Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Never-Before-Seen Trump Tax Documents Show Major Inconsistencies

insinceredawg
insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
Committing tax fraud makes him smart, right Trumptards?

https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-inc-podcast-never-before-seen-trump-tax-documents-show-major-inconsistencies

Documents obtained by ProPublica show stark differences in how Donald Trump’s businesses reported some expenses, profits and occupancy figures for two Manhattan buildings, giving a lender different figures than they provided to New York City tax authorities. The discrepancies made the buildings appear more profitable to the lender — and less profitable to the officials who set the buildings’ property tax.

For instance, Trump told the lender that he took in twice as much rent from one building as he reported to tax authorities during the same year, 2017. He also gave conflicting occupancy figures for one of his signature skyscrapers, located at 40 Wall Street.

Lenders like to see a rising occupancy level as a sign of what they call “leasing momentum.” Sure enough, the company told a lender that 40 Wall Street had been 58.9% leased on Dec. 31, 2012, and then rose to 95% a few years later. The company told tax officials the building was 81% rented as of Jan. 5, 2013.

A dozen real estate professionals told ProPublica they saw no clear explanation for multiple inconsistencies in the documents. The discrepancies are “versions of fraud,” said Nancy Wallace, a professor of finance and real estate at the Haas School of Business at the University of California-Berkeley. “This kind of stuff is not OK.”

New York City’s property tax forms state that the person signing them “affirms the truth of the statements made” and that “false filings are subject to all applicable civil and criminal penalties.” The punishments for lying to tax officials, or to lenders, can be significant, ranging from fines to criminal fraud charges. Two former Trump associates, Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort, are serving prison time for offenses that include falsifying tax and bank records, some of them related to real estate.
«1

Comments

  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Doesn't necessarily mean tax fraud. Could be bank fraud.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    No one said trump is a good or honest person. Trumptards support his policies.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,965 Standard Supporter
    Haven't looked much - but just glancing at the picture accompanying the video clearly shows the word "accrual" on the Insurance expense line.

    This is a pretty normal business practice to have one set of books for Tax and another for Book (accrual-based accounting). There's limits as to how much and who can be a cash-basis taxpayer and who has to be accrual. But it's not at all unusual.

    If you don't know shit about finance or accounting....AAAARRRGHG two sets of books....FRAUD!!!....AAAAARGH Trump.



  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2019
    Did the IRS or NYRS see the documents?
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    I'm going to need to hear from the boreds resident fake accountant to know if they really got 'em this time.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    edited October 2019
    So Propublica got the documents before the IRS? Sounds legit
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,219
    edited October 2019
    Why did the Obama IRS allow Trump to get away with this?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    edited October 2019

    Haven't looked much - but just glancing at the picture accompanying the video clearly shows the word "accrual" on the Insurance expense line.

    This is a pretty normal business practice to have one set of books for Tax and another for Book (accrual-based accounting). There's limits as to how much and who can be a cash-basis taxpayer and who has to be accrual. But it's not at all unusual.

    If you don't know shit about finance or accounting....AAAARRRGHG two sets of books....FRAUD!!!....AAAAARGH Trump.



    You are correct. That being said, occupancy rates don't change based on the method of accounting. And the type of business, being a building with leases, there are not wild swings in tax to accrual basis.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,965 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Haven't looked much - but just glancing at the picture accompanying the video clearly shows the word "accrual" on the Insurance expense line.

    This is a pretty normal business practice to have one set of books for Tax and another for Book (accrual-based accounting). There's limits as to how much and who can be a cash-basis taxpayer and who has to be accrual. But it's not at all unusual.

    If you don't know shit about finance or accounting....AAAARRRGHG two sets of books....FRAUD!!!....AAAAARGH Trump.



    You are correct. That being said, occupancy rates don't change based on the method of accounting. And the type of business, being a building with leases, there are not wild swings in tax to accrual basis.
    Would have to spend a ton more time on this to rebutt or not - and i'm not getting paid enough to analyze Trump's tax returns, sources of repayment and lease rolls.

    It's possible there's wild occupancy rate swings if, for instance, a tenant knocks down a few floors and then moves in/out.

    I am a mercenary, however, and would do that kind of stuff for cash money. So hit me with either Venmo or a gofundme and I can make it say what needs to be said. Don't care either way - red money cashes the same as blue money.



  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,026
    There is so much stupid in that link not sure where to start...for folks with TDS it is somehow surprising people would sign leases at the beginning of the year (one of the big "gotchas" is the lease occupancy is 60% in 2012 and 80% in 2013, and 95% a few years later).

    Sounds sinister...

    And somehow it is "shocking" that they paid $744k in "insurance", but paid $460k in "property insurance". Because...you know...the only kind of insurance around is property insurance.

    HondoBros unite...you have some stupid to put on display...