Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Which Power Conference Is Surprisingly Absent From the Pre-Season Top 10
Comments
-
"he's got physical talent but a between the ears issue"
So he's not good at football? Maybe he should run fucking track. -
Herbie's got all of the tools, none of the buildings.Pitchfork51 said:"he's got physical talent but a between the ears issue"
So he's not good at football? Maybe he should run fucking track.
-
He’s an inconsistent QB that has talent. He’s big, has a strong arm, and has made highlight throws. He’s not anything special.
-
If UW had Herbert instead of Browning we are +2 more wins last year. Herbert is pretty overrated though. A slightly better Locker. If you think I'm being a UW homer, let's look at the tape vs a garbage Arizona team after they beat UW and controlled their own destiny.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLjqcnuCF34 -
He might end up a better pro, one of those guys who is better with better dudes around him. Go through that twitter thread. Or he's one of those dime a dozen blue chip college basketball wings who are 6'7 and jump through the roof but can't shoot.Gladstone said:If UW had Herbert instead of Browning we are +2 more wins last year. Herbert is pretty overrated though. A slightly better Locker. If you think I'm being a UW homer, let's look at the tape vs a garbage Arizona team after they beat UW and controlled their own destiny.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLjqcnuCF34 -
That's not a great throw. Catchable, but not great.dtd said:
tldr: prolly, no, no.Pitchfork51 said:Honestly bias aside is he actually that good?
Everyone talks about how good he is but I don't remember him much from our game. Wasn't he injured most of the year?
Has he ever actually done anything?
He was bad against ASU last year, missed a number of big throws.
He throws a great deep ball, is generally very accurate on high difficulty throws, but struggles at reads and touch on the shorter routes. He was hurt his senior? year in HS, didn't win the starting job until week 5? his freshman year at Oregon, broke his collarbone and missed 5 games his sophomore season, and last year had the worst receiving corps at Oregon since the '80s. One of those twatter analysts counted 52 drops last year. Probably the biggest issue with him, other than the drops, is timing, and perhaps that's related to experience. I dunno.
Go through these throws and tell me he doesn't have elite physical talent. It's a between the ears issue, maybe it's due to missing his senior year in HS and 25% of the games at Oregon. Also, look at the windows he's throwing into. There's hardly any separation at all. Gone are the days where Darron Thomas could throw to a dude without a defender within 10 yards and people would say "yeah but only cuz he was wide open", but now Herbert gets shit on because dudes can't get open? Okay. As a sophomore he was at 67% completion at over 9ypa. Go back through the stats and look at the P5 guys who do that each year. Lotta Heisman winners(not suggesting he will even be in the conversation).
Obviously better than Browning.
We heard the "butt the drops" excuses with Lockner for years (and he was Kearse'd with Jermaine, after all) but his projected increase in completion percentage once he got to the pros never materialized. He was just as inconsistent. My guess is Herbert's career arc is slightly higher altitude but ultimately the same trajectory. We'll see. He's definitely got plenty of arm talent. -
Which throw? There are tons of them in that thread, most of which doogs are already shitting themselves over when Eason makes one. Also, Lockner? Come the fuck on, they're nothing alike. Jack was an all pro jumbo WR playing QB. 54% career completion? Lazy as fuck comp.dnc said:
That's not a great throw. Catchable, but not great.dtd said:
tldr: prolly, no, no.Pitchfork51 said:Honestly bias aside is he actually that good?
Everyone talks about how good he is but I don't remember him much from our game. Wasn't he injured most of the year?
Has he ever actually done anything?
He was bad against ASU last year, missed a number of big throws.
He throws a great deep ball, is generally very accurate on high difficulty throws, but struggles at reads and touch on the shorter routes. He was hurt his senior? year in HS, didn't win the starting job until week 5? his freshman year at Oregon, broke his collarbone and missed 5 games his sophomore season, and last year had the worst receiving corps at Oregon since the '80s. One of those twatter analysts counted 52 drops last year. Probably the biggest issue with him, other than the drops, is timing, and perhaps that's related to experience. I dunno.
Go through these throws and tell me he doesn't have elite physical talent. It's a between the ears issue, maybe it's due to missing his senior year in HS and 25% of the games at Oregon. Also, look at the windows he's throwing into. There's hardly any separation at all. Gone are the days where Darron Thomas could throw to a dude without a defender within 10 yards and people would say "yeah but only cuz he was wide open", but now Herbert gets shit on because dudes can't get open? Okay. As a sophomore he was at 67% completion at over 9ypa. Go back through the stats and look at the P5 guys who do that each year. Lotta Heisman winners(not suggesting he will even be in the conversation).
Obviously better than Browning.
We heard the "butt the drops" excuses with Lockner for years (and he was Kearse'd with Jermaine, after all) but his projected increase in completion percentage once he got to the pros never materialized. He was just as inconsistent. My guess is Herbert's career arc is slightly higher altitude but ultimately the same trajectory. We'll see. He's definitely got plenty of arm talent. -
The one in the tweet you posted. I didn't see any thread.dtd said:
Which throw? There are tons of them in that thread, most of which doogs are already shitting themselves over when Eason makes one. Also, Lockner? Come the fuck on, they're nothing alike. Jack was an all pro jumbo WR playing QB. 54% career completion? Lazy as fuck comp.dnc said:
That's not a great throw. Catchable, but not great.dtd said:
tldr: prolly, no, no.Pitchfork51 said:Honestly bias aside is he actually that good?
