USC outgained us
Without our defense stepping up we lose 14-13. As ever our young defense carries the day.
Comments
-
Winners win. Losers lose.
-
Pac went from a good offensive conference with trash D to a decent D conference with trash O basicallyMad_Son said:USC gained more yards offensively. We had 15 points off of turnovers.
Without our defense stepping up we lose 14-13. As ever our young defense carries the day. -
Ahmed’s TD Run is the greatest 14 pt swing in a long time.
-
Lake wins and drags the offense kicking and screaming.YellowSnow said:Winners win. Losers lose.
-
Pretty sure uw had more yardsMad_Son said:USC gained more yards offensively. We had 15 points off of turnovers.
Without our defense stepping up we lose 14-13. As ever our young defense carries the day. -
Stats, they for loosers
-
Offense stalled when we got too cuteMad_Son said:
Lake wins and drags the offense kicking and screaming.YellowSnow said:Winners win. Losers lose.
-
MikeDamone said:
Pretty sure uw had more yardsMad_Son said:USC gained more yards offensively. We had 15 points off of turnovers.
Without our defense stepping up we lose 14-13. As ever our young defense carries the day.
-
Yards are cute. Points are better.
-
I swore I looked at stat board before uw got the ball the last time and SC had 4 more yards.Mad_Son said:MikeDamone said:
Pretty sure uw had more yardsMad_Son said:USC gained more yards offensively. We had 15 points off of turnovers.
Without our defense stepping up we lose 14-13. As ever our young defense carries the day. -
Context is huge. The Seahawks outgained the Saints by quite a bit Sunday but the Saints controlled the entire game.
Same thing here.
Yards only tell part of the story. -
I’m just glad we have an elite QB
-
3 phases
-
-
USC has superior talent, no? So that's the 3rd Petersen win over a team with higher talent?
-
Yup. We're good at 1, passable at 1, and shit at 1.WilburHooksHands said:3 phases
-
The fact that we had a comfortable lead most of the game concealed our offensive ineptitude. We felt better because we were in control. That is the exact problem.dnc said:Context is huge. The Seahawks outgained the Saints by quite a bit Sunday but the Saints controlled the entire game.
Same thing here.
Yards only tell part of the story. -
So you like yards over points?Mad_Son said: -
I like having a complete team. I am fucking sick and tired of having a shit offense and being wholly dependent on the defense year after year.CuntWaffle said:
So you like yards over points?Mad_Son said: -
Forget it. You can't make Mad_son understand football or logic. Others have tried.CuntWaffle said:
So you like yards over points?Mad_Son said:
He is drawing an invalid conclusion from the data and is not grasping what others are telling him (like you and dnc).
Forget it. Sometimes the ignorant don't want to learn.
-
Apparently EwaDawg is Bush Hamdan.
-
So do I! And I like our offense overall way more than I did last year (because of Eason obviously). It’s still flawed and shit still frustrates me... but I like winning, I don’t care how ugly it is. We dominated that game, only reason it was close was because our coach has his fucktard lapses where he replays the 2006 Oklahoma game in the back of his head. Still a lot to improve on but I’m going to enjoy a win, I don’t care if USC outyarded is by 2, we? Made more plays.Mad_Son said:
I like having a complete team. I am fucking sick and tired of having a shit offense and being wholly dependent on the defense year after year.CuntWaffle said:
So you like yards over points?Mad_Son said: -
The data you are providing doesn't back up the point you are trying (and failing) to make.Mad_Son said:Apparently EwaDawg is Bush Hamdan.
Hamden sucks but if you want to convince somebody of something bring some logic. Please.
-
We got points despite our offense. USC were able to move the ball just as well as us but in the end we won because our defense made plays. You're the one who doesn't get it.EwaDawg said:
Forget it. You can't make Mad_son understand football or logic. Others have tried.CuntWaffle said:
So you like yards over points?Mad_Son said:
He is drawing an invalid conclusion from the data and is not grasping what others are telling him (like you and dnc).
Forget it. Sometimes the ignorant don't want to learn. -
I certainly wasn't impressed with our offense today, and Eason was just not sharp, but it's not the tragedy you're making it out to be. I'm much more concerned about our ILBs. I don't think we've had such a weak position group since before football was invented in 2016. USC scores no points if we have even adequate linebackers.
-
Our defense made plays. This is a feel good win but yardage is just one measure that helps highlight that we beat USC with different phases of the game than offense, since it didn't feel close. We have an incredible talent in Eason who is neutered by Pete and Hamdan. We have had championship caliber defenses for years now. We are continually held back by the offense.CuntWaffle said:
So do I! And I like our offense overall way more than I did last year (because of Eason obviously). It’s still flawed and shit still frustrates me... but I like winning, I don’t care how ugly it is. We dominated that game, only reason it was close was because our coach has his fucktard lapses where he replays the 2006 Oklahoma game in the back of his head. Still a lot to improve on but I’m going to enjoy a win, I don’t care if USC outyarded is by 2, we? Made more plays.Mad_Son said:
I like having a complete team. I am fucking sick and tired of having a shit offense and being wholly dependent on the defense year after year.CuntWaffle said:
So you like yards over points?Mad_Son said: -
I agree our LBs are a huge weakness, but we mitigate that with our defense. Our defense carries the team despite our LBs.GreenRiverGatorz said:I certainly wasn't impressed with our offense today, and Eason was just not sharp, but it's not the tragedy you're making it out to be. I'm much more concerned about our ILBs. I don't think we've had such a weak position group since before football was invented in 2016. USC scores no points if we have even adequate linebackers.
-
Mad_Son said:
USC gained more yards offensively. We had 15 points off of turnovers.
Without our defense stepping up we lose 14-13. As ever our young defense carries the day.
And, USC actually gained fewer yards per offense per play. And some of our plays were kneel downs (for what may have been negative yards).
Seriously, ARE YOU DRUNK?
You can't erase our points off of turnovers and say that would have been the final score. That is *Redacted Poster* FUCKING STUPID.
Quit while you are losing and only look PARTIALLY FUCKING MORONIC.
-
And last week our offense carried the team. That's a huge improvement over these last two years when the offense couldn't be trusted with shit.Mad_Son said:
I agree our LBs are a huge weakness, but we mitigate that with our defense. Our defense carries the team despite our LBs.GreenRiverGatorz said:I certainly wasn't impressed with our offense today, and Eason was just not sharp, but it's not the tragedy you're making it out to be. I'm much more concerned about our ILBs. I don't think we've had such a weak position group since before football was invented in 2016. USC scores no points if we have even adequate linebackers.
-
Dude, you're on the wrong side of the Dunning-Kruger curve here. I don't know why you've chosen this hill to die on but you're wrong. You entirely don't get the point despite me spelling it out for you in increasing detail with successive posts.EwaDawg said:Mad_Son said:USC gained more yards offensively. We had 15 points off of turnovers.
Without our defense stepping up we lose 14-13. As ever our young defense carries the day.
And, USC actually gained fewer yards per offense per play. And some of our plays were kneel downs (for what may have been negative yards).
Seriously, ARE YOU DRUNK?
You can't erase our points off of turnovers and say that would have been the final score. That is *Redacted Poster* FUCKING STUPID.
Quit while you are losing and only look PARTIALLY FUCKING MORONIC.
