Coug Center: "Despite UW's quarterback question marks, that schedule (as always) is a laugher"
Comments
-
@Mooser42 true?!Cougarfs said:Every fan base has a healthy share of dummies. It’s what makes the sport great and fun...listening to how dumb we can get. Also, coogcenter dot com sucks. In honor of National Dog Day, you should bake a cake and deliver it to a garbage coach who all the “smart” DogFans wanted to lead the program. Go Eastern Eagles!!!!
GreenRiverGatorz said:I don't know if cuog fans are disproportionately stupid or not, relative to other CFB fan bases.
-
I remember the glorious days before the Bender Apple Cup when Cuogs everywhere were so confident that Bender was a much better QB and the key to a WSU victory.DoogCourics said:
BUTLUCK is a term I came up with that means a person, thing, team, gets EXTREMELY LUCKY in BEATING the extremely bad, low odds, percents, chances, where they either shouldnt, extremely unlikely, almost impossible to do that.PurpleBaze said:Can't wait to beat a GOOD WSU team to see what their new set of excuses.
The Fuskies got BUTLUCKY that against WSU:
1. They got to play 2nd, 3rd string back up, etc, Bender, instead of Falk
2. When they did play Falk, that Falk was recovering from a borderline slight concussion.
3. That they got to play in a snow storm that shut down WSU's offense, passing game, that is better suited to help the Fuskies non pass heavy, run based offense to win. Minshew, WSU would have won that game if not for the snowstorm.
So far during Leach's Tenure the Fuskies have gotten BUTLUCKY against WSU teams that would, could, should, beat the fuskies.
The only time the Fuskies didnt get BUTLUCKY was against the 2, 3-9 Leach, WSU teams.
Some Keep on saying that WSU hasnt proven that they can beat the Fuskies, during Leach's Tenure.
Well I say the Fuskies have only proven they can beat 2, 3-9 Leach teams, and havent proven that they can beat WSU's good teams, because the Fuskies didnt BEAT WSU's good teams(Technically won yes), they BUTLUCKED, got BUTLUCKY against WSU's teams. Thats not BEATING WSU's teams.
So the Fuskies havent proven they can beat Leach's good WSU teams
-
Damn you and your 53 seconds.huskyhooligan said:I've been trying to get BUTLUCKY for a week now.
Pre and post tailgate Apple Cups are always the best. I still remember the cuogs talking about Bender being better than Falk pregame, things like 'Leach hand picked him.' Then after the game, completely different story.
-
This is the kind of deep introspective analysis I have come to expect from the denizens of Pullman.DoogCourics said:I can’t stop!!!!!!
UW has been the better team in TWO, 2, 3, THREE, out of the last 6, 7 Apple cup games, vs 2, 3-9, 1, 6-6 WSU teams.
But UW has not BEATEN(They Technically Won Yes), the 2,3, 8,9,11 win WSU teams, and UW got LUCKY against those specific 2,3 WSU teams.
UW did semi earn those wins, because using your SUV example, they built the SUV, while WSU built the Sports Car, and UW still had to play the game.
But my Boxing analogy is more accurate.
Boxing Analogy:
Say there are 2 Pro Boxers, 9 win UW Boxer, 9 win WSU Boxer, and lets say that 1 hour before the fight, WSU Boxer breaks arm, has to fight with broken arm tied behind WSU Boxer back, leading to UW Boxer GETTING LUCKY to win vs WSU Boxer.
That applies to Football.
8,9, 11 win WSU has had to play 2,3 games against 2,3, 9 win UW teams, with a PROVERBIAL BROKEN ARM TIED BEHIND BACK, so because of that, no wonder UW GOT LUCKY to win those games
Also if the roles were reversed, we all know that NO ONE would give credit to WSU for Beating UW, that they would say that WSU GOT LUCKY to win against a UW team with a proverbial broken arm.
-
Playing WSU instead of ourselves lowers our SOS
HTH -
This is what 3 years of getting plungered in the biggest game of the year that you have had circled since the year before will do to you.
-
If cougs lose the apple cup = not a good Leach team
If cougs win apple cup = was a good Leach team and UW can’t beat a good Leach team
