Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PM Pete

Please ditch the Wild Cat, you have the top qb in the country. Defenses don’t fear that crap. They fear your 6’6” strong arm top 10 NFL prospect and and your first round TE Hunter Bryant. Additionally The Pitt Special was better than any of your trick plays in the last 10 years. Please step up your game.

TYFYS

https://www.espn.com/video/clip/_/id/27669764
«13

Comments

  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Pete definitely losing his edge
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    To your point, though, the wildcat, as a concept, is something I've ALWAYS hated. I get the theory: You get an extra blocker at the point of attack and run. But I'd like to see ANY data that suggests it has a higher success rate that a standard running play. I'd bet my house it doesn't.

    Only the dumbest fucking DC on the planet doesn't go cover-0 and bring every single DB on the field up to the LOS. Cool, you just gained one blocker and brought two defenders into the box.

    As to, "Why doesn't he ever hand off to the fly sweep motion?" Maybe because the fucking quarterback is who would be out there lead blocking for that.

    Duuuuuuuuumb.

    The threat of the pass is way more likely to loosen a D than an extra blocker. I don't care how many first downs Dick Newt and Gaskin have gotten from Wildcat over the last three years. Prove to me a standard play* would have been less successful.

    *"Standard play" ≠ speed option with Browning.
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Wildcat has been very successful for us in short yardage situations. I understand wanting the ball in Eason’s hands, but I don’t hate it as much as some of you because it has worked the majority of the time.

    My issue with it there was that Eason was 18/20 at the time, and our run game was averaging less than 3 yards a carry at that time in the game. Eason was in complete control, and yet we chose to remove him from the play.
    we bringing trickery when it was not needed.
  • gmo
    gmo Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,888 Founders Club
    FirePete said:

    Wildcat has been very successful for us in short yardage situations. I understand wanting the ball in Eason’s hands, but I don’t hate it as much as some of you because it has worked the majority of the time.

    My issue with it there was that Eason was 18/20 at the time, and our run game was averaging less than 3 yards a carry at that time in the game. Eason was in complete control, and yet we chose to remove him from the play.
    we bringing trickery when it was not needed.
    Yes, classic case of overthinking it.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,383 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2019
    I don’t think it’s overthinking at all. It’s been a staple of our short yardage plan all year.
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,973

    Wildcat has been very successful for us in short yardage situations. I understand wanting the ball in Eason’s hands, but I don’t hate it as much as some of you because it has worked the majority of the time.

    I’d venture to say it’s not the play but the player, Sanky, Gaskin and now dick