Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Shocking, Scotty and the left lied about who makes up the homeless population.

SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
Standard Supporter
Do you recall the claim that only a 1/3 of the homeless population have a mental illness or substance abuse issue? Yeah, that was all bullshit by the Homeless industrial complex.


An analysis of the underlying data performed by the LA Times came up with dramatically different results. In fact the results are nearly the opposite of what was presented to officials:

The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, which conducts the annual count, narrowly interpreted the data to produce much lower numbers. In its presentation of the results to elected officials earlier this year, the agency said only 29% of the homeless population had either a mental illness or substance abuse disorder and, therefore, 71% “did not have a serious mental illness and/or report substance use disorder.”

The Times, however, found that about 67% had either a mental illness or a substance abuse disorder. Individually, substance abuse affects 46% of those living on the streets — more than three times the rate previously reported — and mental illness, including post-traumatic stress disorder, affects 51% of those living on the streets, according to the analysis…

The findings lend statistical support to the public’s frequent association of mental illness, physical disabilities and substance abuse with homelessness.


https://hotair.com/archives/john-s-2/2019/10/08/la-times-mental-illness-substance-abuse-far-common/
«1

Comments

  • Options
    CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary

    My bet is those numbers are low.


    Your bet? No facts to back it up? Great post.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 102,302
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    My bet is those numbers are low.


    Your bet? No facts to back it up? Great post.
    Article Two Section Four has the facts
  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,753
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment

    My bet is those numbers are low.

    They are. It was over 8/10 in Seattle.

    But the party of the people won’t acknowledge it. Because it shows how they have ignored mental health and addiction issues and further illustrates that they are the party of expansion and preservation of government. Not it’s citizens.

    But if people buy Their lie, they can keep saying it’s the mean rich, white guys fault and wash their hands of it.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 31,477
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    I'd say it's even higher than that. But heck I only dealt with them and the problems they cause for three decades.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    My bet is those numbers are low.

    I agree.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    salemcoog said:

    My bet is those numbers are low.

    They are. It was over 8/10 in Seattle.

    But the party of the people won’t acknowledge it. Because it shows how they have ignored mental health and addiction issues and further illustrates that they are the party of expansion and preservation of government. Not it’s citizens.

    But if people buy Their lie, they can keep saying it’s the mean rich, white guys fault and wash their hands of it.
    Hurt's their argument that it's just down on their luck people who can't afford housing therefore we need to build more "affordable" housing. If you know that 3/4s of the homeless are drug addicts and crazy people then you quickly realize that giving them a place to live isn't the answer.
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Read the article, some of their complaints about the HUD guidelines in the survey are valid but others are bunk. One, the LAT was only looking at unsheltered homeless and was excluding the sheltered homeless population. The LAT counted people who were at any point in their life told they had a mental health, ptsd, depression etc issue but claimed the issue was not long term or permanent. Therefore, if someone was told as an adolescent they had a bout of depression but now were not suffering from any mental health issue they were still counted under the LAT numbers. They also include people who otherwise answered the questions without any notes about substance abuse or mental health issue but looked like they could have a mental illness or substance abuse issue which could be helpful or could be complete bullshit.

    There's also this "But neither the UCLA study nor the Times analysis suggests that these disabilities and health conditions alone cause people to end up on the streets. Elected officials and researchers largely agree that California’s affordable housing crisis and poverty are the primary drivers of homelessness."
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    1/3, you swallowed pure bullshit Scotty. 2/3s of the homeless aren't families living in their cars and motor homes.
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    1/3, you swallowed pure bullshit Scotty. 2/3s of the homeless aren't families living in their cars and motor homes.

    killer rebuttal
  • Options
    greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,297
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment Combo Breaker
    edited October 2019
    It's almost like the reduction of more than 70% of the total mental health facilities over the last couple decades, and the increase of homeless psychopaths living on the streets might be related.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    1/3, you swallowed pure bullshit Scotty. 2/3s of the homeless aren't families living in their cars and motor homes.

    killer rebuttal
    What do I need to rebut? You stuck your head up your ass and claimed only 1/3 of the homeless were crazy and or drug addicts. I encourage you to say it as loudly and as often as possible. Just reveals you for the hack you are Scotty.
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    1/3, you swallowed pure bullshit Scotty. 2/3s of the homeless aren't families living in their cars and motor homes.

    killer rebuttal
    What do I need to rebut? You stuck your head up your ass and claimed only 1/3 of the homeless were crazy and or drug addicts. I encourage you to say it as loudly and as often as possible. Just reveals you for the hack you are Scotty.
    Read the article, some of their complaints about the HUD guidelines in the survey are valid but others are bunk. One, the LAT was only looking at unsheltered homeless and was excluding the sheltered homeless population. The LAT counted people who were at any point in their life told they had a mental health, ptsd, depression etc issue but claimed the issue was not long term or permanent. Therefore, if someone was told as an adolescent they had a bout of depression but now were not suffering from any mental health issue they were still counted under the LAT numbers. They also include people who otherwise answered the questions without any notes about substance abuse or mental health issue but looked like they could have a mental illness or substance abuse issue which could be helpful or could be complete bullshit.

