The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
By definition a “whistleblower” has first-hand knowledge of an event of which this guy did not, and Shitt has had it since August.
But OK...nominate Dementia Biden or Fauxahontas and see how that works out for you.
He did have first-hand knowledge. He was working with colleagues who told him what happened and that was corroborated with the phone reconstruction along with all relevant details!
There's a well established legal test for this:
Unless YOU have proof in HAND...it’s speculation for YOU. ‘Those who know’....meaning YOU are not a ‘THOSE’. I didn’t create the English language but ‘speculation’ is pretty cut and dry. Unless you are an eye witness, YOU are speculating. Word of mouth is not proof.
I don't feel like they had proof that Clinton had sexual relations with Monica when he was put under oath. So I dig your words in all caps, but you entire point is meaningless.
This needs to be framed
Starr already had Monica's blue dress in his possession before he put Clinton in front of the Grand Jury. Hondo, because he is a fucking moron with a big mouth is confusing the depo Bill gave in the Paula Jones case which was a civil matter that didn't have anything to do with the government with the Starr investigation.
I said "put under oath". What do you think that sworn deposition in January 1998 was? The blue dress wasn't handed over until the summer of 1998. Are you seriously that fucking stupid?
And I said:
Pretty sure they already had the blue dress before Clinton was put under oath by Starr.
The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
By definition a “whistleblower” has first-hand knowledge of an event of which this guy did not, and Shitt has had it since August.
But OK...nominate Dementia Biden or Fauxahontas and see how that works out for you.
He did have first-hand knowledge. He was working with colleagues who told him what happened and that was corroborated with the phone reconstruction along with all relevant details!
There's a well established legal test for this:
Unless YOU have proof in HAND...it’s speculation for YOU. ‘Those who know’....meaning YOU are not a ‘THOSE’. I didn’t create the English language but ‘speculation’ is pretty cut and dry. Unless you are an eye witness, YOU are speculating. Word of mouth is not proof.
I don't feel like they had proof that Clinton had sexual relations with Monica when he was put under oath. So I dig your words in all caps, but you entire point is meaningless.
This needs to be framed
So... I'd read it again man..... There was no proof before the sworn deposition in January of 1998. So.... He was put under oath before the prosecutors had the dress or anything. All they had at that point was secretly recorded words of Monica. Of which I haven't found what they containing.
There were no "prosecutors" you fucking moron it was a civil suit. You're such dumb fuck Hondo.
Of which I haven't found what they containing.
You're a barely coherent retard with a really big mouth.
If you're talking about "prosecutors" you're talking about the Starr investigation and Starr already had the blue dress before he ever put Clinton under oath. But you're stupid and you're a liar so now you're going to try and claim that you were talking about the Paula Jones suit all long despite the fact that there were no "prosecutors" in the Paula Jones case.
And I clearly said put under oath by Starr. So not only wasn't I wrong, you had your fucking head up your ass all along Hondo.
The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
By definition a “whistleblower” has first-hand knowledge of an event of which this guy did not, and Shitt has had it since August.
But OK...nominate Dementia Biden or Fauxahontas and see how that works out for you.
He did have first-hand knowledge. He was working with colleagues who told him what happened and that was corroborated with the phone reconstruction along with all relevant details!
There's a well established legal test for this:
Unless YOU have proof in HAND...it’s speculation for YOU. ‘Those who know’....meaning YOU are not a ‘THOSE’. I didn’t create the English language but ‘speculation’ is pretty cut and dry. Unless you are an eye witness, YOU are speculating. Word of mouth is not proof.
I don't feel like they had proof that Clinton had sexual relations with Monica when he was put under oath. So I dig your words in all caps, but you entire point is meaningless.
This needs to be framed
Starr already had Monica's blue dress in his possession before he put Clinton in front of the Grand Jury. Hondo, because he is a fucking moron with a big mouth is confusing the depo Bill gave in the Paula Jones case which was a civil matter that didn't have anything to do with the government with the Starr investigation.
I said "put under oath". What do you think that sworn deposition in January 1998 was? The blue dress wasn't handed over until the summer of 1998. Are you seriously that fucking stupid?
And I said:
Pretty sure they already had the blue dress before Clinton was put under oath by Starr.
Mr. Shitty reading comprehension.
Dude STFU. Idiot.
What's the fuck's wrong Mr. Reading Comprehension? And why the fuck are you talking about "prosecutors" in the Paula Jones case?
The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
Wake up to find Hondo arguing with a pretty black woman from Alabama. Gonna be a great day.
While I generally find you hilarious.... You are better than that. You know I was right and understand the intent of my comment, even if you don't like it.
The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
Wake up to find Hondo arguing with a pretty black woman from Alabama. Gonna be a great day.
While I generally find you hilarious.... You are better than that. You know I was right and understand the intent of my comment, even if you don't like it.
Shocking, Hondo is dodging the questions like a Kunt. Hondo what was the name of the "prosecutor" when Clinton was deposed in January 2018? Dance dumbfuck, dance!!!
