Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
‘ Sheer CONTEMPT 4 members of Congress’: Vindman’s transcript makes Schiff look even worse
Options
Comments
-
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass. -
Why are you point fingers at a blog author when you yourself have lied your ass off repeatedly about this Scotty? If you're so concerned about honesty and accuracy clean up your own fucking act first.GDS said:
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? -
Odd how your care much more when you perceive GDS lying. Than when your news source lies to you.SFGbob said:
Why are you point fingers at a blog author when you yourself have lied your ass off repeatedly about this Scotty? If you're so concerned about honesty and accuracy clean up your own fucking act first.GDS said:
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? -
Not odd is how you come running to tongue Scotty's ass. My news source didn't lie to me. The "edits" were always insignificant and didn't materially alter the transcript. Scotty breathlessly came running here to report this BOMB shell, which was a big nothing burger. Btw, this "edit" is based entirely Vindman's recollection and as even he concedes the edit, if it did happen, wasn't done to hide anything or to deceive anyone and that the transcript even with the edit is a "very accurate" record of the conversation that took place which completely exposes Scotty's Chicken Little Kunt act from last week for the bullshit it always was.2001400ex said:
Odd how your care much more when you perceive GDS lying. Than when your news source lies to you.SFGbob said:
Why are you point fingers at a blog author when you yourself have lied your ass off repeatedly about this Scotty? If you're so concerned about honesty and accuracy clean up your own fucking act first.GDS said:
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? -
I'll ask again - can you post my lies about the call memo? standing by.SFGbob said:
Why are you point fingers at a blog author when you yourself have lied your ass off repeatedly about this Scotty? If you're so concerned about honesty and accuracy clean up your own fucking act first.GDS said:
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? -
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? Because I hear the "edits" were so substantial that we can no longer call it that.GDS said:
I'll ask again - can you post my lies about the call memo? standing by.SFGbob said:
Why are you point fingers at a blog author when you yourself have lied your ass off repeatedly about this Scotty? If you're so concerned about honesty and accuracy clean up your own fucking act first.GDS said:
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? -
Not if you want to be accurate. The title of the document states "Memorandum of telephone conversation" (memo being short for memorandum...) and on the bottom of the first page it clearly states "a memorandum of a telephone converstaion (telcon) is not a verbatim transcript". What's the delay in posting all my repeated lies about the memo?SFGbob said:
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? Because I hear the "edits" were so substantial that we can no longer call it that.GDS said:
I'll ask again - can you post my lies about the call memo? standing by.SFGbob said:
Why are you point fingers at a blog author when you yourself have lied your ass off repeatedly about this Scotty? If you're so concerned about honesty and accuracy clean up your own fucking act first.GDS said:
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? -
We've always known it wasn't a verbatim transcript liar. You said the fact that Vindman said it had been edited meant that we could no longer even call it a transcript. You also claimed that these "edits" hid some important detail from the phone conversation.GDS said:
Not if you want to be accurate. The title of the document states "Memorandum of telephone conversation" (memo being short for memorandum...) and on the bottom of the first page it clearly states "a memorandum of a telephone converstaion (telcon) is not a verbatim transcript". What's the delay in posting all my repeated lies about the memo?SFGbob said:
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? Because I hear the "edits" were so substantial that we can no longer call it that.GDS said:
I'll ask again - can you post my lies about the call memo? standing by.SFGbob said:
Why are you point fingers at a blog author when you yourself have lied your ass off repeatedly about this Scotty? If you're so concerned about honesty and accuracy clean up your own fucking act first.GDS said:
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt?
