DNC Rigging Election - AGAIN
https://youtu.be/BwjRnXGtkr0Comments
-
Her tits alone should get her an invite.
Not flat as a board Liz Warren.
#noteenboyboobs
-
Man Id smash Tulsi
-
Fo' shizzle, my nizzle.Pitchfork51 said:Man Id smash Tulsi
Not keen on the acne scars but makeup covers that shit up.
-
DNC Rigging Election - AGAIN
-
PurpleThrobber said:
Fo' shizzle, my nizzle.Pitchfork51 said:Man Id smash Tulsi
Not keen on the acne scars but booze covers that shit up. -
AbundancePitchfork51 said:PurpleThrobber said:
Fo' shizzle, my nizzle.Pitchfork51 said:Man Id smash Tulsi
Not keen on the acne scars but booze covers that shit up. -
Political parties are corrupt and favor insiders with money.
More at 11. -
Man, seems like a reason not to vote for the DNC.
Cracks me up each generation has to learn this shit anew about them. -
What a dishonest video. The DNC isn't changing the rule - Gabbard wants them to change the rules.
I actually agree with Gabbard and others like Steyer who have received 2% in numerous state or national polls that now want those polls to be added to the list but let's be clear here - it's Gabbard and Steyer and others that are petitioning to change the rules, not the DNC. -
You mean like those who want to change the rules on the electoral college?GDS said:What a dishonest video. The DNC isn't changing the rule - Gabbard wants them to change the rules.
I actually agree with Gabbard and others like Steyer who have received 2% in numerous state or national polls that now want those polls to be added to the list but let's be clear here - it's Gabbard and Steyer and others that are petitioning to change the rules, not the DNC.
Or is changing rules only convenient when it fits the Central Party's mandate?
Free Tulsi's Ta Tas!!!!
-
again - I agree with Gabbard and others that want the rules changed. But it's Gabbard and others that want to change the rules, not the DNC.PurpleThrobber said:
You mean like those who want to change the rules on the electoral college?GDS said:What a dishonest video. The DNC isn't changing the rule - Gabbard wants them to change the rules.
I actually agree with Gabbard and others like Steyer who have received 2% in numerous state or national polls that now want those polls to be added to the list but let's be clear here - it's Gabbard and Steyer and others that are petitioning to change the rules, not the DNC.
Or is changing rules only convenient when it fits the Central Party's mandate?
Free Tulsi's Ta Tas!!!! -
It's not about changing the rules you fucking dullard.GDS said:
again - I agree with Gabbard and others that want the rules changed. But it's Gabbard and others that want to change the rules, not the DNC.PurpleThrobber said:
You mean like those who want to change the rules on the electoral college?GDS said:What a dishonest video. The DNC isn't changing the rule - Gabbard wants them to change the rules.
I actually agree with Gabbard and others like Steyer who have received 2% in numerous state or national polls that now want those polls to be added to the list but let's be clear here - it's Gabbard and Steyer and others that are petitioning to change the rules, not the DNC.
Or is changing rules only convenient when it fits the Central Party's mandate?
Free Tulsi's Ta Tas!!!!
It's about a complete lack of transparency and the arbitrary outcomes thereto.
You know, exactly how they railroaded Bernie and the American people in '16.
-
You'd have a great point except for the fact they were completely transparent in which polls were on the approved list from the beginning. Months ago. Dullard.pawz said:
It's not about changing the rules you fucking dullard.GDS said:
again - I agree with Gabbard and others that want the rules changed. But it's Gabbard and others that want to change the rules, not the DNC.PurpleThrobber said:
You mean like those who want to change the rules on the electoral college?GDS said:What a dishonest video. The DNC isn't changing the rule - Gabbard wants them to change the rules.
I actually agree with Gabbard and others like Steyer who have received 2% in numerous state or national polls that now want those polls to be added to the list but let's be clear here - it's Gabbard and Steyer and others that are petitioning to change the rules, not the DNC.
Or is changing rules only convenient when it fits the Central Party's mandate?
Free Tulsi's Ta Tas!!!!
It's about a complete lack of transparency and the arbitrary outcomes thereto.
You know, exactly how they railroaded Bernie and the American people in '16. -
The only point you made here is about the one on your head.GDS said:
You'd have a great point except for the fact they were completely transparent in which polls were on the approved list from the beginning. Months ago. Dullard.pawz said:
It's not about changing the rules you fucking dullard.GDS said:
again - I agree with Gabbard and others that want the rules changed. But it's Gabbard and others that want to change the rules, not the DNC.PurpleThrobber said:
You mean like those who want to change the rules on the electoral college?GDS said:What a dishonest video. The DNC isn't changing the rule - Gabbard wants them to change the rules.
I actually agree with Gabbard and others like Steyer who have received 2% in numerous state or national polls that now want those polls to be added to the list but let's be clear here - it's Gabbard and Steyer and others that are petitioning to change the rules, not the DNC.
Or is changing rules only convenient when it fits the Central Party's mandate?
Free Tulsi's Ta Tas!!!!
It's about a complete lack of transparency and the arbitrary outcomes thereto.
You know, exactly how they railroaded Bernie and the American people in '16. -
Sure.GDS said:
You'd have a great point except for the fact they were completely transparent in which polls were on the approved list from the beginning. Months ago. Dullard.pawz said:
It's not about changing the rules you fucking dullard.GDS said:
again - I agree with Gabbard and others that want the rules changed. But it's Gabbard and others that want to change the rules, not the DNC.PurpleThrobber said:
You mean like those who want to change the rules on the electoral college?GDS said:What a dishonest video. The DNC isn't changing the rule - Gabbard wants them to change the rules.
