Current Winsipedia - USC vs Washington

oregonblitzkrieg

EwaDawg said:

YellowSnow said:

creepycoug said:

YellowSnow said:

RaceBannon said:

YellowSnow said:

RaceBannon said:

Stanford is 32-61 - USC 65%

UCLA is 32-49 - USC 60%

UW is 29-51 - USC 63%

No other coast team is close to these three in beating USC

Oregon 19 wins most of them since football was invented

Beavs with 9

WSU with 10

ASU 13 but USC with a 63% due to less games played

Arizona 8

Oh and Cal with 26 wins but SC with 72% wins

And we were .500 against USC from when football was invented in 1975 to when it was suspended in 2001.

That's why they respected us

And this is my dawg bone of contention with @creepycoug . 1992 USC respected us so much that they got the LA Times to take us down. Don had UW in the early 90's where Clemson is now- i.e., Tier II school performing like a blue blood as long as the coach doesn't leave. It would have been shocking if UW didn't win another NT in the 90s w/o Camaro-gate.

It's very simple to know me Yella: I like genuine irreverence and authentic edge. I don't like the mindset of permanence that a lot of people like to have. They have it for the same reason they believe in other fairy tales: they're afraid of uncertainty; they're afraid of dark.

I like program culture that DNGAFF about what USC thinks of anything. This entire thread is another attempt to entrench Washington as the real #2. It's embarrassing and effeminate. With that said, given USC's dominance in virtually every single meaningful football measure against all other members of the conference, I don't blame you for not trying. Maybe it's just impossible to catch up and surpass. Maybe you're right to concede.

With that said, congratulations on cementing Washington's legacy as the next best program in Pac 10 history. The recognition is long overdue.

We don't want to be second best in the West. We want to be on par with USC and we've done it before. For a long period of time - twenty + years in fact - we were on par with USC, in terms of head to head competition, Pac titles, winning percentage, etc. USC is the standard for the PAC, but they rest a bit too much on their laurels and are close to getting booted from Mt Rushmore.

This entire thread is another attempt to entrench Washington as the real #2. It's embarrassing and effeminate.



This is precisely why everyone would likely be better off not responding to *Redacted Poster*.


He starts with an absolute bullshit lie (or just a 100 percent non-truth) and it goes down hill from there.


To anyone who is not invested in this topic like *Redacted Poster* is, this thread (at least the original post and most others after) serves to show how dominant USC has been.


To someone who remains detached from reality, I guess it could be seen as an attempt to prop UW up as a distant second but I, like Grandpa Sankey, don't see it.


I quit responding to the *Redacted Poster* when he tried to suggest that Miami (in its heyday) would have (maybe, could have) sold out the big house 3 times over.


I am still waiting for him to show me where pineapples flourish in western Washington.



*****(perhaps, *Redacted Poster* just doesn't register sarcasm. Example is Race's single sentence response).

@StrongArmCobra