Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
What does your news source tell you?
pawz
Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515
in Tug Tavern
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-media-protected-jeffrey-epstein-and-crucified-brett-kavanaugh
#HondoBros #triggered #butwhydoesntanyonetrustmsm
#HondoBros #triggered #butwhydoesntanyonetrustmsm
Comments
-
This comparison tells you all you need to know about rats and their media. They are the corrupt assholes we always knew they were.
-
Why didn't the Washington examiner or Fox news run the Epstein story three years ago?
-
Maybe because they didn't have the scoop that ABC had. Now, you tell me why ABC sat on the story they had Hondo. And go fuck yourself.2001400ex said:Why didn't the Washington examiner or Fox news run the Epstein story three years ago?
-
So all the conservative news sources are lazy. Got it.SFGbob said:
Maybe because they didn't have the scoop that ABC had. Now, you tell me why ABC sat on the story they had Hondo. And go fuck yourself.2001400ex said:Why didn't the Washington examiner or Fox news run the Epstein story three years ago?
-
Hondo illustrates why Epstein and Weinstein were protected
Hillary -
Yeah that's it Kunt. The Washington Post broke the Watergate story because the NYTimes was lazy. Now answer the question you dodged Kunt. Why did ABC sit on this story? Why did it take O'Keefe to break this story? Are liberal news sources lazy dumbfuck?2001400ex said:
So all the conservative news sources are lazy. Got it.SFGbob said:
Maybe because they didn't have the scoop that ABC had. Now, you tell me why ABC sat on the story they had Hondo. And go fuck yourself.2001400ex said:Why didn't the Washington examiner or Fox news run the Epstein story three years ago?
-
Yes liberal news sources are lazy. But you are an idiot if you think no other news source knew about this. Idiot.SFGbob said:
Yeah that's it Kunt. The Washington Post broke the Watergate story because the NYTimes was lazy. Now answer the question you dodged Kunt. Why did ABC sit on this story? Why did it take O'Keefe to break this story? Are liberal news sources lazy dumbfuck?2001400ex said:
So all the conservative news sources are lazy. Got it.SFGbob said:
Maybe because they didn't have the scoop that ABC had. Now, you tell me why ABC sat on the story they had Hondo. And go fuck yourself.2001400ex said:Why didn't the Washington examiner or Fox news run the Epstein story three years ago?
-
I think you're a fucking Kunt who would happily chew off El Monte's pecker before you ever answered the question you were asked.2001400ex said:
Yes liberal news sources are lazy. But you are an idiot if you think no other news source knew about this. Idiot.SFGbob said:
Yeah that's it Kunt. The Washington Post broke the Watergate story because the NYTimes was lazy. Now answer the question you dodged Kunt. Why did ABC sit on this story? Why did it take O'Keefe to break this story? Are liberal news sources lazy dumbfuck?2001400ex said:
So all the conservative news sources are lazy. Got it.SFGbob said:
Maybe because they didn't have the scoop that ABC had. Now, you tell me why ABC sat on the story they had Hondo. And go fuck yourself.2001400ex said:Why didn't the Washington examiner or Fox news run the Epstein story three years ago?
-
The article states why they sat on it. Probably the exact same reasons Fox news and the rest didn't run it. Seriously, are you that fucking dumb?SFGbob said:
I think you're a fucking Kunt who would happily chew off El Monte's pecker before you ever answered the question you were asked.2001400ex said:
Yes liberal news sources are lazy. But you are an idiot if you think no other news source knew about this. Idiot.SFGbob said:
Yeah that's it Kunt. The Washington Post broke the Watergate story because the NYTimes was lazy. Now answer the question you dodged Kunt. Why did ABC sit on this story? Why did it take O'Keefe to break this story? Are liberal news sources lazy dumbfuck?2001400ex said:
So all the conservative news sources are lazy. Got it.SFGbob said:
Maybe because they didn't have the scoop that ABC had. Now, you tell me why ABC sat on the story they had Hondo. And go fuck yourself.2001400ex said:Why didn't the Washington examiner or Fox news run the Epstein story three years ago?
-
Imagine running cover for a news organization that ran cover for a pedophile.2001400ex said:
The article states why they sat on it. Probably the exact same reasons Fox news and the rest didn't run it. Seriously, are you that fucking dumb?SFGbob said:
I think you're a fucking Kunt who would happily chew off El Monte's pecker before you ever answered the question you were asked.2001400ex said:
Yes liberal news sources are lazy. But you are an idiot if you think no other news source knew about this. Idiot.SFGbob said:
Yeah that's it Kunt. The Washington Post broke the Watergate story because the NYTimes was lazy. Now answer the question you dodged Kunt. Why did ABC sit on this story? Why did it take O'Keefe to break this story? Are liberal news sources lazy dumbfuck?2001400ex said:
So all the conservative news sources are lazy. Got it.SFGbob said:
Maybe because they didn't have the scoop that ABC had. Now, you tell me why ABC sat on the story they had Hondo. And go fuck yourself.2001400ex said:Why didn't the Washington examiner or Fox news run the Epstein story three years ago?



