Jon Wilner
Comments
-
Probably not, especially by week two (I think it will be right there by year's end).nycgobears said:
Pretty much agree with this. I’m not convinced that your defense will be as stout as previous seasons.dhdawg said:
Low scoring, I agree. I would predict that UW wins 20-10 or something. Your defense is legit and your path to victory is by forcing a bunch of turnovers imo.nycgobears said:Me thinks it’s gonna be another really close game.
With that said, we have been nearly invincible at home, and I think your offense is going to do almost nothing against our defense.
But it doesn't have to be as good as it has to stifle your offense.
YKIR -
It won't be as good in the beginning. It will still probably be the best in the PAC.dnc said:
Probably not, especially by week two (I think it will be right there by year's end).nycgobears said:
Pretty much agree with this. I’m not convinced that your defense will be as stout as previous seasons.dhdawg said:
Low scoring, I agree. I would predict that UW wins 20-10 or something. Your defense is legit and your path to victory is by forcing a bunch of turnovers imo.nycgobears said:Me thinks it’s gonna be another really close game.
With that said, we have been nearly invincible at home, and I think your offense is going to do almost nothing against our defense.
But it doesn't have to be as good as it has to stifle your offense.
YKIR
Injury depth will be the only thing that might hold it back by the end of the season. -
And the fucking linebacker depth.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It won't be as good in the beginning. It will still probably be the best in the PAC.dnc said:
Probably not, especially by week two (I think it will be right there by year's end).nycgobears said:
Pretty much agree with this. I’m not convinced that your defense will be as stout as previous seasons.dhdawg said:
Low scoring, I agree. I would predict that UW wins 20-10 or something. Your defense is legit and your path to victory is by forcing a bunch of turnovers imo.nycgobears said:Me thinks it’s gonna be another really close game.
With that said, we have been nearly invincible at home, and I think your offense is going to do almost nothing against our defense.
But it doesn't have to be as good as it has to stifle your offense.
YKIR
Injury depth will be the only thing that might hold it back by the end of the season. -
On Softy he explained it as he feels the huskies have stagnated.YellowSnow said:Wilner has had some good picks in the passed- e.g., Trees over us in 2017. But his going with 9-3 just reeks of media knee jerk thinking about breaking in a new QB and a lot of new starters. We've been a 10 win dynasty with way less talent that we're going to be putting out on the field in 2019. I'm fine with calling Stanford as a loss and maybe one other one, but GTFOH with 9-3.
Haven’t been back to the playoffs. Haven’t won the NY6 games. Losses have increased.
Pretty much ignoring that it was all done with lesser talent and recruiting classes are vastly better. -
He's not entirely wrong.DoogCourics said:
On Softy he explained it as he feels the huskies have stagnated.YellowSnow said:Wilner has had some good picks in the passed- e.g., Trees over us in 2017. But his going with 9-3 just reeks of media knee jerk thinking about breaking in a new QB and a lot of new starters. We've been a 10 win dynasty with way less talent that we're going to be putting out on the field in 2019. I'm fine with calling Stanford as a loss and maybe one other one, but GTFOH with 9-3.
Haven’t been back to the playoffs. Haven’t won the NY6 games. Losses have increased.
Pretty much ignoring that it was all done with lesser talent and recruiting classes are vastly better. -
Lazy ass take by Wilner
-
To echo @Tequilla it just such a lazy ass take by Wilner to say we've "stagnated". Either TBSing matters or it doesn't. The evidence suggests that it very much matters in terms of making it to the CFP year after year and beating Urbs and Dabo in NY6 games. Pete caught lightning in the bottle in 2016 and we had a great run, but 2017 and 2018 are probably more realistic for Washington 1.0 level talent. Washington 2.0 is 27 blue chips on our team that are true freshman or red shirt freshman.DoogCourics said:
On Softy he explained it as he feels the huskies have stagnated.YellowSnow said:Wilner has had some good picks in the passed- e.g., Trees over us in 2017. But his going with 9-3 just reeks of media knee jerk thinking about breaking in a new QB and a lot of new starters. We've been a 10 win dynasty with way less talent that we're going to be putting out on the field in 2019. I'm fine with calling Stanford as a loss and maybe one other one, but GTFOH with 9-3.
Haven’t been back to the playoffs. Haven’t won the NY6 games. Losses have increased.
