Mueller is now receiving an afternoon ass reaming

SFGbob

Office of Exoneration

HoustonHusky

Past his nap time...holy shite...

RaceBannon

http://twitter.com/AndrewHClark/status/1154078774775963649?s=19

RaceBannon

Democrat twitter is obsessed over what Mueller didn't say

SFGbob

I'm bummed he is covering up for the "documented fact." He was just asked about the Trump Tower meeting and not only didn't he support the "documented fact" the Rat asking the question didn't support the documented fact.

And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.

PurpleThrobber

More chunky chick in blue dress, less repeat the question Uncle Bob.

SFGbob

http://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1154027027412000770

SFGbob

Weird how an investigation that was tasked to investigate Russian interference with our election showed absolutely no interest in what role Russia played in providing information to Steele that Hillary paid for.

Swaye

RaceBannon said:

http://twitter.com/AndrewHClark/status/1154078774775963649?s=19

Game. Set. Match.

And yet some Dems are still struggling with this concept today.

SFGbob

In the end, even Russian election interference, the ostensible purpose of the entire project, was outside Mueller’s expertise. When Rep. Greg Steube asked him if there was any evidence that a single American had changed their vote because of Russian meddling (the answer, incidentally, is no), Mueller responded that it was “beyond his purview.”

https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/24/the-mueller-testimony-was-a-disaster-for-democrats/#.XTihrVJsrzQ.twitter

HoustonHusky

http://www.twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1154024015075299331

DJDuck

I don’t think he is aware enough to know that his ass is being reamed. He needs to get back to his Memory Care Facility.

GDS

SFGbob said:

In the end, even Russian election interference, the ostensible purpose of the entire project, was outside Mueller’s expertise. When Rep. Greg Steube asked him if there was any evidence that a single American had changed their vote because of Russian meddling (the answer, incidentally, is no), Mueller responded that it was “beyond his purview.”

https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/24/the-mueller-testimony-was-a-disaster-for-democrats/#.XTihrVJsrzQ.twitter

Of course you have no idea if the answer to that question is no but hell don't let that stop you.

DJDuck

Now comes the hammer with the Horowitz IG Report and the AG’s Durham Report. That will be a State or Uber Schadenfreude.

RaceBannon

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

In the end, even Russian election interference, the ostensible purpose of the entire project, was outside Mueller’s expertise. When Rep. Greg Steube asked him if there was any evidence that a single American had changed their vote because of Russian meddling (the answer, incidentally, is no), Mueller responded that it was “beyond his purview.”

https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/24/the-mueller-testimony-was-a-disaster-for-democrats/#.XTihrVJsrzQ.twitter

Of course you have no idea if the answer to that question is no but hell don't let that stop you.

Is it yes?

SFGbob

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

In the end, even Russian election interference, the ostensible purpose of the entire project, was outside Mueller’s expertise. When Rep. Greg Steube asked him if there was any evidence that a single American had changed their vote because of Russian meddling (the answer, incidentally, is no), Mueller responded that it was “beyond his purview.”

https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/24/the-mueller-testimony-was-a-disaster-for-democrats/#.XTihrVJsrzQ.twitter

Of course you have no idea if the answer to that question is no but hell don't let that stop you.

I know the answer to that question - Zero

GDS

SFGbob said:

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

In the end, even Russian election interference, the ostensible purpose of the entire project, was outside Mueller’s expertise. When Rep. Greg Steube asked him if there was any evidence that a single American had changed their vote because of Russian meddling (the answer, incidentally, is no), Mueller responded that it was “beyond his purview.”

https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/24/the-mueller-testimony-was-a-disaster-for-democrats/#.XTihrVJsrzQ.twitter

Of course you have no idea if the answer to that question is no but hell don't let that stop you.

I know the answer to that question - Zero

No you don't. You have no idea why every single person in this country voted the way they voted.

SFGbob

I'll tell you what, the number of votes that were changed on account of Russian interference was less than the number of illegals who voted.

GDS

SFGbob said:

I'll tell you what, the number of votes that were changed on account of Russian interference was less than the number of illegals who voted.

so just more bullshit. got it.

RaceBannon

Scott desperately looks for a rabbit hole

UW_Doog_Bot

GDS said:

SFGbob said:

I'll tell you what, the number of votes that were changed on account of Russian interference was less than the number of illegals who voted.

so just more bullshit. got it.

Russell's teapot is an analogy, formulated by the philosopher Bertrand Russell (1872–1970), to illustrate that the philosophic burden of proof lies upon a person making unfalsifiable claims, rather than shifting the burden of disproof to others.

Russell specifically applied his analogy in the context of religion.[1] He wrote that if he were to assert, without offering proof, that a teapot, too small to be seen by telescopes, orbits the Sun somewhere in space between the Earth and Mars, he could not expect anyone to believe him solely because his assertion could not be proven wrong.

Russell's teapot is still invoked in discussions concerning the existence of God, and has had influence in various fields and media.