Chart of Tax Rates since 50s

Gwad

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/FakeCandidDungbeetle-mobile.mp4

MikeDamone

😂

Have one that shows the effective rates?

Baseman

Looks like a dynamic visual chart of my average erections over time

Sledog

Now chart the deductions allowed. I'll wait.

GDS

Sledog said:

Now chart the deductions allowed. I'll wait.

You don’t realize that’s the effective rate? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised

Sledog

GDS said:

Sledog said:

Now chart the deductions allowed. I'll wait.

You don’t realize that’s the effective rate? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised

Simply says total rate, not effective. HTH

GDS

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

Now chart the deductions allowed. I'll wait.

You don’t realize that’s the effective rate? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised

Simply says total rate, not effective. HTH

Lol. Maybe you are this stupid.

Sledog

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

Now chart the deductions allowed. I'll wait.

You don’t realize that’s the effective rate? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised

Simply says total rate, not effective. HTH

Lol. Maybe you are this stupid.

I wasn't the only one with that question. Maybe you should read your own chart. How much more than the government took from your check did you pay? If you don't pay any more than required fuck off.

GDS

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

Now chart the deductions allowed. I'll wait.

You don’t realize that’s the effective rate? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised

Simply says total rate, not effective. HTH

Lol. Maybe you are this stupid.

I wasn't the only one with that question. Maybe you should read your own chart. How much more than the government took from your check did you pay? If you don't pay any more than required fuck off.

Your question made no sense since the chart is reflecting effective rates. Fuck you are stupid

MikeDamone

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

Now chart the deductions allowed. I'll wait.

You don’t realize that’s the effective rate? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised

Simply says total rate, not effective. HTH

Lol. Maybe you are this stupid.

I wasn't the only one with that question. Maybe you should read your own chart. How much more than the government took from your check did you pay? If you don't pay any more than required fuck off.

Your question made no sense since the chart is reflecting effective rates. Fuck you are stupid

Ummmm. No it’s not. It shows statutory rates.

https://taxfoundation.org/taxes-on-the-rich-1950s-not-high/

GDS

MikeDamone said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

Now chart the deductions allowed. I'll wait.

You don’t realize that’s the effective rate? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised

Simply says total rate, not effective. HTH

Lol. Maybe you are this stupid.

I wasn't the only one with that question. Maybe you should read your own chart. How much more than the government took from your check did you pay? If you don't pay any more than required fuck off.

Your question made no sense since the chart is reflecting effective rates. Fuck you are stupid

Ummmm. No it’s not. It shows statutory rates.

https://taxfoundation.org/taxes-on-the-rich-1950s-not-high/

No it doesn’t...look at it again.

MikeDamone

GDS said:

MikeDamone said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

Now chart the deductions allowed. I'll wait.

You don’t realize that’s the effective rate? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised

Simply says total rate, not effective. HTH

Lol. Maybe you are this stupid.

I wasn't the only one with that question. Maybe you should read your own chart. How much more than the government took from your check did you pay? If you don't pay any more than required fuck off.

Your question made no sense since the chart is reflecting effective rates. Fuck you are stupid

Ummmm. No it’s not. It shows statutory rates.

https://taxfoundation.org/taxes-on-the-rich-1950s-not-high/

No it doesn’t...look at it again.

So the top 400 paid over 70% of their income in taxes? You’re a god damn idiot. Unless fake candid dung bettle is satire

GDS

MikeDamone said:

GDS said:

MikeDamone said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

Now chart the deductions allowed. I'll wait.

You don’t realize that’s the effective rate? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised

Simply says total rate, not effective. HTH

Lol. Maybe you are this stupid.

I wasn't the only one with that question. Maybe you should read your own chart. How much more than the government took from your check did you pay? If you don't pay any more than required fuck off.

Your question made no sense since the chart is reflecting effective rates. Fuck you are stupid

Ummmm. No it’s not. It shows statutory rates.

https://taxfoundation.org/taxes-on-the-rich-1950s-not-high/

No it doesn’t...look at it again.

So the top 400 paid over 70% of their income in taxes? You’re a god damn idiot. Unless fake candid dung bettle is satire

That’s what the chart is alleging. That the total effective tax rate including state, local and federal taxes on the richest 400 Americans was 70% in 1950. How could it be statutory when it’s including state, local and federal? You’re a god damn idiot.

GDS

You think the current statutory rate on the 99.99th percentile income earners in America is 10% higher than the statutory rate charged on the top 400? You’re a god damn idiot.

