Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
«13

Comments

  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    They tripped, fell and landed in the shredder.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,067 Standard Supporter
    They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.

    Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,356 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.

    Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.
    Which investigation is this? The Biden one? Or the obstruction of justice one? Is there another new one? How are Trump's tax returns relevant?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.

    Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.
    Which investigation is this? The Biden one? Or the obstruction of justice one? Is there another new one? How are Trump's tax returns relevant?
    How were Hillary's emails relevant to Benghazi? How was Weiner's emails relevant to Hillary a week before the election?

    That being said, Trump's tax returns are relevant to the emoluments clause. Have you heard of it? Not to mention, if there is nothing to hide, why not just release them like every other president.
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,356 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.

    Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.
    Which investigation is this? The Biden one? Or the obstruction of justice one? Is there another new one? How are Trump's tax returns relevant?
    How were Hillary's emails relevant to Benghazi? How was Weiner's emails relevant to Hillary a week before the election?

    That being said, Trump's tax returns are relevant to the emoluments clause. Have you heard of it? Not to mention, if there is nothing to hide, why not just release them like every other president.
    I do not understand why you have your panties in a bunch. I asked a serious question. I read the article and did not see where it mentioned which investigation this is a part of. It says some circuit court upheld the need to give them the Manhattan DA for something? Unless I missed it. Either way, thanks for the snarky answer. Also, I never mentioned Hillary, you did. Or Weiner. Could care less about either one of them. Not relevant to this discussion.

    I am trying to understand what specific investigation is requesting Trumps tax returns and why they would be relevant to said case. If you don;t know, then just say that, vice all the snarky Hillary Wiener bullshit. TIA

    For the record, I think Trump should release his tax returns.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.

    Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.
    Which investigation is this? The Biden one? Or the obstruction of justice one? Is there another new one? How are Trump's tax returns relevant?
    How were Hillary's emails relevant to Benghazi? How was Weiner's emails relevant to Hillary a week before the election?

    That being said, Trump's tax returns are relevant to the emoluments clause. Have you heard of it? Not to mention, if there is nothing to hide, why not just release them like every other president.
    I do not understand why you have your panties in a bunch. I asked a serious question. I read the article and did not see where it mentioned which investigation this is a part of. It says some circuit court upheld the need to give them the Manhattan DA for something? Unless I missed it. Either way, thanks for the snarky answer. Also, I never mentioned Hillary, you did. Or Weiner. Could care less about either one of them. Not relevant to this discussion.

    I am trying to understand what specific investigation is requesting Trumps tax returns and why they would be relevant to said case. If you don;t know, then just say that, vice all the snarky Hillary Wiener bullshit. TIA

    For the record, I think Trump should release his tax returns.
    Lol you wanted a serious answer but responded with but but but Biden!!! Come on man, Biden is as relevant as Hillary to this question.

    I don't think his tax returns are relevant to the Ukraine deal. They are relevant to discussion on emoluments and his position in office. I'm not sure I connected Ukraine to his tax returns either.

    That being said, I'm not sure if this story is true or why it matters his bank destroyed the records that Im sure his accountant has.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.

    Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.
    Which investigation is this? The Biden one? Or the obstruction of justice one? Is there another new one? How are Trump's tax returns relevant?
    How were Hillary's emails relevant to Benghazi? How was Weiner's emails relevant to Hillary a week before the election?

    That being said, Trump's tax returns are relevant to the emoluments clause. Have you heard of it? Not to mention, if there is nothing to hide, why not just release them like every other president.
    I do not understand why you have your panties in a bunch. I asked a serious question. I read the article and did not see where it mentioned which investigation this is a part of. It says some circuit court upheld the need to give them the Manhattan DA for something? Unless I missed it. Either way, thanks for the snarky answer. Also, I never mentioned Hillary, you did. Or Weiner. Could care less about either one of them. Not relevant to this discussion.

    I am trying to understand what specific investigation is requesting Trumps tax returns and why they would be relevant to said case. If you don;t know, then just say that, vice all the snarky Hillary Wiener bullshit. TIA

    For the record, I think Trump should release his tax returns.
    Lol you wanted a serious answer but responded with but but but Biden!!! Come on man, Biden is as relevant as Hillary to this question.

