Chip was so brutally arrogant at Oregon. It was great if you were a duck.
Wasn't anything special then. Isn't anything special now.
I'm laughing at all the shit I took when I first joined HH and pointed that out to all the Chippy Ball-Garglers on these boreds.
Amazing what a coach can achieve with top recruits and several billion dollars raining all over the campus from a third-world cheap labor exploiter.
The myth of chip as a good recruiter continues. Chips classes were: 30 12 12 14
The class from before the year he took over was 34. 14 the year before that.
He never had the best class in the conference (and only had 2nd best once). But sure, he only won because he had superior talent.
Chips lost his edge, but it has more to do with the fact that most teams run his stuff now (plagiarizing his shit fucko) and see it in practice daily. His first few years at Oregon, the blur was such a novel concept that on 30% of our offensive plays the defense wasn’t even set
His shit? Novel concept? Fuck Off. That’s exactly what I’m talking about. Google Sam Wyche.
He was the only one running it in the pac12, so teams didn’t know what to do against it. Never said he invented it.
If chip only won because of superior talent and was nothing special, what does that say about Pete who has better recruiting classes and better talent and hasn’t come close in 6 years to dominating the conference like chip did in 4?
Comments
"Play selection in chip Kelly's 3 wins with UCLA"
Confirmed - Chippy likes taking it without lube.
I'm laughing at all the shit I took when I first joined HH and pointed that out to all the Chippy Ball-Garglers on these boreds.
Amazing what a coach can achieve with top recruits and several billion dollars raining all over the campus from a third-world cheap labor exploiter.
30
12
12
14
The class from before the year he took over was 34. 14 the year before that.
He never had the best class in the conference (and only had 2nd best once). But sure, he only won because he had superior talent.
Chips lost his edge, but it has more to do with the fact that most teams run his stuff now (plagiarizing his shit fucko) and see it in practice daily. His first few years at Oregon, the blur was such a novel concept that on 30% of our offensive plays the defense wasn’t even set
If chip only won because of superior talent and was nothing special, what does that say about Pete who has better recruiting classes and better talent and hasn’t come close in 6 years to dominating the conference like chip did in 4?