One is the loneliest number that you’ll ever do

TheKobeStopper

Second whistle blower comes forward.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/2nd-whistleblower-forward-speaking-ig-attorney/story?id=66092396

PurpleThrobber

Zaid is the new Avennatti???

CirrhosisDawg

PurpleThrobber said:

Zaid is the new Avennatti???

Avenatti has his claims deemed credible by the IC inspector general?

Sledog

Dems going with the Kavenaugh attack. Worked out well last time!

ApostleofGrief

This has legs

MikeDamone

Sounds like they really got ‘em this time.

CirrhosisDawg

MikeDamone said:

Sounds like they really got ‘em this time.

JFC

MikeDamone

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

Sounds like they really got ‘em this time.

JFC

You disagree?

CirrhosisDawg

MikeDamone said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

Sounds like they really got ‘em this time.

JFC

You disagree?

To “sounds like they really got ‘em this time?”

I don’t understand or speak retard.

MikeDamone

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

Sounds like they really got ‘em this time.

JFC

You disagree?

To “sounds like they really got ‘em this time?”

I don’t understand or speak retard.

Bullshit. You post fluent retard here daily.

So you don’t think they really have trump by balls now or what? I think that’s TKS’s point. Death nail. You disagree?

PurpleThrobber

CirrhosisDawg said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Zaid is the new Avennatti???

Avenatti has his claims deemed credible by the IC inspector general?

It said he followed proper protocol and spoke with the IG instead of running straight to Schiff. No mention of validity or credence.

If that’s ‘credible’, that’s damn near a conviction in typhus land, I’m sure.

CirrhosisDawg

PurpleThrobber said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Zaid is the new Avennatti???

Avenatti has his claims deemed credible by the IC inspector general?

It said he followed proper protocol and spoke with the IG instead of running straight to Schiff. No mention of validity or credence.

If that’s ‘credible’, that’s damn near a conviction in typhus land, I’m sure.

You want to double check that? I’ll give you a do-over because I am a nice person.

CirrhosisDawg

MikeDamone said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

Sounds like they really got ‘em this time.

JFC

You disagree?

To “sounds like they really got ‘em this time?”

I don’t understand or speak retard.

Bullshit. You post fluent retard here daily.

So you don’t think they really have trump by balls now or what? I think that’s TKS’s point. Death nail. You disagree?

“They really have trump by the balls.”
“Death nail.”

What does that mean? Use your words. Remember, you purport to represent the rationalists here.

PurpleThrobber

CirrhosisDawg said:

PurpleThrobber said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Zaid is the new Avennatti???

Avenatti has his claims deemed credible by the IC inspector general?

It said he followed proper protocol and spoke with the IG instead of running straight to Schiff. No mention of validity or credence.

If that’s ‘credible’, that’s damn near a conviction in typhus land, I’m sure.

You want to double check that? I’ll give you a do-over because I am a nice person.

No. You’re not.

PurpleThrobber

PurpleThrobber said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

PurpleThrobber said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Zaid is the new Avennatti???

Avenatti has his claims deemed credible by the IC inspector general?

It said he followed proper protocol and spoke with the IG instead of running straight to Schiff. No mention of validity or credence.

If that’s ‘credible’, that’s damn near a conviction in typhus land, I’m sure.

You want to double check that? I’ll give you a do-over because I am a nice person.

No. You’re not.

By the way, because I am a nice person, I won’t call you a dumbass just yet.

Please to be pointing to a direct quote or confirmation from the IG on credibility

Everything is attributed to Zaid. Just like Avennati’s playbook.

Credible. Pffft

A complaint was lodged. Big deal. They followed protocol on this one. Still awfully warm for October.


Wake up, sheeple.

CirrhosisDawg

WBer complaints do not see the light of day unless the IC IG deems it credible. Free yourself. Komo4.

MikeDamone

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

Sounds like they really got ‘em this time.

JFC

You disagree?

To “sounds like they really got ‘em this time?”

I don’t understand or speak retard.

Bullshit. You post fluent retard here daily.

So you don’t think they really have trump by balls now or what? I think that’s TKS’s point. Death nail. You disagree?

“They really have trump by the balls.”
“Death nail.”

What does that mean? Use your words. Remember, you purport to represent the rationalists here.

I’ll type slower for you. This is the insurmountable evidence that will get trump out of office and maybe prison. Agree?

CirrhosisDawg

MikeDamone said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

Sounds like they really got ‘em this time.

JFC

You disagree?

To “sounds like they really got ‘em this time?”

I don’t understand or speak retard.

Bullshit. You post fluent retard here daily.

So you don’t think they really have trump by balls now or what? I think that’s TKS’s point. Death nail. You disagree?

“They really have trump by the balls.”
“Death nail.”

What does that mean? Use your words. Remember, you purport to represent the rationalists here.

I’ll type slower for you. This is the insurmountable evidence that will get trump out of office and maybe prison. Agree?

Who’s claiming that other than your typical dim witted trump apologists? Slow down turbo. First impeachment inquiry and then impeachment vote. Lipo from there. This is a Constitutional process.

MikeDamone

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

Sounds like they really got ‘em this time.

JFC

You disagree?

To “sounds like they really got ‘em this time?”

I don’t understand or speak retard.

Bullshit. You post fluent retard here daily.

So you don’t think they really have trump by balls now or what? I think that’s TKS’s point. Death nail. You disagree?

“They really have trump by the balls.”
“Death nail.”

What does that mean? Use your words. Remember, you purport to represent the rationalists here.

I’ll type slower for you. This is the insurmountable evidence that will get trump out of office and maybe prison. Agree?

Who’s claiming that other than your typical dim witted trump apologists? Slow down turbo. First impeachment inquiry and then impeachment vote. Lipo from there. This is a Constitutional process.

I don’t know. TheKobe seems to think it’s important. Does it have legs? Is the nation outraged?

PurpleThrobber

CirrhosisDawg said:

WBer complaints do not see the light of day unless the IC IG deems it credible. Free yourself. Komo4.

That’s not at all how the process works.

Wake up. And provide the link that the IG says the complaint is ‘credible’.

CirrhosisDawg

PurpleThrobber said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

WBer complaints do not see the light of day unless the IC IG deems it credible. Free yourself. Komo4.

That’s not at all how the process works.

Wake up. And provide the link that the IG says the complaint is ‘credible’.

I just googled “IC IG whistleblower complaint credible” and dozens of articles appeared illustrating that under a federal law a WBer complaint has to be deemed “credible” before it’s allowed for release to congress. Just as what happened last week. The IC IG deemed the WBer credible and the complaint was this sent to Congress, as the law requires and stipulates. Is your google broken? You’re fortunate I’m a nice person.