Prager U offered AOC $100,000 to charity of her choice if she would debate Candace Owens
Comments
-
I see you can't link shit. Great argument.Rubberfist said:
It happened (the switch) because people’s perceptions of the parties stance on civil rights changed.SFGbob said:
You're entitled to your opinion Lou but you're now engaging in the very same behavior that the video criticizes Owens of engaging in. What has the right "whitewashed" about he South's past Lou? What facts aren't on my side? I'm not arguing that the South hasn't gone from a Rat stronghold to a Republican stronghold, so just what exactly are then facts that aren't on my side? Why do I need to tell you why it happened? You're the one making the allegation. Do you not know why it happened?Rubberfist said:The Southern Strategy and Switch aren't myths. That's Candace's claim. I know the Right has put a lot of effort into whitewashing the South's past but facts aren't on your side. White people in the South flipped to the Republican party and Blacks flipped to the Democratic party. You tell me why this happened.
-
If you can’t compete on skills, price and productivity, and then vote for the federal government to provide trade and economic protection through trump, then you are absolutely and unconditionally trumptrash.MikeDamone said:
CD thinks hard working blue collar union manufacturing workers are “trumptrash”CirrhosisDawg said:
A low skill uneducated third world labor force is out-competing trumptrash for jobs? Your candor is illuminating.SFGbob said:The guy criticizes her for making claims without providing evidence in support of those claims while he states completely fact free that the gap between rich and poor is on account of "right-wing" policies and this Kunt wants to talk about Owens' stunning ignorance?
How much of the gap between rich and poor in on account of allowing millions of low skill, poorly educated immigrants into this country?
He’s one disgusting piece of shit.
It would be embarrassing for the UW that a football related forum provides a platform for illiteracy and failure. Then it becomes apparent that none of the trumptrash here, or very few, ever graduated from UW. -
Help me to understand the Kunt logic here. So because black people tend to be very religious, therefore the appeal that had compeled white voters to switch to the Republican party had to be on account of the parties stance on Civil Rights and can't have anything to do with the Rats's swing to the left on cultural issues like school prayer, pornography, recreational drugs and abortion. Had to be Civil Rights.Rubberfist said:U
Last I checked black people tend to be very religious so no it had nothing to do with abortion or religion. Nice try though.SFGbob said:
Really? And it had nothing to do with the fact that the Rat party pushed further to left on issues like abortion and support for the military and became more hostile toward religion and traditional values and softer on Communism? What exactly did a Southern Democrat have in common with the McGovern wing that took over the party in 1972?Rubberfist said:
It happened (the switch) because people’s perceptions of the parties stance on civil rights changed.SFGbob said:
You're entitled to your opinion Lou but you're now engaging in the very same behavior that the video criticizes Owens of engaging in. What has the right "whitewashed" about he South's past Lou? What facts aren't on my side? I'm not arguing that the South hasn't gone from a Rat stronghold to a Republican stronghold, so just what exactly are then facts that aren't on my side? Why do I need to tell you why it happened? You're the one making the allegation. Do you not know why it happened?Rubberfist said:The Southern Strategy and Switch aren't myths. That's Candace's claim. I know the Right has put a lot of effort into whitewashing the South's past but facts aren't on your side. White people in the South flipped to the Republican party and Blacks flipped to the Democratic party. You tell me why this happened.
When did this "change" on civil rights come about?
How do you explain that in 1936 FDR got 75% of the black vote after getting less than a 1/3 in 1932? How did Eisenhower win 5 Southern States in 1956 if this "switch" came about due to the party's change on Civil Rights?
When did this change on civil rights happen?
I'll give you fair warning here and I think you already realize this. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about but I'll grant that you have very, very strong feelings that what you think you know is true, but if you continue with this I'm going to wipe the floor with your ignorant ass. -
You're such a worthless dipshit.CirrhosisDawg said:
Wtf? Incoherent and desperate nonsense.SFGbob said:
Where did I say that dumbfuck? A low skilled poorly educated work force aren't able to get jobs that earn them much money, they also depress the wages of people already here with low skills and little education. This contributes to the gap between rich and poor. The "trash" as you call them here in California are all mostly Rat party supporters.CirrhosisDawg said:
A low skill uneducated third world labor force is out-competing trumptrash for jobs? Your candor is illuminating.SFGbob said:The guy criticizes her for making claims without providing evidence in support of those claims while he states completely fact free that the gap between rich and poor is on account of "right-wing" policies and this Kunt wants to talk about Owens' stunning ignorance?
How much of the gap between rich and poor in on account of allowing millions of low skill, poorly educated immigrants into this country?
This explains everything you need to know about trumptrash.
Trump would be proud. -
You’ve been on your knees with your head in the pillow screaming for mercy all day GayBob. We see you.SFGbob said:
Help me to understand the Kunt logic here. So because black people tend to be very religious, therefore the appeal that had compeled white voters to switch Republican had to be on account of the parties stance on Civil Rights and can't have anything to do with the Rats's swing to the left on cultural issues like school prayer, pornography, recreational drugs and abortion. Had to be Civil Rights.Rubberfist said:U
Last I checked black people tend to be very religious so no it had nothing to do with abortion or religion. Nice try though.SFGbob said:
Really? And it had nothing to do with the fact that the Rat party pushed further to left on issues like abortion and support for the military and became more hostile toward religion and traditional values and softer on Communism? What exactly did a Southern Democrat have in common with the McGovern wing that took over the party in 1972?Rubberfist said:
It happened (the switch) because people’s perceptions of the parties stance on civil rights changed.SFGbob said:
You're entitled to your opinion Lou but you're now engaging in the very same behavior that the video criticizes Owens of engaging in. What has the right "whitewashed" about he South's past Lou? What facts aren't on my side? I'm not arguing that the South hasn't gone from a Rat stronghold to a Republican stronghold, so just what exactly are then facts that aren't on my side? Why do I need to tell you why it happened? You're the one making the allegation. Do you not know why it happened?Rubberfist said:The Southern Strategy and Switch aren't myths. That's Candace's claim. I know the Right has put a lot of effort into whitewashing the South's past but facts aren't on your side. White people in the South flipped to the Republican party and Blacks flipped to the Democratic party. You tell me why this happened.
When did this "change" on civil rights come about?
How do you explain that in 1936 FDR got 75% of the black vote after getting less than a 1/3 in 1932? How did Eisenhower win 5 Southern States in 1956 if this "switch" came about due to the party's change on Civil Rights?
When did this change on civil rights happen?
I've give you fair warning here and I think you already realize this. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about but I'll grant that you have very, very strong feelings that what you think you know is true, but if you continue with this I'm going to wipe the floor with your ignorant ass. -
They all tend to be very good dancers and quick to smile and laugh as well.MikeDamone said:
Lol. Them blacks are very religious. JFC. Could you be more racist? Nothing like lumping people into a racial stereotype. Any word on the kind of food “they” tend to enjoy?Rubberfist said:U
Last I checked black people tend to be very religious so no it had nothing to do with abortion or religion. Nice try though.SFGbob said:
Really? And it had nothing to do with the fact that the Rat party pushed further to left on issues like abortion and support for the military and became more hostile toward religion and traditional values and softer on Communism? What exactly did a Southern Democrat have in common with the McGovern wing that took over the party in 1972?Rubberfist said:
It happened (the switch) because people’s perceptions of the parties stance on civil rights changed.SFGbob said:
You're entitled to your opinion Lou but you're now engaging in the very same behavior that the video criticizes Owens of engaging in. What has the right "whitewashed" about he South's past Lou? What facts aren't on my side? I'm not arguing that the South hasn't gone from a Rat stronghold to a Republican stronghold, so just what exactly are then facts that aren't on my side? Why do I need to tell you why it happened? You're the one making the allegation. Do you not know why it happened?Rubberfist said:The Southern Strategy and Switch aren't myths. That's Candace's claim. I know the Right has put a lot of effort into whitewashing the South's past but facts aren't on your side. White people in the South flipped to the Republican party and Blacks flipped to the Democratic party. You tell me why this happened.
