OG 5 Reasons

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

MikeDamone said:

Original 5 reasons? Fuck off.

I started the 5 reasons ruse after it was posted as a serious post. Long before this. 2008, prior to opener at Oregon. Locker was QB.

Did you miss where I said I got it wrong?

UWhuskytskeet

Miley_Cyrus said:

Are we sure the original wasn’t on the Seattle Times message board/comment section?

That shit used to be lit during the Ty years. My memory is a bit hazy but I wanna say it was posted there.

I remember some guy on ST making a countdown of reasons why UW would win before the Oregon game that year. Probably the same dude.

RaceBannon

From my old and fading memory it was a UW2001 type user name and it was before the Oregon game in 2008

I think the 35-17 came from Bond Dawg before an Ohio State game if you can believe that

I think they got conflated but no one agrees with me so there's that

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

RaceBannon said:

From my old and fading memory it was a UW2001 type user name and it was before the Oregon game in 2008

I think the 35-17 came from Bond Dawg before an Ohio State game if you can believe that

I think they got conflated but no one agrees with me so there's that

The score part of, whether it was 35-17 (wrong answer) or 34-17 (correct answer) came from a prediction prior to either Oklahomo or OSU

dnc

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

RaceBannon said:

From my old and fading memory it was a UW2001 type user name and it was before the Oregon game in 2008

I think the 35-17 came from Bond Dawg before an Ohio State game if you can believe that

I think they got conflated but no one agrees with me so there's that

The score part of, whether it was 35-17 (wrong answer) or 34-17 (correct answer) came from a prediction prior to either Oklahomo or OSU

Boomer Sooner IIRC

RaceBannon

We agree on Oklahoma then for the score

MikeDamone

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

RaceBannon said:

From my old and fading memory it was a UW2001 type user name and it was before the Oregon game in 2008

I think the 35-17 came from Bond Dawg before an Ohio State game if you can believe that

I think they got conflated but no one agrees with me so there's that

The score part of, whether it was 35-17 (wrong answer) or 34-17 (correct answer) came from a prediction prior to either Oklahomo or OSU

All I know of it wasn’t for Damone it would have died in 2008. One of my proudest life's accomplishments.

longduckdong

Everyone remembers a funny post on random message board.

But 0 proof it existed

Fenderbender123

MikeDamone said:

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

RaceBannon said:

From my old and fading memory it was a UW2001 type user name and it was before the Oregon game in 2008

I think the 35-17 came from Bond Dawg before an Ohio State game if you can believe that

I think they got conflated but no one agrees with me so there's that

The score part of, whether it was 35-17 (wrong answer) or 34-17 (correct answer) came from a prediction prior to either Oklahomo or OSU

All I know of it wasn’t for Damone it would have died in 2008. One of my proudest life's accomplishments.

Should have at least been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. They were handing them out like crazy around that time.

ntxduck

MikeDamone said:

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

RaceBannon said:

From my old and fading memory it was a UW2001 type user name and it was before the Oregon game in 2008

I think the 35-17 came from Bond Dawg before an Ohio State game if you can believe that

I think they got conflated but no one agrees with me so there's that

The score part of, whether it was 35-17 (wrong answer) or 34-17 (correct answer) came from a prediction prior to either Oklahomo or OSU

All I know of it wasn’t for Damone it would have died in 2008. One of my proudest life's accomplishments.

It was definitely on educk in 2008 before the opener vs Oregon, and it was definitely 34-17. As a young, dumb high schooler, I’m pretty sure I went full SAC on the original poster

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

MikeDamone said:

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

RaceBannon said:

From my old and fading memory it was a UW2001 type user name and it was before the Oregon game in 2008

I think the 35-17 came from Bond Dawg before an Ohio State game if you can believe that

I think they got conflated but no one agrees with me so there's that

The score part of, whether it was 35-17 (wrong answer) or 34-17 (correct answer) came from a prediction prior to either Oklahomo or OSU

All I know of it wasn’t for Damone it would have died in 2008. One of my proudest life's accomplishments.

TYFYS.

If not for your sacrifices, I wouldn’t have had the opportunity to embarrass myself posting a screen shot from 2012 and think it was the original.

DerekJohnson

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

MikeDamone said:

Original 5 reasons? Fuck off.

I started the 5 reasons ruse after it was posted as a serious post. Long before this. 2008, prior to opener at Oregon. Locker was QB.

Did you miss where I said I got it wrong?

Damone is the one who originated 5 Reasons

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

DerekJohnson said:

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

MikeDamone said:

Original 5 reasons? Fuck off.

I started the 5 reasons ruse after it was posted as a serious post. Long before this. 2008, prior to opener at Oregon. Locker was QB.

Did you miss where I said I got it wrong?

Damone is the one who originated 5 Reasons

Damone originated the 5 reasons for every opponent but not the original 5 reasons.

Meek

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

DerekJohnson said:

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

MikeDamone said:

Original 5 reasons? Fuck off.

I started the 5 reasons ruse after it was posted as a serious post. Long before this. 2008, prior to opener at Oregon. Locker was QB.

Did you miss where I said I got it wrong?

Damone is the one who originated 5 Reasons

Damone originated the 5 reasons for every opponent but not the original 5 reasons.

Damone definitely gets credit for tweaking it (cinq raisons, etc) and taking it on the road. There has to be credit to those who would take it to teams we weren't playing but that had the same mascot names, though right? Those were fucking gold.

USMChawk

The 5 reasons is what brought me to this board. The first time I saw it I wondered who the doog poster was. After the third or fourth time I googled to see how many different places it was posted and here I am.

GrundleStiltzkin

USMChawk said:

The 5 reasons is what brought me to this board. The first time I saw it I wondered who the doog poster was. After the third or fourth time I googled to see how many different places it was posted and here I am.

HardcoreHusky is the headwaters of that river of filth, and Damone is its Dr. Livingstone.

GrundleStiltzkin

Boston College week one, Houston 4.

Pitchfork51

Meek said:

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

DerekJohnson said:

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

MikeDamone said:

Original 5 reasons? Fuck off.

I started the 5 reasons ruse after it was posted as a serious post. Long before this. 2008, prior to opener at Oregon. Locker was QB.

Did you miss where I said I got it wrong?

Damone is the one who originated 5 Reasons

Damone originated the 5 reasons for every opponent but not the original 5 reasons.

Damone definitely gets credit for tweaking it (cinq raisons, etc) and taking it on the road. There has to be credit to those who would take it to teams we weren't playing but that had the same mascot names, though right? Those were fucking gold.

Except fucking btp

That was a dark moment

HuskyJW

So when does 5 Reasons pop up in the Central Washington site before our first game?

GrundleStiltzkin

HuskyJW said:

So when does 5 Reasons pop up in the Central Washington site before our first game?

Here you go.