Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Why?

backthepack
backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
in Hardcore Husky Board
Why take the ball out of Eason’s hands after we got up 14? We played not to lose. Fuck your conservative beta bullshit Pete
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    backthepack said:

    Why take the ball out of Eason’s hands after we got up 14? We played not to lose. Fuck your conservative beta bullshit Pete

    Disagree. Playing not to lose is a bullshit euphemism. We played to lose slowly, but we didn't do it slowly enough.

    Playing not to lose means trying to win.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778
    Better get on that math homework kiddo.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Another completed bomb to Chin at pretty much any point in time would have won us the game. Glad we tried it once, it only went for 50 yards and a TD.

    Watching this team is a case study in unused potential

    Dude why take the ball out of your best players hands? And then you run wildcat with your 4th string RB? What the fuck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    Mad_Son said:

    backthepack said:

    Why take the ball out of Eason’s hands after we got up 14? We played not to lose. Fuck your conservative beta bullshit Pete

    Disagree. Playing not to lose is a bullshit euphemism. We played to lose slowly, but we didn't do it slowly enough.

    Playing not to lose means trying to win.
    I'd love to hear your hot take here @DerekJohnson
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,209 Founders Club
    Mad_Son said:

    Mad_Son said:

    backthepack said:

    Why take the ball out of Eason’s hands after we got up 14? We played not to lose. Fuck your conservative beta bullshit Pete

    Disagree. Playing not to lose is a bullshit euphemism. We played to lose slowly, but we didn't do it slowly enough.

    Playing not to lose means trying to win.
    I'd love to hear your hot take here @DerekJohnson
    I thought you were nitpicking with what he was saying.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    DerekJohnson said:

    Mad_Son said:

    Mad_Son said:

    backthepack said:

    Why take the ball out of Eason’s hands after we got up 14? We played not to lose. Fuck your conservative beta bullshit Pete

    Disagree. Playing not to lose is a bullshit euphemism. We played to lose slowly, but we didn't do it slowly enough.

    Playing not to lose means trying to win.
    I'd love to hear your hot take here @DerekJohnson
    I thought you were nitpicking with what he was saying.
    Ok. Well you were wrong. Playing not to lose needs to leave our collective lexicon for exactly the reasons I said. That was a tangent and not directed at btp

    I get it though. The internet is a tough medium for the intended tone. I was afraid you were going to defend what Pete did which perplexed me given your reaction to the other posts here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    RoadDawg55 said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    Another completed bomb to Chin at pretty much any point in time would have won us the game. Glad we tried it once, it only went for 50 yards and a TD.

    Watching this team is a case study in unused potential

    I mean, you can’t just run that okay but it is strange that Chin caught the TD and I swear he didn’t okay again for another 4 drives.
    I'm pretty sure he didn't come back in until late 4th quarter. If he did it was maybe one or two plays.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter