UO runs (with who?) 35-45 times they win rather easily
That's the question.
I don't think that matters
UW has new starters across the defense but the secondary is still the strength such as it is. And I don't trust Hubert.
Anyone we have played has had success running but abandoned it. UO has a SEC line.
Now,if UW can get a lead things could be different
Either way I think this game is very interesting. The season either continues or ends on Saturday
Pretty much.
You don't trust Hubert ? As in, he shows up and plays well? Or he shits the bed?
Are you skeptical about Oregon's vaunted O line? Your sarcasm is known to be at such a level of sophistication that it can sometimes fly even over the head of a sophisticated and experienced consumer of said sarcasm such as myself.
I think Hanson and, for sure Sewell, are real-deal guys. Throckmorton seems good but he's always more celebrated for his rare versatility on the line, which is nice to have a guy who can do that, but it doesn't mean he's dominant at any one of them.
UO runs (with who?) 35-45 times they win rather easily
That's the question.
I don't think that matters
UW has new starters across the defense but the secondary is still the strength such as it is. And I don't trust Hubert.
Anyone we have played has had success running but abandoned it. UO has a SEC line.
Now,if UW can get a lead things could be different
Either way I think this game is very interesting. The season either continues or ends on Saturday
Pretty much.
You don't trust Hubert ? As in, he shows up and plays well? Or he shits the bed?
Are you skeptical about Oregon's vaunted O line? Your sarcasm is known to be at such a level of sophistication that it can sometimes fly even over the head of a sophisticated and experienced consumer of said sarcasm such as myself.
I think Hanson and, for sure Sewell, are real-deal guys. Throckmorton seems good but he's always more celebrated for his rare versatility on the line, which is nice to have a guy who can do that, but it doesn't mean he's dominant at any one of them.
SEC line is sarkasm
But their O line is Pac 12 tuff so far and they like to run. It is our? weakness in stopping it
UO runs (with who?) 35-45 times they win rather easily
That's the question.
I don't think that matters
UW has new starters across the defense but the secondary is still the strength such as it is. And I don't trust Hubert.
Anyone we have played has had success running but abandoned it. UO has a SEC line.
Now,if UW can get a lead things could be different
Either way I think this game is very interesting. The season either continues or ends on Saturday
Pretty much.
You don't trust Hubert ? As in, he shows up and plays well? Or he shits the bed?
Are you skeptical about Oregon's vaunted O line? Your sarcasm is known to be at such a level of sophistication that it can sometimes fly even over the head of a sophisticated and experienced consumer of said sarcasm such as myself.
I think Hanson and, for sure Sewell, are real-deal guys. Throckmorton seems good but he's always more celebrated for his rare versatility on the line, which is nice to have a guy who can do that, but it doesn't mean he's dominant at any one of them.
SEC line is sarkasm
But their O line is Pac 12 tuff so far and they like to run. It is our? weakness in stopping it
Yeah, he is mistake-prone. Not to Browning level, but he's two of that very same play you showed, and both were game deciding fuck ups. "Can't have it" - level mistakes from timing and game circumstance standpoint. The Stanford one absolutely cost them the game. They go in on that one it's over. Auburn a little less clear, but still critical.
That’s the formula, but because of a hyped up crowd hopefully we can slow the run early. If we do that and actually get some early points, we will be in a good position to win.
Oregon isn’t that good. We aren’t either, but we can beat them.
Comments
https://www.oregonlive.com/sports/2019/10/if-oregon-quarterback-justin-herbert-wants-to-silence-the-doubters-this-is-the-time-issues-answers.html
The chances are good since they've done exactly that the last three games.
UW has new starters across the defense but the secondary is still the strength such as it is. And I don't trust Hubert.
Anyone we have played has had success running but abandoned it. UO has a SEC line.
Now,if UW can get a lead things could be different
Either way I think this game is very interesting. The season either continues or ends on Saturday
You don't trust Hubert ? As in, he shows up and plays well? Or he shits the bed?
Are you skeptical about Oregon's vaunted O line? Your sarcasm is known to be at such a level of sophistication that it can sometimes fly even over the head of a sophisticated and experienced consumer of said sarcasm such as myself.
I think Hanson and, for sure Sewell, are real-deal guys. Throckmorton seems good but he's always more celebrated for his rare versatility on the line, which is nice to have a guy who can do that, but it doesn't mean he's dominant at any one of them.
SEC line is sarkasm
But their O line is Pac 12 tuff so far and they like to run. It is our? weakness in stopping it
Oregon isn’t that good. We aren’t either, but we can beat them.
(Weak) Tryon - Levi - Tuli - Bronson - Potato (Strong)
Mike area - Asa/Ngata/Mckinney
Striker - Bryant OR Asa
Nickel - Molden
DB - Mcduffie, Taylor, Gordon/Dom
If the LBers are on the field being run at UW is giving up 7+ yards a carry.
13 of the last 15.
Bitch.
@Ballz