Everyone talks about how good he is but I don't remember him much from our game. Wasn't he injured most of the year?
Has he ever actually done anything?
He was bad against ASU last year, missed a number of big throws.
He throws a great deep ball, is generally very accurate on high difficulty throws, but struggles at reads and touch on the shorter routes. He was hurt his senior? year in HS, didn't win the starting job until week 5? his freshman year at Oregon, broke his collarbone and missed 5 games his sophomore season, and last year had the worst receiving corps at Oregon since the '80s. One of those twatter analysts counted 52 drops last year. Probably the biggest issue with him, other than the drops, is timing, and perhaps that's related to experience. I dunno.
Go through these throws and tell me he doesn't have elite physical talent. It's a between the ears issue, maybe it's due to missing his senior year in HS and 25% of the games at Oregon. Also, look at the windows he's throwing into. There's hardly any separation at all. Gone are the days where Darron Thomas could throw to a dude without a defender within 10 yards and people would say "yeah but only cuz he was wide open", but now Herbert gets shit on because dudes can't get open? Okay. As a sophomore he was at 67% completion at over 9ypa. Go back through the stats and look at the P5 guys who do that each year. Lotta Heisman winners(not suggesting he will even be in the conversation).
Obviously better than Browning.
We heard the "butt the drops" excuses with Lockner for years (and he was Kearse'd with Jermaine, after all) but his projected increase in completion percentage once he got to the pros never materialized. He was just as inconsistent. My guess is Herbert's career arc is slightly higher altitude but ultimately the same trajectory. We'll see. He's definitely got plenty of arm talent.
I'm not shitting myself over anything Eason has done so don't lump me in that group. I have been very skeptical about Eason from the start. All I've said is I think he'll be a big improvement over Browning. Which I feel the same about Herbert.
I said I think Herbert has a higher altitude than Locker. He's clearly better. But there are plenty of similarities. -
Meaning Herbert > Browning not Eason > Herbert.
-
Get off your fucking flip phone and scroll or swipe or whatever man, come on. You're not @RaceBannondnc said:
The one in the tweet you posted. I didn't see any thread.dtd said:
Which throw? There are tons of them in that thread, most of which doogs are already shitting themselves over when Eason makes one. Also, Lockner? Come the fuck on, they're nothing alike. Jack was an all pro jumbo WR playing QB. 54% career completion? Lazy as fuck comp.dnc said:
That's not a great throw. Catchable, but not great.dtd said:
tldr: prolly, no, no.Pitchfork51 said:Honestly bias aside is he actually that good?
Everyone talks about how good he is but I don't remember him much from our game. Wasn't he injured most of the year?
Has he ever actually done anything?
He was bad against ASU last year, missed a number of big throws.
He throws a great deep ball, is generally very accurate on high difficulty throws, but struggles at reads and touch on the shorter routes. He was hurt his senior? year in HS, didn't win the starting job until week 5? his freshman year at Oregon, broke his collarbone and missed 5 games his sophomore season, and last year had the worst receiving corps at Oregon since the '80s. One of those twatter analysts counted 52 drops last year. Probably the biggest issue with him, other than the drops, is timing, and perhaps that's related to experience. I dunno.
Go through these throws and tell me he doesn't have elite physical talent. It's a between the ears issue, maybe it's due to missing his senior year in HS and 25% of the games at Oregon. Also, look at the windows he's throwing into. There's hardly any separation at all. Gone are the days where Darron Thomas could throw to a dude without a defender within 10 yards and people would say "yeah but only cuz he was wide open", but now Herbert gets shit on because dudes can't get open? Okay. As a sophomore he was at 67% completion at over 9ypa. Go back through the stats and look at the P5 guys who do that each year. Lotta Heisman winners(not suggesting he will even be in the conversation).
Obviously better than Browning.
We heard the "butt the drops" excuses with Lockner for years (and he was Kearse'd with Jermaine, after all) but his projected increase in completion percentage once he got to the pros never materialized. He was just as inconsistent. My guess is Herbert's career arc is slightly higher altitude but ultimately the same trajectory. We'll see. He's definitely got plenty of arm talent.
I'm not shitting myself over anything Eason has done so don't lump me in that group. I have been very skeptical about Eason from the start. All I've said is I think he'll be a big improvement over Browning. Which I feel the same about Herbert.
I said I think Herbert has a higher altitude than Locker. He's clearly better. But there are plenty of similarities.
Also, you know who Herbert is similar to? Fucking Jacob Eason. Get the fuck out of here with that Lockner nonsense. And pull your fucking head out, that ball is pushing 65 yards in the air like it's nothing and was spot on. Eason pumps a 25 yard seam route once in PRACTICE like Herbert does a dozen times in that thread and half the halfbrains keyboards are too sticky to work. Trrrriggered.
