It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
2001400ex said:Good. We cut out CFCs in the 90s, of course the ozone hole is getting smaller. What am I supposed to be angry about?
Good. We cut out CFCs in the 90s, of course the ozone hole is getting smaller. What am I supposed to be angry about?
ThomasFremont said: 2001400ex said:Good. We cut out CFCs in the 90s, of course the ozone hole is getting smaller. What am I supposed to be angry about? It’s like, scientists identified a problem and we DID SOMETHING.But at what cost? Lynnwood hair was never the same after this.AT WHAT COST!?!?!?
2001400ex said: ThomasFremont said: 2001400ex said:Good. We cut out CFCs in the 90s, of course the ozone hole is getting smaller. What am I supposed to be angry about? It’s like, scientists identified a problem and we DID SOMETHING.But at what cost? Lynnwood hair was never the same after this.AT WHAT COST!?!?!? The best part is, pawz thinks the hole in the ozone is related to the current discussion on climate change.
pawz said: 2001400ex said: ThomasFremont said: 2001400ex said:Good. We cut out CFCs in the 90s, of course the ozone hole is getting smaller. What am I supposed to be angry about? It’s like, scientists identified a problem and we DID SOMETHING.But at what cost? Lynnwood hair was never the same after this.AT WHAT COST!?!?!? The best part is, pawz thinks the hole in the ozone is related to the current discussion on climate change. You have a hard enough time thinking for yourself. I suggest you try not to do mine too (Like you could keep up.)
Comments
What am I supposed to be angry about?
But at what cost? Lynnwood hair was never the same after this.
AT WHAT COST!?!?!?