Pretty much ignoring that it was all done with lesser talent and recruiting classes are vastly better. -
He has dumb point until we win a meaningful game, it maybe lazy but he has a pont. Win to prove them wrongYellowSnow said:
To echo @Tequilla it just such a lazy ass take by Wilner to say we've "stagnated". Either TBSing matters or it doesn't. The evidence suggests that it very much matters in terms of making it to the CFP year after year and beating Urbs and Dabo in NY6 games. Pete caught lightning in the bottle in 2016 and we had a great run, but 2017 and 2018 are probably more realistic for Washington 1.0 level talent. Washington 2.0 is 27 blue chips on our team that are true freshman or red shirt freshman.DoogCourics said:
On Softy he explained it as he feels the huskies have stagnated.YellowSnow said:Wilner has had some good picks in the passed- e.g., Trees over us in 2017. But his going with 9-3 just reeks of media knee jerk thinking about breaking in a new QB and a lot of new starters. We've been a 10 win dynasty with way less talent that we're going to be putting out on the field in 2019. I'm fine with calling Stanford as a loss and maybe one other one, but GTFOH with 9-3.
Haven’t been back to the playoffs. Haven’t won the NY6 games. Losses have increased.
Pretty much ignoring that it was all done with lesser talent and recruiting classes are vastly better. -
Agree wholeheartedly. It's # @FirePete whacko cult until he wins a meaningful bowl game over a top tier opponent. But Pete has show strong signs that he's committed to getting over the hump, however, painful the journey may be at times. We're going no one way or another by 2021 if the Cult of TBS was right or not.FirePete said:
He has dumb point until we win a meaningful game, it maybe lazy but he has a pont. Win to prove them wrongYellowSnow said:
To echo @Tequilla it just such a lazy ass take by Wilner to say we've "stagnated". Either TBSing matters or it doesn't. The evidence suggests that it very much matters in terms of making it to the CFP year after year and beating Urbs and Dabo in NY6 games. Pete caught lightning in the bottle in 2016 and we had a great run, but 2017 and 2018 are probably more realistic for Washington 1.0 level talent. Washington 2.0 is 27 blue chips on our team that are true freshman or red shirt freshman.DoogCourics said:
On Softy he explained it as he feels the huskies have stagnated.YellowSnow said:Wilner has had some good picks in the passed- e.g., Trees over us in 2017. But his going with 9-3 just reeks of media knee jerk thinking about breaking in a new QB and a lot of new starters. We've been a 10 win dynasty with way less talent that we're going to be putting out on the field in 2019. I'm fine with calling Stanford as a loss and maybe one other one, but GTFOH with 9-3.
Haven’t been back to the playoffs. Haven’t won the NY6 games. Losses have increased.
Pretty much ignoring that it was all done with lesser talent and recruiting classes are vastly better. -
the numbers say we are close. Hopefully this is the yearYellowSnow said:
Agree wholeheartedly. It's # @FirePete whacko cult until he wins a meaningful bowl game over a top tier opponent. But Pete has show strong signs that he's committed to getting over the hump, however, painful the journey may be at times. We're going no one way or another by 2021 if the Cult of TBS was right or not.FirePete said:
He has dumb point until we win a meaningful game, it maybe lazy but he has a pont. Win to prove them wrongYellowSnow said:
To echo @Tequilla it just such a lazy ass take by Wilner to say we've "stagnated". Either TBSing matters or it doesn't. The evidence suggests that it very much matters in terms of making it to the CFP year after year and beating Urbs and Dabo in NY6 games. Pete caught lightning in the bottle in 2016 and we had a great run, but 2017 and 2018 are probably more realistic for Washington 1.0 level talent. Washington 2.0 is 27 blue chips on our team that are true freshman or red shirt freshman.DoogCourics said:
On Softy he explained it as he feels the huskies have stagnated.YellowSnow said:Wilner has had some good picks in the passed- e.g., Trees over us in 2017. But his going with 9-3 just reeks of media knee jerk thinking about breaking in a new QB and a lot of new starters. We've been a 10 win dynasty with way less talent that we're going to be putting out on the field in 2019. I'm fine with calling Stanford as a loss and maybe one other one, but GTFOH with 9-3.
Haven’t been back to the playoffs. Haven’t won the NY6 games. Losses have increased.
Pretty much ignoring that it was all done with lesser talent and recruiting classes are vastly better.
