Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Nunes highlights Dem smear campaign & Schiff’s lies and buffoonery

24

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

    The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    Imagine accusing Obama of kissing Putin's ass but not see anything wrong with the way Trump has interacted with Putin. Bitchass partisan Kunt.

    Did you miss this story from last week?
    https://time.com/5723222/trump-putin-russian-parade/
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,460 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    We need a 2 year investigation and spying on Democrats to find out! More there than in the dossier.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    We need a 2 year investigation and spying on Democrats to find out! More there than in the dossier.
    Makers are talking now.

    Takers should stay mum.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070
    edited November 2019
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

    The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
    So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    Imagine accusing Obama of kissing Putin's ass but not see anything wrong with the way Trump has interacted with Putin. Bitchass partisan Kunt.

    Did you miss this story from last week?
    https://time.com/5723222/trump-putin-russian-parade/
    Trump gave the Ukraine's lethal weapons to defend themselves. Obama gave them blankets. Suck harder IC.
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

    The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
    So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.
    And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070
    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

    The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
    So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.
    And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.
    Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 Election

    Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

    The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
    So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.
    And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.
    Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 Election

    Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?
    Lethal aid is much more useful in extorting and bribing a nation under an existential threat. Good point, comrade!
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

    The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
    So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.
    And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.
    Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 Election

    Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?
    Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Bob pulls up 3 year old articles to push a fake news story that has already been debunked. Give it up Bobby. Maybe take another shot with Pizzagate or Uranium One?
    Yeah, it's been "debunked" Care to show me where the reporter, who now works for the NYTimes has retracted this story?
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

    The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
    So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.
    And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.
    Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 Election

    Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?
    That's nice that you tout a 3 year old Politico article as the sole source of truth when it fits your agenda. They were wrong, just like your news source was wrong about Uranium One, Pizzagate, and whatever crackpot conspiracy theories @Sledog is peddling this week.
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    Bob, who has kissed Putin's ass more? Obama or Trump? Please provide examples to back up your answer.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070
    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

    The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
    So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.
    And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.
    Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 Election

    Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?
    Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.
    When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

    The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
    So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.
    And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.
    Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 Election

    Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?
    Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.
    When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.
    Considering the fact that this is one of right's favorite talking points right now, I'd expect there to be some recent reporting on it. Apparently there's nothing to report because Bob is still clinging on to 3 year old articles. Sad.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,693 Founders Club
    Imagine thinking that America gives a shit about this latest THUD of a scandal

    Where to next? Dumfuckistan?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626

    Imagine thinking that America gives a shit about this latest THUD of a scandal

    Where to next? Dumfuckistan?

    You may be right and we may have officially passed into the idiocracy zone. But bribery is a ground for impeachment explicitly stated in the Constitution and obviously presented by this case. If that THUDS for you, you should be permanently prohibited from ever lecturing any of us about American exceptionalism or ideals ever again.
  • GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

    The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
    So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.
    And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.
    Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 Election

    Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?
    Sorry my WiFi cut out on the plane...aka running and hiding. It wasn’t my testimony it was the witnesses in congresses testimony. Noted that you had to dig up a long since debunked article from three years ago though to try and make your point.
    When would you expect an article talking about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to have been written Scotty? And you saying it has been "debunked" is just another one of your lies. Politico hasn't retracted their story and neither of the reporters have said they are retracting the story.
    The reporter who wrote the article about Coats threatening to resign hasn’t retracted the story either so by your own “kunt logic” you’re conceding that stoutly hasn’t been debunked...
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,188 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    I'm enjoying the GOP strategy of pretending because Daddy got caught before his extortion scheme could have its intended effect--caught by members of both parties--there's "nothing to see here".

    I am enjoying watching you goose step to your dem leaders by adopting their terminology. "extortion" ha ha ha.......try thinking for yourself man.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    This guy sued a fake cow on Twitter

    Translation: I can’t refute anything he said but please enjoy my Kunt act
    Witnesses did that themselves by testifying there was no factual basis for Nunes conspiratard theories
    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.


    A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

    Yeah, no factual basis. Liar or moron Scotty?
    Yep. Ukrainians didn't like a candidate who argued Russia should keep territory taken from them by Russians. It's exactly the same!
    Whether they liked Trump or not wasn't the question but your obfuscation is duly noted O'Keefed.

    Btw, how much did they love Obama for refusing to provide them with any lethal aid and how little did you care when he did so?
    I cared. Did you, comrade?
    Yeah, I recall your OUTRAGE over it. Why it was so strong you never mentioned it once. Maybe you punished Obama by refusing to swallow that day. Now back to the lie. Was there in factual basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 election? Yes or no?
    I don't remember whether I mentioned it or not. Did you mention it? I seem to recall you were indifferent, blobski.

    And no, there is no basis for the ridiculous claim that Ukraine interfered in our election.
    Yeah I did. I used it as yet another example of Obama's feckless foreign policy and how he was still kissing Putin's ass. You said nothing. So then Politico is lying?
    You obviously have me confused with someone who thinks Obama had a strong grasp of foreign policy.

    The Russians launched a campaign to interfere in our election. The Ukrainians did nothing of the kind. Your team's ability to conflate the incomparable is well noted.
    So then Politico is lying. Got it. And I don't have you confused with anyone. You're the guy who didn't say shit while Obama gave them MREs and blankets to defend themselves.
    And drones and armored humvees and mortar detecting radar. He should have done more but to implicate it was just blankets and mres makes you look as stupid as Nunes did today.
    Was any of the aid he gave them lethal aid? And the person who looks stupid is the gullible Kunt who claimed there was no basis for Trump to believe that the Ukraine interfered in the 2016 Election

    Weird how you fell back on your usual MO and ran and hid like a fucking Kunt. Was Politico lying in that article Scotty or were you just running your ignorant twat of mouth again?
    Lethal aid is much more useful in extorting and bribing a nation under an existential threat. Good point, comrade!
    And yet Trump gave it to them and your cocksuck gawd did not.
Sign In or Register to comment.