I actually agree with Gabbard and others like Steyer who have received 2% in numerous state or national polls that now want those polls to be added to the list but let's be clear here - it's Gabbard and Steyer and others that are petitioning to change the rules, not the DNC.
Or is changing rules only convenient when it fits the Central Party's mandate?
Free Tulsi's Ta Tas!!!!
It's about a complete lack of transparency and the arbitrary outcomes thereto.
You know, exactly how they railroaded Bernie and the American people in '16.
#HondoBros #lapdog -
So the DNC rigged the game for sure winner Hillary who didn't so why not rig it again for sure winner Joe
@allpurpleallgold
Let the democrats decide and lets get this socialism v capitalism death match going
-
What are the splotches on her face? Is she related to Mikhail Gorbachev?
-
You realize you're wasting your breath on that brainwashed/brain-dead fuck, right?pawz said:
It's not about changing the rules you fucking dullard.GDS said:
again - I agree with Gabbard and others that want the rules changed. But it's Gabbard and others that want to change the rules, not the DNC.PurpleThrobber said:
You mean like those who want to change the rules on the electoral college?GDS said:What a dishonest video. The DNC isn't changing the rule - Gabbard wants them to change the rules.
I actually agree with Gabbard and others like Steyer who have received 2% in numerous state or national polls that now want those polls to be added to the list but let's be clear here - it's Gabbard and Steyer and others that are petitioning to change the rules, not the DNC.
Or is changing rules only convenient when it fits the Central Party's mandate?
Free Tulsi's Ta Tas!!!!
It's about a complete lack of transparency and the arbitrary outcomes thereto.
You know, exactly how they railroaded Bernie and the American people in '16. -
Dude posts a video about the DNC changing the rules for the debates when in fact it’s the candidates trying to change the rules, then cries about transparency when the rules have been upfront and posted for months and I’m the brainwashed one. Turd burglar should have retired 12 concussions ago...
-
GDS: Duller than a butter knife.GDS said:Dude posts a video about the DNC changing the rules for the debates when in fact it’s the candidates trying to change the rules, then cries about transparency when the rules have been upfront and posted for months and I’m the brainwashed one. Turd burglar should have retired 12 concussions ago...
There's a HRC crying board somewhere. People here like to have fun. Which makes you a misfit. Go find the "Fags for Hillary" board and wet blanket that site instead. -
Whatever happened to the simple art of just flipping her over so you don't have to look at her face?Pitchfork51 said:PurpleThrobber said:
Fo' shizzle, my nizzle.Pitchfork51 said:Man Id smash Tulsi
Not keen on the acne scars but booze covers that shit up. -
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/how-the-dnc-is-unfairly-tilting-the-field-against-tulsi-gabbard
After the fiasco that was the 2016 Democratic presidential primary, the Democratic National Committee doesn’t exactly have a reputation for impartiality and fairness. You’d think, then, the DNC would take steps this time around to ensure that its decision-making is transparent and bias-free.
Naturally, they’re doing the opposite.
The most recent issue is the DNC’s qualification criteria for the third Democratic primary debate set for September. The DNC has understandably sought to cut down on the number of candidates granted a place on the debate stage, and they’ve done so by putting in place more stringent qualification requirements. Now, candidates must show four DNC-approved polls placing them at 2% or higher, and they must also receive 130,000 unique donations.
If applied fairly, these standards are reasonable enough. They proved easy hurdles to overcome for the big-name candidates, with Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and the like all long-since qualifying, just as you'd expect. But it’s the borderline candidates who have been harmed the most by arbitrary and potentially biased enforcement of these criteria. Candidates such as Tom Steyer and Marrianne Williamson have suffered, but most clearly disadvantaged by DNC malpractice is Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard.
Here’s where the bias comes in: The decision as to which polls are “DNC-approved” and which are not. Several of these campaigns have met the polling threshold in more than four reputable polls, just not the ones approved by the DNC, whose criteria for poll approval are unknown and opaque.
This is particularly true for Gabbard. The Gabbard campaign provided a statement to the Washington Examiner:
Rep. Gabbard has exceeded 2% support in 26 national and early state polls, but only two of them are on the DNC’s ‘certified’ list. Many of the uncertified polls, including those conducted by highly reputable organizations such as The Economist and the Boston Globe, are ranked by RealClearPolitics and FiveThirtyEight as more accurate than some DNC ‘certified’ polls.
This is manifestly unjust. And given the DNC’s long history of bias against outsider, anti-establishment candidates, it’s unlikely that this injustice is an accident.
Remember, the DNC basically tilted the 2016 Democratic primary against Sanders, and in favor of the party establishment’s preferred candidate, Hillary Clinton. They gave Clinton debate questions in advance, planned debates for weekends (perhaps to shield Clinton from high viewership), and leaked emails showed numerous examples of anti-Sanders bias from DNC officials.
Plus, the DNC and the Clinton campaign even had a signed agreement giving Clinton’s camp control over party staffing decisions before she was the nominee.
As journalist Michael Tracey wrote for RealClearPolitics, “Tulsi Gabbard is on the verge of being excluded from the next Democratic presidential debate on the basis of criteria that appear increasingly absurd.” If the DNC wants to avoid more allegations of bias, it should step in and make sure Gabbard is granted the debate stage place she clearly deserves.
-
#problemsolverSwaye said:
Whatever happened to the simple art of just flipping her over so you don't have to look at her face?Pitchfork51 said:PurpleThrobber said:
Fo' shizzle, my nizzle.Pitchfork51 said:Man Id smash Tulsi
Not keen on the acne scars but booze covers that shit up.