MikeDamone

GDS said:

MikeDamone said:

GDS said:

MikeDamone said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

Now chart the deductions allowed. I'll wait.

You don’t realize that’s the effective rate? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised

Simply says total rate, not effective. HTH

Lol. Maybe you are this stupid.

I wasn't the only one with that question. Maybe you should read your own chart. How much more than the government took from your check did you pay? If you don't pay any more than required fuck off.

Your question made no sense since the chart is reflecting effective rates. Fuck you are stupid

Ummmm. No it’s not. It shows statutory rates.

https://taxfoundation.org/taxes-on-the-rich-1950s-not-high/

No it doesn’t...look at it again.

So the top 400 paid over 70% of their income in taxes? You’re a god damn idiot. Unless fake candid dung bettle is satire

That’s what the chart is alleging. That the total effective tax rate including state, local and federal taxes on the richest 400 Americans was 70% in 1950. How could it be statutory when it’s including state, local and federal? You’re a god damn idiot.

Ummmm. Because the state, local and federal governments have statutes that set the tax rates... Are you this dumb? You are saying that someone who made $10million paid $7 million in taxes. That didn’t happen. Ever. Not even close. I’m thinking you don’t know what an effective tax rate is.

MikeDamone

GDS said:

You think the current statutory rate on the 99.99th percentile income earners in America is 10% higher than the statutory rate charged on the top 400? You’re a god damn idiot.

No, I don’t think that. Because I know what a statutory rate is. Unlike you.

The highest statutory rate for federal tax current is 37% over $500k. The effective rate is lower because only income over $500k is subject to that and many deductions and credits are available to lower the effective rate. No one is paying 37% of their income in federal taxes. You’re a dumb fuck. You don’t know what an effective tax rate is. Or a statutory rate. That’s pretty funny. Are you a teenager?

GDS

MikeDamone said:

GDS said:

MikeDamone said:

GDS said:

MikeDamone said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

GDS said:

Sledog said:

Now chart the deductions allowed. I'll wait.

You don’t realize that’s the effective rate? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised

Simply says total rate, not effective. HTH

Lol. Maybe you are this stupid.

I wasn't the only one with that question. Maybe you should read your own chart. How much more than the government took from your check did you pay? If you don't pay any more than required fuck off.

Your question made no sense since the chart is reflecting effective rates. Fuck you are stupid

Ummmm. No it’s not. It shows statutory rates.

https://taxfoundation.org/taxes-on-the-rich-1950s-not-high/

No it doesn’t...look at it again.

So the top 400 paid over 70% of their income in taxes? You’re a god damn idiot. Unless fake candid dung bettle is satire

That’s what the chart is alleging. That the total effective tax rate including state, local and federal taxes on the richest 400 Americans was 70% in 1950. How could it be statutory when it’s including state, local and federal? You’re a god damn idiot.

Ummmm. Because the state, local ams federal governments have statutes that set the tax rates... Are you this dumb? You are saying that someone who made $10million paid $7 million in taxes. That didn’t happen. Ever. Not even close. I’m thinking you don’t know what an effective tax rate is.

Yes they did according to that data. Again you are talking about the top 400 earners. In 1950 only about 10,000 households fell into the highest tax bracket of 91%. You are seriously so fucking stupid that you think the statutory rate on the 99.99% today is 10% higher then on the top 400? Lol

MikeDamone

@gds. To be clear, if someone in 1950 was in the top 400 and made $10million, they paid $7million in taxes? That’s your assertion? Because that’s what you’re saying.

GDS

MikeDamone said:

@gds. To be clear, if some in 1950 was in the top 400 and made $10million, they paid $7million in taxes. That’s your assertion? Because that’s what you’re saying.

The chart comes from this op-ed in case you want to read more but you already commented the thread about the op-ed. Guess you didn’t read it before you commented...

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/10/06/opinion/income-tax-rate-wealthy.html

MikeDamone

GDS said:

MikeDamone said:

@gds. To be clear, if some in 1950 was in the top 400 and made $10million, they paid $7million in taxes. That’s your assertion? Because that’s what you’re saying.

The chart comes from this op-ed in case you want to read more but you already commented the thread about the op-ed. Guess you didn’t read it before you commented...

Answer the question @gds. So, yes or no. $10 million in income paid $7million in taxes in 1950. Yes or no.

GDS

MikeDamone said:

@gds. To be clear, if someone in 1950 was in the top 400 and made $10million, they paid $7million in taxes? That’s your assertion? Because that’s what you’re saying.

It’s obviously not the statutory rate as we know the statutory top rate in 1950 was 91%