stir up, the better for their brand.

    That's the bet.

    If they have made only one smart calculation it's that no Democratic candidate is going to pull from Trump's base. Their target is (or should be) the middle.

    Whether anyone likes hearing it or not, Trump has engendered loyalty in his base that is difficult for any other current politician to match. There's not much he could do to alienate that group ... certainly not this shit show.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.