    There's also this "But neither the UCLA study nor the Times analysis suggests that these disabilities and health conditions alone cause people to end up on the streets. Elected officials and researchers largely agree that California’s affordable housing crisis and poverty are the primary drivers of homelessness."
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019

    It's almost like the reduction of more than 70% of the total mental health facilities over the last couple decades, and the increase of homeless psychopaths living on the streets might be related.

    That and the decriminalization of crime are what's caused the explosion here in California.

    If you're a drug addict who wants to support your drug habit by committing crimes, California is the place to go. You will not be prosecuted for your drug use and if you keep your crimes limited to shoplifting and breaking into cars you won't even be arrested.
  • Options
    CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary
    SFGbob said:

    It's almost like the reduction of more than 70% of the total mental health facilities over the last couple decades, and the increase of homeless psychopaths living on the streets might be related.

    That and the decriminalization of crime are what's caused the explosion here in California.

    If you're a drug addict who wants to support your drug habit by committing crimes, California is the place to go. You will not be prosecuted for your drug use and if you keep your crimes limited to shoplifting and breaking into cars you won't even be arrested.
    Sounds like you are living a nightmare.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    It's almost like the reduction of more than 70% of the total mental health facilities over the last couple decades, and the increase of homeless psychopaths living on the streets might be related.

    That and the decriminalization of crime are what's caused the explosion here in California.

    If you're a drug addict who wants to support your drug habit by committing crimes, California is the place to go. You will not be prosecuted for your drug use and if you keep your crimes limited to shoplifting and breaking into cars you won't even be arrested.
    Sounds like you are living a nightmare.
    No, I'm just not living in denial and treating the state as if it were my boyfriend.
  • Options
    CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    It's almost like the reduction of more than 70% of the total mental health facilities over the last couple decades, and the increase of homeless psychopaths living on the streets might be related.

    That and the decriminalization of crime are what's caused the explosion here in California.

    If you're a drug addict who wants to support your drug habit by committing crimes, California is the place to go. You will not be prosecuted for your drug use and if you keep your crimes limited to shoplifting and breaking into cars you won't even be arrested.
    Sounds like you are living a nightmare.
    No, I'm just not living in denial and treating the state as if it were my boyfriend.
    Hang in there! Ts&Ps through your struggles.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,922
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    It's almost like the reduction of more than 70% of the total mental health facilities over the last couple decades, and the increase of homeless psychopaths living on the streets might be related.

    That and the decriminalization of crime are what's caused the explosion here in California.

    If you're a drug addict who wants to support your drug habit by committing crimes, California is the place to go. You will not be prosecuted for your drug use and if you keep your crimes limited to shoplifting and breaking into cars you won't even be arrested.
    Sounds like you are living a nightmare.
    No, I'm just not living in denial and treating the state as if it were my boyfriend.
    Hang in there! Ts&Ps through your struggles.
    Why does such a great state like California have so many homeless people El Monte? Does the state of California like typhus?
  • Options
    GwadGwad Member Posts: 2,855
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Is SFGBob one of those guys that drinks a ton of alcohol at night and a ton of coffee in the morning?
  • Options
    CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    It's almost like the reduction of more than 70% of the total mental health facilities over the last couple decades, and the increase of homeless psychopaths living on the streets might be related.

    That and the decriminalization of crime are what's caused the explosion here in California.

    If you're a drug addict who wants to support your drug habit by committing crimes, California is the place to go. You will not be prosecuted for your drug use and if you keep your crimes limited to shoplifting and breaking into cars you won't even be arrested.
    Sounds like you are living a nightmare.
    No, I'm just not living in denial and treating the state as if it were my boyfriend.
    Hang in there! Ts&Ps through your struggles.
    Why does such a great state like California have so many homeless people El Monte? Does the state of California like typhus?
    I don’t know nor do I care other than the fact it drives idiots like you to lose your shit.
Sign In or Register to comment.