A choreographed dance while up by 18 and then blowing the lead us neither urban, black, or cool. Its fucking stupid and embarrassing.
HTH
The Canes did their own thing as individuals or groups.
Even the Don James teams and country boy one star legend Stan Empterman expressed themselves after big plays.
If you're just here to defend the lawnmower you won't last long
I am surprised at, and frankly disappointed in, you.
I will say it again. WINNING SOLVES ALL PROBLEMS. solves everything. Problems ranging from graduation rates to cheating on tests to free shoes to mouthy coaches to speeding tickets to smoking the plant of your choice to ambiguous sexual encounters to dancing and talking shit ... all non-issues for a winning program. Washington had many of these, and other, issues when I was in school and nobody spent any real time talking about it.
Nobody cares about the lawnmower if we win. If all that shit happens on winning teams, and it does, then it's not an issue.
That is all. We didn't blow an 18 pt. lead because of the lawnmower. We just blew and 18 pt. lead, which makes the lawnmower look stuupid. The only issue is the team that blew the lead. But some people think that any kid who would do the lawnmower with an 18 pt. lead and time to go must be lacking in discipline and this must be symptomatic of this and that because Don James blah blah blah blah blah. Non-sense.
And you're partially wrong on another poont 2: choreographed dances are, in fact, urban and black, and whether they are cool or not depends on the final score. again, winning.
I read into your response support for the idea that a lack of [honkey] decorum on the sideline is somehow symptomatic of a fundamentally flawed team.
I also read your response to say that fucking around on the sideline is not urban or black, while I maintain that the origin of that practice is most clearly and precisely that.
I think it's easier to say where we do agree: when you wind up losing, all that shit makes you look bad.
I don't even care at this point. I don't agree with you but I am not going to bother attempting to one up your post due to its appreciable girth. We can each just smugly think we're right and move on.
I read into your response support for the idea that a lack of [honkey] decorum on the sideline is somehow symptomatic of a fundamentally flawed team.
I also read your response to say that fucking around on the sideline is not urban or black, while I maintain that the origin of that practice is most clearly and precisely that.
I think it's easier to say where we do agree: when you wind up losing, all that shit makes you look bad.
You should have just read, instead of reading into. I was talking specifics, you were talking generalities. I agree with your generalities, you agree with my specifics
I don't even care at this point. I don't agree with you but I am not going to bother attempting to one up your post due to its appreciable girth. We can each just smugly think we're right and move on.
be careful. that smug disposition of the matter can be rightly applied to 101% of what's written on these message boards.
I read into your response support for the idea that a lack of [honkey] decorum on the sideline is somehow symptomatic of a fundamentally flawed team.
I also read your response to say that fucking around on the sideline is not urban or black, while I maintain that the origin of that practice is most clearly and precisely that.
I think it's easier to say where we do agree: when you wind up losing, all that shit makes you look bad.
You should have just read, instead of reading into.
I read into your response support for the idea that a lack of [honkey] decorum on the sideline is somehow symptomatic of a fundamentally flawed team.
I also read your response to say that fucking around on the sideline is not urban or black, while I maintain that the origin of that practice is most clearly and precisely that.
I think it's easier to say where we do agree: when you wind up losing, all that shit makes you look bad.
You should have just read, instead of reading into.
Your Hurricanes were a bunch of douchebag convicts that everyone fucking hated, but fellow db's. Why the hell would anyone want their team acting like those ass clowns?
Comments
I will say it again. WINNING SOLVES ALL PROBLEMS. solves everything. Problems ranging from graduation rates to cheating on tests to free shoes to mouthy coaches to speeding tickets to smoking the plant of your choice to ambiguous sexual encounters to dancing and talking shit ... all non-issues for a winning program. Washington had many of these, and other, issues when I was in school and nobody spent any real time talking about it.
Nobody cares about the lawnmower if we win. If all that shit happens on winning teams, and it does, then it's not an issue.
That is all. We didn't blow an 18 pt. lead because of the lawnmower. We just blew and 18 pt. lead, which makes the lawnmower look stuupid. The only issue is the team that blew the lead. But some people think that any kid who would do the lawnmower with an 18 pt. lead and time to go must be lacking in discipline and this must be symptomatic of this and that because Don James blah blah blah blah blah. Non-sense.
And you're partially wrong on another poont 2: choreographed dances are, in fact, urban and black, and whether they are cool or not depends on the final score. again, winning.
come on man.
I also read your response to say that fucking around on the sideline is not urban or black, while I maintain that the origin of that practice is most clearly and precisely that.
I think it's easier to say where we do agree: when you wind up losing, all that shit makes you look bad.
We're both playing chess here