Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hugh Millen and Doogman Trigger Warning

13

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    Lol. Aaron Fuller isn’t a great blocker on the bubble screen. I for one am *shocked* by this revelation.

    I take back all the good things I said about Aaron Fuller’s blocking.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,808 Swaye's Wigwam
    dnc said:

    Lol. Aaron Fuller isn’t a great blocker on the bubble screen. I for one am *shocked* by this revelation.

    I take back all the good things I said about Aaron Fuller’s blocking.

    Ah come on with the sarcasm. All I'm saying is that Hugh highlights a couple of examples of Fuller playing exactly how I suspect he plays most of the time. Maybe it's not true? I think it's pretty much his game though.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    The first couple minutes of the video shows exactly why Fuller isn’t good

    Because he got blown up on a block? Seriously?
    chuck said:

    dnc said:

    Lol. Aaron Fuller isn’t a great blocker on the bubble screen. I for one am *shocked* by this revelation.

    I take back all the good things I said about Aaron Fuller’s blocking.

    Ah come on with the sarcasm. All I'm saying is that Hugh highlights a couple of examples of Fuller playing exactly how I suspect he plays most of the time. Maybe it's not true? I think it's pretty much his game though.
    Wasn't aimed at you.

    But yeah I think you're reading too much into a couple of bubble screens.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    Gladstone said:

    Ok watched some more this morning.

    Browning of course locks on to a receiver almost every play and never gets to a second read even if first option is blanketed.

    But the curious thing is that there is no rhyme or rhythym to which receiver he locks onto. Hugh is continually pointing out that the targeted receiver has a bad matchup and there was a different matchup that could have been exploited.

    Whatever happened to the pre-snap wizard Browning that supposedly existed in 2016?

    Smoke and mirrors. And John Ross.

    The first 7 games we had:
    - 3 garbage OOCs.
    - Stanford with both starting CBs out injured and coming off a grueling, emotionally draining 4Q comeback at UCLA.
    - Historically bad Oregon defense
    - Oregon State and Arizona.

    Utah 2016 was the beginning of the end as Browning made some OK throws but also struggled, throwing a momentum-killing interception when we were up 14-0 and about to plunger them. Just a terrible read and even worse throw that completely rejuvenated Utah and made it a barnburner.

    USC of course finally exposed him. One of the worst QB performances you'll ever see. Fouch would have done worse, but not by much.

    By Colorado he could barely even throw a forward pass with confidence. And he was likely injured.

    If you watch Rutgers 2016 his arm definitely had more zip on it. He never got it back.
    As I recall, this play against Oregon State is supposedly what killed whatever arm Jake had


    Did it blow up his brain too?

    Or was the pre-snap stuff always just a myth since the media and fans needed a story and we knew he didn't have a strong or accurate arm and wasn't a leader?