Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
With Mueller now expendable the NYTimes can finally tell us...
Soon after the special counsel's office opened in 2017, some aides noticed that Robert S. Mueller III kept noticeably shorter hours than he had as F.B.I. director, when he showed up at the bureau daily at 6 a.m. and often worked nights.
He seemed to cede substantial responsibility to his top deputies, including Aaron Zebley, who managed day-to-day operations and often reported on the investigation's progress up the chain in the Justice Department. As negotiations with President Trump's lawyers about interviewing him dragged on, for example, Mr. Mueller took part less and less, according to people familiar with how the office worked.
That hands-off style was on display Wednesday when Mr. Mueller testified for about seven hours before two House committees. Once famous for his laserlike focus, Mr. Mueller, who will turn 75 next month, seemed hesitant about the facts in his own 448-page report. He struggled at one point to come up with the word "conspiracy."
0 ·
Comments
And btw, the fact that Hillary and her aides were never charged with obstruction of justice when they intentionally destroyed subpoenaed evidence tells you all you need to know about the Obama DOJ and these fuckers have the gall to say Barr is running interference for Trump?
NY Times = Modern day equivalent of Der Sturmer, Pravda
I can't wait until we get to the oranges of the investigation!
Unless it was being said about a Republican and then you could pretend that you didn't understand the comparison.
On May 17, the U.S. Department of Justice gave Robert Mueller a mission at once simple and daunting: investigate the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election; uncover any coordination between Moscow and members of Donald Trump’s campaign; and prosecute any crimes that were committed in the process.
Since Mueller took up that task, the special counsel has held the country in his thrall. Backed by an independent budget, rare bipartisan support and a team of veteran cops and prosecutors, he has made news even when he tried not to. Loose-lipped lawyers for Trump and his associates leaked details of the probe to the media. Scraps of evidence made their way into public view from separate investigations in Congress. And the President, not known to be a target of the probe himself, fumed publicly as his first year in office was consumed by the once-in-a-generation spectacle of a powerful prosecutor on the trail of the President's men.
Ah it seems like just yesterday
https://washingtonpost.com/politics/2017/live-updates/trump-white-house/trump-comey-and-russia-how-key-washington-players-are-reacting/congress-is-full-of-personal-praise-for-mueller/?utm_term=.3da9d6f5dcad
en. John McCain, a Republican from Arizona, called Robert Mueller “a great choice for special counsel.” Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a Democrat from New York, called him “exactly the right kind of individual to serve as a special counsel in the Russia investigation.”
The initial reactions from many members of Congress were full of praise for the former FBI director.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), while offering cautions on Mueller’s ability to conduct an independent investigation, called him “someone with a history of expertise and experience with the guts and backbone to stand up and speak out against any kind of political influence.”
Rep. Peter J. Roskam (R-Ill.) called him “a man of the utmost integrity.”
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) called Mueller “somebody we all trust.”
“There’s not anybody with as much credibility internally or whose integrity is as unimpeachable as Bob Mueller,” said Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
There were a few members who were less openly enthused.
“I’m fine with it,” said Rep. Bill Flores (R-Texas), who was among those who had resisted an independent prosecutor.
Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), chairman of the generally pro-Trump House Freedom Caucus, called it “a prudent move, and it certainly means that the administration is taking it seriously.”
But he suggested Mueller “comes with more credibility on the Democrat side than on the Republican side,” a remark he said was based on “sworn testimony that he’s given here on Capitol Hill since I’ve been here.”
Sounds kind of lazy
We heard for weeks it was over a video so you must think it was over a video right?
Owl, the fact you use Benghazi as some sort of gotcha point is the dumbest thing you could possibly do. It is inappropriate just like the stone walling your dem leaders did during the investigation.
The left is just disgusting.