    I don't think his tax returns are relevant to the Ukraine deal. They are relevant to discussion on emoluments and his position in office. I'm not sure I connected Ukraine to his tax returns either.

    That being said, I'm not sure if this story is true or why it matters his bank destroyed the records that Im sure his accountant has.
    Wait, what? I specifically asked if this was involved with the Biden investigation. I did not say but, but, Biden. Are you fucking kidding me? There is an entire Congressional investigation proceeding about a whistleblower saying Trump is trying to hurt a political opponent - BIDEN! But, but Biden my ass. I can see why everyone says you are impossible to deal with.

    Biden is completely relevant since one of the investigations into Trump IS ABOUT BIDEN. JFC.
    You asked what investigation. I answered. The one emoluments.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,067 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.

    Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.
    Sure Hillary deleting 33k emails and smashing her phone when they're under subpoena was ok. She didn't really mean to do it.

    Trump didn't destroy anything. HTH

    Fuck you're stupid.

    Democrats conducting investigations in search of a crime for 3 years. Bupkis. That's not how our system works.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.

    Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.
    Sure Hillary deleting 33k emails and smashing her phone when they're under subpoena was ok. She didn't really mean to do it.

    Trump didn't destroy anything. HTH

    Fuck you're stupid.

    Democrats conducting investigations in search of a crime for 3 years. Bupkis. That's not how our system works.
    Maybe Hilary was just saying “fuck off” because she knew the investigation was bullshit?
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.

    Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.
    Sure Hillary deleting 33k emails and smashing her phone when they're under subpoena was ok. She didn't really mean to do it.

    Trump didn't destroy anything. HTH

    Fuck you're stupid.

    Democrats conducting investigations in search of a crime for 3 years. Bupkis. That's not how our system works.
    That's how the Republicans operated from 12-16 after Benghazi. Did it miss that?
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,001 Standard Supporter
    Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,067 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.

    Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.
    Sure Hillary deleting 33k emails and smashing her phone when they're under subpoena was ok. She didn't really mean to do it.

    Trump didn't destroy anything. HTH

    Fuck you're stupid.

    Democrats conducting investigations in search of a crime for 3 years. Bupkis. That's not how our system works.
    That's how the Republicans operated from 12-16 after Benghazi. Did it miss that?
    All the stuff magically vanished. Seems dems under subpoena do criminal things.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 43,520 Standard Supporter
    Yeah
    2001400ex said:
    Shouldn’t matter at this point. Even by the IRS guidelines on record retention if the returns were prepared properly. Most assuredly they were under audit so unless they were found to be fraudulent, this is just another nothing burger. Loans were back in 2011 through 2014. Banks have slightly longer record retention but not much. They ditch that shit.

    https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/how-long-should-i-keep-records


  • HustlinOwlHustlinOwl Member Posts: 953

    Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?

    1. They were and got them out.
    2. Don't know.
    3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.

    Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,941

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    They are just saying "fuck off". Even those socialist assholes know a bullshit investigation when they see it.

    Sign sledog up for supporting destroying evidence in an investigation as long as there is an R next to their name.
    Sure Hillary deleting 33k emails and smashing her phone when they're under subpoena was ok. She didn't really mean to do it.

    Trump didn't destroy anything. HTH

    Fuck you're stupid.

    Democrats conducting investigations in search of a crime for 3 years. Bupkis. That's not how our system works.
    Maybe Hilary was just saying “fuck off” because she knew the investigation was bullshit?
    You mean the investigation that uncovered the fact that the Secretary of State was using a private email server in violation of the law? Is that the bullshit investigation you're referring to?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,067 Standard Supporter

    Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?

    1. They were and got them out.
    2. Don't know.
    3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.

    Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
    Talk about dock sucking.....
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    Why weren't planes or troops sent in? Why was the ambassador withdrawn like the Brits did? Why was it blamed on a video?

    1. They were and got them out.
    2. Don't know.
    3. CIA reports. Once survivors and CCTV was analysed the assessment was changed. Like 10 days later.

    Anything else WL? There were like 8 or 9 separate major investigations on it.
    Talk about dock sucking.....
    Do you ever feel like your news source lied to you?
Sign In or Register to comment.