Coug Center: "Despite UW's quarterback question marks, that schedule (as always) is a laugher"
Comments
-
UW has to get BUTLUCKY to beat a GOOD WSU LEACH TEAM.
-
So... much... AIDS...
-
I can’t stop!!!!!!
UW has been the better team in TWO, 2, 3, THREE, out of the last 6, 7 Apple cup games, vs 2, 3-9, 1, 6-6 WSU teams.
But UW has not BEATEN(They Technically Won Yes), the 2,3, 8,9,11 win WSU teams, and UW got LUCKY against those specific 2,3 WSU teams.
UW did semi earn those wins, because using your SUV example, they built the SUV, while WSU built the Sports Car, and UW still had to play the game.
But my Boxing analogy is more accurate.
Boxing Analogy:
Say there are 2 Pro Boxers, 9 win UW Boxer, 9 win WSU Boxer, and lets say that 1 hour before the fight, WSU Boxer breaks arm, has to fight with broken arm tied behind WSU Boxer back, leading to UW Boxer GETTING LUCKY to win vs WSU Boxer.
That applies to Football.
8,9, 11 win WSU has had to play 2,3 games against 2,3, 9 win UW teams, with a PROVERBIAL BROKEN ARM TIED BEHIND BACK, so because of that, no wonder UW GOT LUCKY to win those games
Also if the roles were reversed, we all know that NO ONE would give credit to WSU for Beating UW, that they would say that WSU GOT LUCKY to win against a UW team with a proverbial broken arm. -
Holy fucking cuog
-
No way - a fucking tool like this douch made up the term, “but lucky?”
Shocker. You don’t say! -
Yes, they won. Technically.DoogCourics said:
IF, WHEN, IF the Fuskies beat a GOOD Leach, WSU team that win 8 to 11 games that:NoWarningJustDawg said:Obligatory: "our schedules would certainly be much tougher if we could replace playing a team like the Coogs annually with playing a team like Washington"
1. Not starting 2nd, 3rd string, BENDER like QB, due to a injury of a GOOD STARTING QB
2. The GOOD Starting QB, recovering from a condition like a concussion, injury.
3. A Snowstorm that dump 1/2 foot to 1 and 1/2, 1.5 feet of snow that will stop a AIR RAID OFFENSE, but BENEFIT a UW power running game
UNTIL, IF THAT HAPPENS, ITS LUCK, UNTIL THAT HAPPENS.
And IF that happens, THEN you can rightly say that UW beat a GOOD Leach, WSU team.
Untii then, you can't rightly say that UW beat a GOOD Leach,WSU team during Leach's Tenure at WSU.
Would UW have beaten a GOOD WSU LEACH team if UW had to play without STARTING QB BROWNING, due to injury, if Browning had been injured?
PROBABLY NOT.
And if WSU had technically won against that without Browning UW team, could WSU have rightly claimed it BEAT UW?
NO
And if UW was a AIR RAID team, and WSU was a POWER RUNNING team, and if a Snow storm dumped snow, that shut down a UW AIR RAID, and were to benefit a WSU Power Running game, so that WSU technically won vs UW, could WSU rightly claim that BEAT UW?
No
Not only that, but the SPORTS MEDIA, the Pollsters, etc, would not give WSU any credit, and would say that WSU just got LUCKY, to TECHNICALLY win.
Its a FREAKING DOUBLE STANDARD.
So until, if UW actually beats, not just technically, luckily win, but beats a GOOD WSU, LEACH TEAM, WITH ITS GOOD STARTING QB, AND WITHOUT 1+ KEY, VITAL TO WINNING PLAYERS BEING INJURED, AND WITHOUT EXTREME BAD WEATHER THAT SHUT DOWN AIR RAID, ETC, FULL STRENGTH, ETC.
UNTIL, IF THAT HAPPENS, UW CAN'T rightly say that BEAT a GOOD WSU LEACH team.
They can rightly say they TECHNICALLY WON vs WSU.
lol - holy fuck. -
Both teams play a shitty non-con schedule, and are in the P12. WSU flips the home and away of Stanford and Utah with us (which is pretty much a wash), so basically the differences are we host Oregon versus them playing in Autzen, and they miss USC (which is historically a near guaranteed loss for WSU).
What the hell am I missing here? -
Schizophrenia.BleachedAnusDawg said:Both teams play a shitty non-con schedule, and are in the P12. WSU flips the home and away of Stanford and Utah with us (which is pretty much a wash), so basically the differences are we host Oregon versus them playing in Autzen, and they miss USC (which is historically a near guaranteed loss for WSU).
What the hell am I missing here? -
An extra chromosome?BleachedAnusDawg said:Both teams play a shitty non-con schedule, and are in the P12. WSU flips the home and away of Stanford and Utah with us (which is pretty much a wash), so basically the differences are we host Oregon versus them playing in Autzen, and they miss USC (which is historically a near guaranteed loss for WSU).
What the hell am I missing here? -
BleachedAnusDawg said:
Both teams play a shitty non-con schedule, and are in the P12. WSU flips the home and away of Stanford and Utah with us (which is pretty much a wash), so basically the differences are we host Oregon versus them playing in Autzen, and they miss USC (which is historically a near guaranteed loss for WSU).
What the hell am I missing here?
Other than UW gets the COUGS at home while CUOG has to travel to Seattle, you aren't missing a thing.
Just.Fucking.Cuog.Christ
