Home› College Football Forum

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UCF

oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
in College Football Forum
Kudos to Stanford for taking on this juggernaut. PAC 12 gets the honor of plungering this dumb team so we can stop hearing about them every year.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    FremontTroll said:

    Stanford is an 8-point underdog.

    lol. I think they beat that overrated, over-ranked team by 3 to 4 touchdowns.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,018 Founders Club
    FremontTroll said:

    Stanford is an 8-point underdog.

    With Costello back is that not an interesting play on Stanford? For recreational purposes only

    I think I need to see more of the Stanford defense that gave up 45 points before putting real money on it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,728
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    FremontTroll said:

    Stanford is an 8-point underdog.

    lol. I think they beat that overrated, over-ranked team by 3 to 4 touchdowns.
    That’s because you are dumb
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    ntxduck said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    FremontTroll said:

    Stanford is an 8-point underdog.

    lol. I think they beat that overrated, over-ranked team by 3 to 4 touchdowns.
    That’s because you are dumb
    Eat paste, halfway quook.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Chad_Thunder_CockChad_Thunder_Cock Member Posts: 10
    Stanford wins 23 - 22 on a fluke missed extra point
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,748
    FremontTroll said:

    RaceBannon said:

    FremontTroll said:

    Stanford is an 8-point underdog.

    With Costello back is that not an interesting play on Stanford? For recreational purposes only

    I think I need to see more of the Stanford defense that gave up 45 points before putting real money on it
    I mean I am certainly not laying the points with UCF. The spread has widened slightly too far in an overreaction to Stanford's two mediocre results and the betting public has overreacted as well with 85% on UCF.

    The thing about David Shaw and Stanford though is that they grind out the inferior teams and avoid upsets but they don't have the gameplan or offensive identity to spring upsets on superior teams. They have been very consistent in this pattern.

    The other thing about Stanford though that has changed is their success running the football. Everyone assumes Stanford is a running team and Bryce Love was one of a long line of hyped Stanford RBs but they were awful last year running and elite in the passing game. 109th in yards per rush attempt vs 15th in yards per pass attempt. We saw this dichotomy in their second half comebacks vs UW and UO. When they needed to pass they were hard to stop with all their big bodied TE/WRs. When they tried to establish the run against good teams they were unsuccessful.

    The running game woes don't seem to have resolved themselves this year and Scarlett is no Love. Does Shaw admit his personnel doesn't match his identity and let KJ loose? Doubtful.

    So I don't think Stanford is likely to pull the upset. If they do it will be a close game I don't see a blowout as at all likely since Shaw will not be aggressive if he gets up early.

    I am watching the game and might take the points. Certainly won't take UCF.
    Excellent poast
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SECDAWGSECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    FremontTroll said:

    RaceBannon said:

    FremontTroll said:

    Stanford is an 8-point underdog.

    With Costello back is that not an interesting play on Stanford? For recreational purposes only

    I think I need to see more of the Stanford defense that gave up 45 points before putting real money on it
    I mean I am certainly not laying the points with UCF. The spread has widened slightly too far in an overreaction to Stanford's two mediocre results and the betting public has overreacted as well with 85% on UCF.

    The thing about David Shaw and Stanford though is that they grind out the inferior teams and avoid upsets but they don't have the gameplan or offensive identity to spring upsets on superior teams. They have been very consistent in this pattern.

    The other thing about Stanford though that has changed is their success running the football. Everyone assumes Stanford is a running team and Bryce Love was one of a long line of hyped Stanford RBs but they were awful last year running and elite in the passing game. 109th in yards per rush attempt vs 15th in yards per pass attempt. We saw this dichotomy in their second half comebacks vs UW and UO. When they needed to pass they were hard to stop with all their big bodied TE/WRs. When they tried to establish the run against good teams they were unsuccessful.

    The running game woes don't seem to have resolved themselves this year and Scarlett is no Love. Does Shaw admit his personnel doesn't match his identity and let KJ loose? Doubtful.

    So I don't think Stanford is likely to pull the upset. If they do it will be a close game I don't see a blowout as at all likely since Shaw will not be aggressive if he gets up early.

    I am watching the game and might take the points. Certainly won't take UCF.



    I think Stanford is going to get made an example out of and be glad to get the hell out of FL and back to Cali after that game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • flatusflatus Member Posts: 1,067
    Bump
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,728
    ntxduck said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    FremontTroll said:

    Stanford is an 8-point underdog.

    lol. I think they beat that overrated, over-ranked team by 3 to 4 touchdowns.
    That’s because you are dumb
    LOL
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    FremontTroll said:

    Stanford is an 8-point underdog.

    lol. I think they beat that overrated, over-ranked team by 3 to 4 touchdowns.
    That’s because you are dumb
    LOL
    Won't be funny next week facing an angry Stanford at the Farm after they got punked by a shit team that belongs in a lower division. Put on the red and white, douche bag, because you're not a real duck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,748
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    FremontTroll said:

    Stanford is an 8-point underdog.

    lol. I think they beat that overrated, over-ranked team by 3 to 4 touchdowns.
    That’s because you are dumb
    LOL
    Won't be funny next week facing an angry Stanford at the Farm after they got punked by a shit team that belongs in a lower division. Put on the red and white, douche bag, because you're not a real duck.
    Wait, you're the dumbass that thought Stanford was winning this game but he's the one who wears red and white?

    That's some great pumpy logic my fren.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,290 Founders Club
    UCF could win the SEC east or whichever ACC division doesnt have clemson
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    PurpleJ said:

    UCF could win the SEC east or whichever ACC division doesnt have clemson

    Or Stanford just sucks. I'm going with that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    This thread aged well
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,262
    OBK. The George Costanza of cfb prgnostion.

    UCF would be competitive in this conference dodo bird.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.