When did this "change" on civil rights come about? -
Climb the stairs and then pop off!CirrhosisDawg said:
If you can’t compete on skills, price and productivity, and then vote for the federal government to provide trade and economic protection through trump, then you are absolutely and unconditionally trumptrash.MikeDamone said:
CD thinks hard working blue collar union manufacturing workers are “trumptrash”CirrhosisDawg said:
A low skill uneducated third world labor force is out-competing trumptrash for jobs? Your candor is illuminating.SFGbob said:The guy criticizes her for making claims without providing evidence in support of those claims while he states completely fact free that the gap between rich and poor is on account of "right-wing" policies and this Kunt wants to talk about Owens' stunning ignorance?
How much of the gap between rich and poor in on account of allowing millions of low skill, poorly educated immigrants into this country?
He’s one disgusting piece of shit.
It would be embarrassing for the UW that a football related forum provides a platform for illiteracy and failure. Then it becomes apparent that none of the trumptrash here, or very few, ever graduated from UW. -
Bump.SFGbob said:
Where did I say that dumbfuck? A low skilled poorly educated work force aren't able to get jobs that earn them much money, they also depress the wages of people already here with low skills and little education. This contributes to the gap between rich and poor. The "trash" as you call them here in California are all mostly Rat party supporters.CirrhosisDawg said:
A low skill uneducated third world labor force is out-competing trumptrash for jobs? Your candor is illuminating.SFGbob said:The guy criticizes her for making claims without providing evidence in support of those claims while he states completely fact free that the gap between rich and poor is on account of "right-wing" policies and this Kunt wants to talk about Owens' stunning ignorance?
How much of the gap between rich and poor in on account of allowing millions of low skill, poorly educated immigrants into this country?
Hey GayBob, you’ve conveniently overlooked a trail of your patented idiocy and illiteracy. I understand why you want to change the topic. You are getting gang raped. But you still haven’t answered the replies to this post. -
@MikeDamone can you interpret what your illiterate white trash friend is trying to say here? Tia.SFGbob said:
Where did I say that dumbfuck? A low skilled poorly educated work force aren't able to get jobs that earn them much money, they also depress the wages of people already here with low skills and little education. This contributes to the gap between rich and poor. The "trash" as you call them here in California are all mostly Rat party supporters.CirrhosisDawg said:
A low skill uneducated third world labor force is out-competing trumptrash for jobs? Your candor is illuminating.SFGbob said:The guy criticizes her for making claims without providing evidence in support of those claims while he states completely fact free that the gap between rich and poor is on account of "right-wing" policies and this Kunt wants to talk about Owens' stunning ignorance?
How much of the gap between rich and poor in on account of allowing millions of low skill, poorly educated immigrants into this country? -
Explains why a fucking moron like you can never refute anything I've ever said and doesn't even try to address anything I've said.CirrhosisDawg said:
Bump.SFGbob said:
Where did I say that dumbfuck? A low skilled poorly educated work force aren't able to get jobs that earn them much money, they also depress the wages of people already here with low skills and little education. This contributes to the gap between rich and poor. The "trash" as you call them here in California are all mostly Rat party supporters.CirrhosisDawg said:
A low skill uneducated third world labor force is out-competing trumptrash for jobs? Your candor is illuminating.SFGbob said:The guy criticizes her for making claims without providing evidence in support of those claims while he states completely fact free that the gap between rich and poor is on account of "right-wing" policies and this Kunt wants to talk about Owens' stunning ignorance?
How much of the gap between rich and poor in on account of allowing millions of low skill, poorly educated immigrants into this country?
Hey GayBob, you’ve conveniently overlooked a trail of your patented idiocy and illiteracy. I understand why you want to change the topic. You are getting gang raped. But you still haven’t answered the replies to this post.
