Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Creepy sociopath Jerold Nadler stalks Hope Hicks

DJDuck
DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
Sociopath Jerold seems to gain a lot of pleasure by threatening other people hopefully engendering fear in his targets. The POS is a sick puppy.

Nattering Nabob Nadler is a prime example of the deranged Democrats that seem to just exist to make the lives of those that stand in their way to more power, a living hell.

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/creepy-nadler-stalks-hope-hicks-calls-her-in-to-testify-again-to-clarify-previous-statements-threatens-hicks-with-serious-consequences/

«1

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 49,033 Standard Supporter


    In defense of stalking Hope Hicks....
  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,649
    It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 39,002 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

    You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,649
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

    You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.
    Her answers seem decidedly Clintonesque (Bill) in light of the telephone records. You can relate.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 49,033 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

    You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.
    Her answers seem decidedly Clintonesque (Bill) in light of the telephone records. You can relate.
    She's giving hummers in the Oval Office?!?!

    Hot Damn! Bring on the inquiry.

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 39,002 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

    You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

    You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.
    Her answers seem decidedly Clintonesque (Bill) in light of the telephone records. You can relate.
    That depends on what your definition of "is" is.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,649
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

    You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    It’s beyond reasonable to give her a chance to explain why she shouldn’t face a perjury referral.

    You already decided she's guilty maybe you should be running the show.
    Her answers seem decidedly Clintonesque (Bill) in light of the telephone records. You can relate.
    That depends on what your definition of "is" is.
    You’re making my point.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    I thought this was about hope Solo. Then I remembered the beef already in the wam.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter


    In defense of stalking Hope Hicks....

    Crazy Eyes.

    I prefer the focused, serious, craves it look.