Creepy sociopath Jerold Nadler stalks Hope Hicks

DJDuck

Sociopath Jerold seems to gain a lot of pleasure by threatening other people hopefully engendering fear in his targets. The POS is a sick puppy.

Nattering Nabob Nadler is a prime example of the deranged Democrats that seem to just exist to make the lives of those that stand in their way to more power, a living hell.

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/creepy-nadler-stalks-hope-hicks-calls-her-in-to-testify-again-to-clarify-previous-statements-threatens-hicks-with-serious-consequences/

PurpleThrobber

In defense of stalking Hope Hicks....

USMChawk

Wood

HHusky

It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

Sledog

HHusky said:

It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.

HHusky

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.

Her answers seem decidedly Clintonesque (Bill) in light of the telephone records. You can relate.

PurpleThrobber

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.

Her answers seem decidedly Clintonesque (Bill) in light of the telephone records. You can relate.

She's giving hummers in the Oval Office?!?!

Hot Damn! Bring on the inquiry.

Sledog

HHusky said:

It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.

Her answers seem decidedly Clintonesque (Bill) in light of the telephone records. You can relate.

That depends on what your definition of "is" is.

HHusky

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.

Her answers seem decidedly Clintonesque (Bill) in light of the telephone records. You can relate.

That depends on what your definition of "is" is.

You’re making my point.

2001400ex

I thought this was about hope Solo. Then I remembered the beef already in the wam.

TurdBomber

PurpleThrobber said:

In defense of stalking Hope Hicks....

Crazy Eyes.

I prefer the focused, serious, craves it look.

Pitchfork51

Ugly dudes calling out hot chicks. Sad

PurpleThrobber

TurdBomber said:

PurpleThrobber said:

In defense of stalking Hope Hicks....

Crazy Eyes.

I prefer the focused, serious, craves it look.

WHYNOTBOTH.GIF !!!!