-
So you've always known it wasn't a transcript but now want to know if you can call it a transcript....FS...and now you lie about what I said. Lying sack of shit. I pointed out that Vindman testifying that it had been edited means you can't claim it hasn't been edited based upon his testimony.SFGbob said:
We've always known it wasn't a verbatim transcript liar. You said the fact that Vindman said it had been edited meant that we could no longer even call it a transcript. You also claimed that these "edits" hid some important detail from the phone conversation.GDS said:
Not if you want to be accurate. The title of the document states "Memorandum of telephone conversation" (memo being short for memorandum...) and on the bottom of the first page it clearly states "a memorandum of a telephone converstaion (telcon) is not a verbatim transcript". What's the delay in posting all my repeated lies about the memo?SFGbob said:
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? Because I hear the "edits" were so substantial that we can no longer call it that.GDS said:
I'll ask again - can you post my lies about the call memo? standing by.SFGbob said:
Why are you point fingers at a blog author when you yourself have lied your ass off repeatedly about this Scotty? If you're so concerned about honesty and accuracy clean up your own fucking act first.GDS said:
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? -
At least now we can stop calling it a transcript.GDS said:
So you've always known it wasn't a transcript but now want to know if you can call it a transcript....FS...and now you lie about what I said. Lying sack of shit. I pointed out that Vindman testifying that it had been edited means you can't claim it hasn't been edited based upon his testimony.SFGbob said:
We've always known it wasn't a verbatim transcript liar. You said the fact that Vindman said it had been edited meant that we could no longer even call it a transcript. You also claimed that these "edits" hid some important detail from the phone conversation.GDS said:
Not if you want to be accurate. The title of the document states "Memorandum of telephone conversation" (memo being short for memorandum...) and on the bottom of the first page it clearly states "a memorandum of a telephone converstaion (telcon) is not a verbatim transcript". What's the delay in posting all my repeated lies about the memo?SFGbob said:
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? Because I hear the "edits" were so substantial that we can no longer call it that.GDS said:
I'll ask again - can you post my lies about the call memo? standing by.SFGbob said:
Why are you point fingers at a blog author when you yourself have lied your ass off repeatedly about this Scotty? If you're so concerned about honesty and accuracy clean up your own fucking act first.GDS said:
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt?
You must have missed the news. We know it’s not a transcript now.
That the memo of the call was incomplete. In the memo Trump asks about investigating Biden then Zelensky replies the next prosecutor he brings in will look into the company, but Trump doesn't mention Burisma according to the memo.
speaking of lies - it's not a transcript.
There are pages of threads where you and O'Keefed tongue each other's bungholes over what a HUGE story this is. Go fuck yourself Scotty. -
and yet in this very thread you acknowledge it's not a transcript but somehow I'm lying when I point out it's not a transcript. Heal yourself you lying sack of shit.SFGbob said:
At least now we can stop calling it a transcript.GDS said:
So you've always known it wasn't a transcript but now want to know if you can call it a transcript....FS...and now you lie about what I said. Lying sack of shit. I pointed out that Vindman testifying that it had been edited means you can't claim it hasn't been edited based upon his testimony.SFGbob said:
We've always known it wasn't a verbatim transcript liar. You said the fact that Vindman said it had been edited meant that we could no longer even call it a transcript. You also claimed that these "edits" hid some important detail from the phone conversation.GDS said:
Not if you want to be accurate. The title of the document states "Memorandum of telephone conversation" (memo being short for memorandum...) and on the bottom of the first page it clearly states "a memorandum of a telephone converstaion (telcon) is not a verbatim transcript". What's the delay in posting all my repeated lies about the memo?SFGbob said:
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? Because I hear the "edits" were so substantial that we can no longer call it that.GDS said:
I'll ask again - can you post my lies about the call memo? standing by.SFGbob said:
Why are you point fingers at a blog author when you yourself have lied your ass off repeatedly about this Scotty? If you're so concerned about honesty and accuracy clean up your own fucking act first.GDS said:
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt?
You must have missed the news. We know it’s not a transcript now.
That the memo of the call was incomplete. In the memo Trump asks about investigating Biden then Zelensky replies the next prosecutor he brings in will look into the company, but Trump doesn't mention Burisma according to the memo.
speaking of lies - it's not a transcript.
There are pages of threads where you and O'Keefed tongue each other's bungholes over what a HUGE story this is. Go fuck yourself Scotty. -
Fuck you're as bad if not worse than Hondo. He at least has the excuse of being a retard. It's not a verbatim transcripts. No one has ever said it was a verbatim transcript. It's is a transcript of a the phone call.GDS said:
and yet in this very thread you acknowledge it's not a transcript but somehow I'm lying when I point out it's not a transcript. Heal yourself you lying sack of shit.SFGbob said:
At least now we can stop calling it a transcript.GDS said:
So you've always known it wasn't a transcript but now want to know if you can call it a transcript....FS...and now you lie about what I said. Lying sack of shit. I pointed out that Vindman testifying that it had been edited means you can't claim it hasn't been edited based upon his testimony.SFGbob said:
We've always known it wasn't a verbatim transcript liar. You said the fact that Vindman said it had been edited meant that we could no longer even call it a transcript. You also claimed that these "edits" hid some important detail from the phone conversation.GDS said:
Not if you want to be accurate. The title of the document states "Memorandum of telephone conversation" (memo being short for memorandum...) and on the bottom of the first page it clearly states "a memorandum of a telephone converstaion (telcon) is not a verbatim transcript". What's the delay in posting all my repeated lies about the memo?SFGbob said:
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? Because I hear the "edits" were so substantial that we can no longer call it that.GDS said:
I'll ask again - can you post my lies about the call memo? standing by.SFGbob said:
Why are you point fingers at a blog author when you yourself have lied your ass off repeatedly about this Scotty? If you're so concerned about honesty and accuracy clean up your own fucking act first.GDS said:
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt?