Wake up to find Hondo arguing with a pretty black woman from Alabama. Gonna be a great day.
While I generally find you hilarious.... You are better than that. You know I was right and understand the intent of my comment, even if you don't like it.
Shocking, Hondo is dodging the questions like a Kunt. Hondo what was the name of the "prosecutor" when Clinton was deposed in January 2018? Dance dumbfuck, dance!!!
The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
Nobody thought you could impeach based on a whistleblower complaint, Officer Fife. If you were a real cop you might consider exploring who the first hand witnesses are. You might even go so far as to speak to them.
Wake up to find Hondo arguing with a pretty black woman from Alabama. Gonna be a great day.
While I generally find you hilarious.... You are better than that. You know I was right and understand the intent of my comment, even if you don't like it.
Shocking, Hondo is dodging the questions like a Kunt. Hondo what was the name of the "prosecutor" when Clinton was deposed in January 2018? Dance dumbfuck, dance!!!
Bob again misses context about anything. Idiot.
Hondo once again talks out his ass and hides behind his "context" Kunt act when he is exposed as a dumbfuck. Can you give me the name of that "prosecutor" Hondo? I'd like to read about them. What's their name?
The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
Nobody thought you could impeach based on a whistleblower complaint, Officer Fife. If you were a real cop you might consider exploring who the first hand witnesses are. You might even go so far as to speak to them.
OK who's the first hand witness and why is hearsay excluded on whistleblower complaints? Maybe you should give some legal advice to the government. This whole mes is contrived that complaint was most likely written by a law firm who is most likely employed by the DNC.
About the hearsay argument... first of all I think it is bogus since we can corroborate the phone call with the complaint. But secondly, I'm doubt Congress is obliged to use any legal definitions of "hearsay." They can, but remember impeachment is for whatever the House views as a "high crime." It doesn't have to be a crime, and doesn't have to adhere to legal investigations.
The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
Nobody thought you could impeach based on a whistleblower complaint, Officer Fife. If you were a real cop you might consider exploring who the first hand witnesses are. You might even go so far as to speak to them.
OK who's the first hand witness and why is hearsay excluded on whistleblower complaints? Maybe you should give some legal advice to the government. This whole mes is contrived that complaint was most likely written by a law firm who is most likely employed by the DNC.
You still voting for "I did it" Joe?
Trump university logic and grammar. Oh wait, GayBob went to Oregon. I’m sure that’s a better school than trump U, isn’t it?
The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
Nobody thought you could impeach based on a whistleblower complaint, Officer Fife. If you were a real cop you might consider exploring who the first hand witnesses are. You might even go so far as to speak to them.
The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
Nobody thought you could impeach based on a whistleblower complaint, Officer Fife. If you were a real cop you might consider exploring who the first hand witnesses are. You might even go so far as to speak to them.
Breaking news?
First there will be an inquiry and hearings. Then a vote. Try to keep up.
The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
Nobody thought you could impeach based on a whistleblower complaint, Officer Fife. If you were a real cop you might consider exploring who the first hand witnesses are. You might even go so far as to speak to them.
Breaking news?
First there will be an inquiry and hearings. Then a vote. Try to keep up.
So you can impeach based on a whistleblower complaint
The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
Nobody thought you could impeach based on a whistleblower complaint, Officer Fife. If you were a real cop you might consider exploring who the first hand witnesses are. You might even go so far as to speak to them.
Again, what absolute nonsense are you talking about? Straw-man strikes again...
Nobody said you can't impeach off of a whisteblower complaint...people have said this specific whistleblower's complaint is a joke. It is based off of 2nd and 3rd hand information (and Buzzfeed news of all things...effin eh) that was proven false with the release of the transcript. It was handled properly by the DNI who said it didn't meet the "Urgent" criteria because it was hearsay and therefore didn't forward it to Congress as the law says he should not. Shitt didn't like that because he already had a copy and is ready to start the circus so he went nuts.
If you really are a lawyer god bless the public defendants that have to be represented by you...
Comments
Of which I haven't found what they containing.
You're a barely coherent retard with a really big mouth.
And I clearly said put under oath by Starr. So not only wasn't I wrong, you had your fucking head up your ass all along Hondo.
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
Nothing to see here move along!
You still voting for "I did it" Joe?
So ultimately the "hearsay" argument is null
Then a vote.
Try to keep up.
Thanks for clearing that up
@HHusky is kind of slow
Nobody said you can't impeach off of a whisteblower complaint...people have said this specific whistleblower's complaint is a joke. It is based off of 2nd and 3rd hand information (and Buzzfeed news of all things...effin eh) that was proven false with the release of the transcript. It was handled properly by the DNI who said it didn't meet the "Urgent" criteria because it was hearsay and therefore didn't forward it to Congress as the law says he should not. Shitt didn't like that because he already had a copy and is ready to start the circus so he went nuts.
If you really are a lawyer god bless the public defendants that have to be represented by you...