Running out of fucking whistles

ApostleofGrief · October 2019

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/04/us/politics/second-trump-whistleblower.html

Closer to the quid pro quo.

Rationalizing?

ApostleofGrief · October 2019

This is more work of the evil Mr Schiff?

SFGbob · October 2019

Yeah, I’d move on from the first pile of shit you were peddling too.

ApostleofGrief · October 2019

SFGbob said:
Yeah, I’d move on from the first pile of shit you were peddling too.

Aren't you going to defame Schiff more? Isn't this all due to socialists and liars? They are the cause of Mr Trump demanding investigation of sham scandals correct?

Pitchfork51 · October 2019

How is this interesting or enjoyable to you guys lol

Gwad · October 2019

Fake News! You hate America!

SFGbob · October 2019

ApostleofGrief said:

SFGbob said:
Yeah, I’d move on from the first pile of shit you were peddling too.
Aren't you going to defame Schiff more? Isn't this all due to socialists and liars? They are the cause of Mr Trump demanding investigation of sham scandals correct?

Yeah I’ve defamed Schiff, work the balls cock sucker, work the balls

Alexis · October 2019

Kinda like those extra Kavanaugh victims. Adding extra ones always works.

Bigger than Watergate I'm told. #PresidentPelosi.

ApostleofGrief · October 2019

Alexis said:
Kinda like those extra Kavanaugh victims. Adding extra ones always works.

Bigger than Watergate I'm told. #PresidentPelosi.

They had no proof is the difference

ApostleofGrief · October 2019

With proof and a whistleblower protection Trump cannot prevent testimony. Usually he simply ignores requests for investigation and interview.

GrundleStiltzkin · October 2019

ApostleofGrief said:
With proof and a whistleblower protection Trump cannot prevent testimony. Usually he simply ignores requests for investigation and interview.

Unless YOU have proof in HAND...it’s speculation for YOU. ‘Those who know’....meaning YOU are not a ‘THOSE’. I didn’t create the English language but ‘speculation’ is pretty cut and dry. Unless you are an eye witness, YOU are speculating. Word of mouth is not proof.

ApostleofGrief · October 2019

GrundleStiltzkin said:

ApostleofGrief said:
With proof and a whistleblower protection Trump cannot prevent testimony. Usually he simply ignores requests for investigation and interview.
Unless YOU have proof in HAND...it’s speculation for YOU. ‘Those who know’....meaning YOU are not a ‘THOSE’. I didn’t create the English language but ‘speculation’ is pretty cut and dry. Unless you are an eye witness, YOU are speculating. Word of mouth is not proof.

that's a false dichotomy. It varies from totally unverifiable ("speculative") to smoking gun. It's a context based continuum.