Putting classified information on a classified server is now a crime

SFGbob

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

Maybe they were trying to "lock it down" because there was a history of people leaking Trump's conversations. The memo itself was classified. So what's the problem with securing it in a classified system? And now we've all seen the memo. Schiff has obviously known the content of the conversation for over a month, so where is the cover up?

LOL you are such a sad pathetic man. Keep on telling yourself Trump is innocent.

Translation: I'm too fucking stupid to respond with anything intelligent. So I, the dumbfuck who loves to swallow like a bitch (Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress) will call you a sad and pathetic, because seriously, I've got nothing and my talking points don't cover what you said.

CirrhosisDawg

RaceBannon said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

RaceBannon said:

Gwad said:

@SFGbob would you eat hillary's box if it ment getting her convicted of a crime?

Thanks for the contribution. I now see why Trump must be impeached

GayBob pedophilia rants are more to your liking apparently.

They are?

Wow Trump really needs to be impeached now!

Around thanksgiving, to be more precise.

RaceBannon

CirrhosisDawg said:

RaceBannon said:

CirrhosisDawg said:

RaceBannon said:

Gwad said:

@SFGbob would you eat hillary's box if it ment getting her convicted of a crime?

Thanks for the contribution. I now see why Trump must be impeached

GayBob pedophilia rants are more to your liking apparently.

They are?

Wow Trump really needs to be impeached now!

Around thanksgiving, to be more precise.

In other news Nadler is getting primaried by an AOC candidate

2001400ex

Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

SFGbob

2001400ex said:

Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

Not being a dumbfuck like you Hondo, I'm able to think for myself.

Now stop being a fucking Kunt and give me the name of that "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath.

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

Not being a dumbfuck like you Hondo, I'm able to think for myself.

Now stop being a fucking Kunt and give me the name of that "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath.

Be honest Bob. Where did you get the headline from?

SFGbob

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

Not being a dumbfuck like you Hondo, I'm able to think for myself.

Now stop being a fucking Kunt and give me the name of that "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath.

Be honest Bob. Where did you get the headline from?

Go fuck yourself. Back up your fucking mouth for once in your pathetic life and tell us the name of the "prosecutor" who you claim put Clinton under oath before they had possession of the blue dress. You said it you pathetic fucking moron, back it up.

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

Not being a dumbfuck like you Hondo, I'm able to think for myself.

Now stop being a fucking Kunt and give me the name of that "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath.

Be honest Bob. Where did you get the headline from?

Go fuck yourself. Back up your fucking mouth for once in your pathetic life and tell us the name of the "prosecutor" who you claim put Clinton under oath before they had possession of the blue dress. You said it you pathetic fucking moron, back it up.

Bob playing word semantics. As always. When he realizes he's fucking dumb. And has no clue what the topic is even about.

Come on Bob, I share my source of information. Why are you always afraid to share your source??? I'm genuinely curious where you got that thought process from.

SFGbob

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

Not being a dumbfuck like you Hondo, I'm able to think for myself.

Now stop being a fucking Kunt and give me the name of that "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath.

Be honest Bob. Where did you get the headline from?

Go fuck yourself. Back up your fucking mouth for once in your pathetic life and tell us the name of the "prosecutor" who you claim put Clinton under oath before they had possession of the blue dress. You said it you pathetic fucking moron, back it up.

Bob playing word semantics. As always. When he realizes he's fucking dumb. And has no clue what the topic is even about.

Come on Bob, I share my source of information. Why are you always afraid to share your source??? I'm genuinely curious where you got that thought process from.

I quoted what you said you lying sack of shit. There was no "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath before they had possession of the blue dress. You fucking lied Kunt and instead of having the integrity to admit that you were fucking wrong, you called me a liar and made up some bullshit story about how you weren't talking about the Paula Jones case.

How big a fucking Kunt do you have to be in order to be unable to admit you made a mistake on an anonymous message board?

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

Just read the headline. Tell me Bob, what AM radio talk show did you get that insight from?

Not being a dumbfuck like you Hondo, I'm able to think for myself.

Now stop being a fucking Kunt and give me the name of that "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath.

Be honest Bob. Where did you get the headline from?

Go fuck yourself. Back up your fucking mouth for once in your pathetic life and tell us the name of the "prosecutor" who you claim put Clinton under oath before they had possession of the blue dress. You said it you pathetic fucking moron, back it up.

Bob playing word semantics. As always. When he realizes he's fucking dumb. And has no clue what the topic is even about.

Come on Bob, I share my source of information. Why are you always afraid to share your source??? I'm genuinely curious where you got that thought process from.

I quoted what you said you lying sack of shit. There was no "prosecutor" who put Clinton under oath before they had possession of the blue dress. You fucking lied Kunt and instead of having the integrity to admit that you were fucking wrong, you called me a liar and made up some bullshit story about how you weren't talking about the Paula Jones case.

How big a fucking Kunt do you have to be in order to be unable to admit you made a mistake on an anonymous message board?

Bob I honestly don't even remember the specifics of that comment and I'm not going to dig it up, you are welcome to however and I can respond it to. That being said. The point of the comment was that Clinton was put under oath prior to having evidence. Which is absolutely correct. And was in response to you guys all saying Trump couldn't be investigated based on second hand information.

Anyways. What is the source of your headline? Why are you embarrassed to say so Bob?