You must have missed the news. We know it’s not a transcript now.
That the memo of the call was incomplete. In the memo Trump asks about investigating Biden then Zelensky replies the next prosecutor he brings in will look into the company, but Trump doesn't mention Burisma according to the memo.
speaking of lies - it's not a transcript.
There are pages of threads where you and O'Keefed tongue each other's bungholes over what a HUGE story this is. Go fuck yourself Scotty. -
Ironic post is ironic.SFGbob said:
Fuck you're as bad if not worse than Hondo. He at least has the excuse of being a retard. It's not a verbatim transcripts. No one has ever said it was a verbatim transcript. It's is a transcript of a the phone call.GDS said:
and yet in this very thread you acknowledge it's not a transcript but somehow I'm lying when I point out it's not a transcript. Heal yourself you lying sack of shit.SFGbob said:
At least now we can stop calling it a transcript.GDS said:
So you've always known it wasn't a transcript but now want to know if you can call it a transcript....FS...and now you lie about what I said. Lying sack of shit. I pointed out that Vindman testifying that it had been edited means you can't claim it hasn't been edited based upon his testimony.SFGbob said:
We've always known it wasn't a verbatim transcript liar. You said the fact that Vindman said it had been edited meant that we could no longer even call it a transcript. You also claimed that these "edits" hid some important detail from the phone conversation.GDS said:
Not if you want to be accurate. The title of the document states "Memorandum of telephone conversation" (memo being short for memorandum...) and on the bottom of the first page it clearly states "a memorandum of a telephone converstaion (telcon) is not a verbatim transcript". What's the delay in posting all my repeated lies about the memo?SFGbob said:
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt? Because I hear the "edits" were so substantial that we can no longer call it that.GDS said:
I'll ask again - can you post my lies about the call memo? standing by.SFGbob said:
Why are you point fingers at a blog author when you yourself have lied your ass off repeatedly about this Scotty? If you're so concerned about honesty and accuracy clean up your own fucking act first.GDS said:
So you can't even correctly acknowledge the blog author in deej's link lies from the jump...pathetic. Post my lies about the call memo.SFGbob said:
Pretty funny how you've lied your ass off repeatedly about the transcript and the edits to that transcript but now pretend to get all upset about the blog authors misstatements. Why don't you clean up the bullshit you've stated here on this board first Kunt and then we can discuss the blog author.GDS said:
Blob - when the blog author writes the transcript "was not edited" based solely upon Vindman's testimony is that a true or false statement? This isn't hard unless you are a lying piece of shit.....SFGbob said:
Tell us how the "edit" materially altered the content, Scotty? The "edit" was minor and insignificant and as Vindman states it wasn't edited due to any malicious intent, refuting another one of your earlier lies, and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation, refuting yet another of your lies.GDS said:
Doesn't change the fact that Vindman testified the memo was edited yet the blog author in Deej's post lied about the testimony in his very next sentence. Weird how you left that our Blob. Fucking lying piece of shit.SFGbob said:
And that the "edit" wasn't due to malicious intent and that the transcript was a "very accurate" record of the conversation. Weird how you left that out Scotty. Fucking lying piece of shit.GDS said:Deej's "damning blog post" is pure bullshit. The first tweeted portion of the transcript clearly shows that Vindman testified the memo summary of the call was edited and the blog author then writes the memo wasn't edited per the testimony clearly lying about what the tweeted portion of the transcript states. Fucking hell Deej...
A person with an ounce of shame would have admitted they'd been talking out their ass.
Can we call it a transcript again Kunt?
You must have missed the news. We know it’s not a transcript now.
That the memo of the call was incomplete. In the memo Trump asks about investigating Biden then Zelensky replies the next prosecutor he brings in will look into the company, but Trump doesn't mention Burisma according to the memo.
speaking of lies - it's not a transcript.
There are pages of threads where you and O'Keefed tongue each other's bungholes over what a HUGE story this is. Go fuck yourself Scotty. -
The only way to clean it up permanently is to completely dismantle and destroy the current education system, and replace the leftist indoctrination with actual learning and critical thinking skills.Sledog said:KGB tactics in America's Congress. Hondo Bros cheer. The left cheers. The left is now openly communist/socialist. They have support from the low IQ crowd, illegals and criminals.
Never thought I would see this in my lifetime. It's going to have to be cleaned up.
