Border Patrol bitch slaps AOC
Comments
-
The Oracle of Aberdeen has issued his rulingcreepycoug said:
Yeah, I can see it that way. You don't need to convince me. You asked someone to explain how the image is racist. If the image is solely for humorous purposes, then I can live with it. The joke also works w/o referencing the family's color. I'm not sure it's that critical.SFGbob said:If you don't point out that the departing family is black and that the guy moving in is a white billionaire you don't have a fucking joke.
Like I said - I wouldn't be offended if it were proffered in the spirit of humor and levity. -
Going into the rotation.RaceBannon said:
The Oracle of Aberdeen has issued his rulingcreepycoug said:
Yeah, I can see it that way. You don't need to convince me. You asked someone to explain how the image is racist. If the image is solely for humorous purposes, then I can live with it. The joke also works w/o referencing the family's color. I'm not sure it's that critical.SFGbob said:If you don't point out that the departing family is black and that the guy moving in is a white billionaire you don't have a fucking joke.
Like I said - I wouldn't be offended if it were proffered in the spirit of humor and levity.
-
The joke doesn't work at all unless you mention each family's color. Actually, now that I look at it, Trump's color isn't mentioned.
First time in history a billionaire moves into public housing vacated by a family.
You don't even have a joke without the reference to race. I asked because Hondo and APAG are convinced the image is racist and unless you agree with them that it's racist you're a racist.
So congratulations, you're now a racist. -
About the same level of this (versions of which were floating around in Nov. 2008). Lowest common denominator jokes.

-
Yeah, I didn't say I thought the joke was funny, I just said that I didn't think it was racist.GrundleStiltzkin said:About the same level of this (versions of which were floating around in Nov. 2008). Lowest common denominator jokes.

-
That was on the desk of a politician during a fox news segment. Anyone who knows anything about TV. They scour the room before filming to make sure what's in there is appropriate. That was intentionally in there and intentionally on live TV on Fox news. Does that context help?creepycoug said:
Everyone understands the attempt at irony with the rich guy and public housing and the white house. That's obvious. An argument could be made that pointing out that the departing family was black was gratuitous. Like I said, it depends on how you define racism. I myself have a pretty high tolerance for that kind of humor, as evidenced by my participation in fucking around with the Cuban humor here. But that's because I also have some sense of the motivations behind the humor and I don't perceive anything nefarious in anyone's motivations. In a different context I might take it differently.SFGbob said:creepycoug said:
I'll take a shot: why was it important for the illustrator of that picture to point out the race of the family vacating the public housing into which the billionaire is moving? What does that have to do with the manufactured oddity of a rich guy moving into 'public housing'? Sometimes, especially in the area of propaganda, we attempt to undermine people, groups and things by associating them with something else that is universally viewed in a negative light. I think a lot of people would say that's what's going on in that picture. Black people = public housing. Even if it's true that a significant % of families living in public housing are black, if the inclusion of that information is not relevant to any obvious purpose of the picture, then you'd at least approach the illustrator's motives with skepticism. Racist? I guess it's all in how one defines racism.SFGbob said:
We can both sit here and trade personal insults. Next time you disagree with a claim I make, instead of being a Kunt and running away crying "racism" or some other twaddle why don't you try and back up your fucking mouth.allpurpleallgold said:
I think it’s interesting that you haven’t refuted that you’re borderline retarded.SFGbob said:
You're the one who is too big a pussy to refute anything I've said.allpurpleallgold said:SFGbob said:
Every single time you've even tried to engage with me I've handed you your ignorant ass. You now run and hide like a Kunt from me, while declaring how smart you are. How brave.allpurpleallgold said:
The concentration camps were designed to hold 1/5 the population and yet Trump changed policy to hold more people for longer knowing they wouldn’t be able to handle it.Bendintheriver said:
I can't access that article. Did it say that women were told to drink from the toilets? Did anyone say it was a Marriott down there?dhdawg said:So the Trump administration is lying?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/07/02/us/politics/border-center-migrant-detention.amp.html
What is amazing here is that liberals thought that they would torture the border patrol by denying them funding (BO actually cut their pay) and put pressure on the Trump admin via the court of public opinion that they should just open the borders and let the illegal dem votes in. They got an election wedge issue out of this as well and they have milked it until people are starting to understand what is really happening here and then lo and behold they provide funding. Your dem leaders didn't give two shits for those illegals. They used them as election issue pawns.
The border facilities were designed to provide 1/5 th of the population they currently have in most areas. Democrats knew that. They denied funding. It is the fault of democrats but people like you goose step to their bullshit and further their false message. Its like Antifa calling everyone else fascist. They are the fascist. This problem at the border was 100% democrat made and could easily have been avoided.
AOC going down and throwing her histrionics in front of everyone was just another piece of the liberal lie.
They’ve been spending $750 a day per kid and won’t give them soap but funding is the problem.
Which current president ran on the border? Which current president chose to cut taxes for the rich in his first two years while not getting his wall built so he could run on it again in 2020? Who’s making this an election issue?
Nearly everything you said is bullshit. You have proved yourself to be the dumbest poster on this board. And that’s saying something because people like @MikeDamone @SFGbob and @Sledog are borderline retarded.
You claimed that because I don't believe that this Meme is racist, that somehow is evidence I'm a racist.
Go ahead, explain to us all why that image is racist.
You're on the clock Kunt, go!
I take it from your post that you don't see it that way. Does that make you a racist? No, not on its face.
why was it important for the illustrator of that picture to point out the race of the family vacating the public housing into which the billionaire is moving?
Because it's a joke.
What does that have to do with the manufactured oddity of a rich guy moving into 'public housing'?
Because rich guys don't tend to live in public housing. That's part of the joke just like referring to the White House as "public housing" is also part of the joke.
How was Obama being undermined? It's a fucking joke. It's no different than if someone had tried to make an attempt at humor by talking about some drinking reference is an Irish President was being replaced by a Mormon President. It's called humor and the only reason you even feel it's racist is because it refers to black people and public housing.
Are blacks more likely to live in public housing than whites? The purpose of the picture was humor and obviously liberals don't have a sense of humor.
There is nothing racist about the image, and not every subject matter that mentions race is racist.
I don't know the context of that illustration. Is it a political meme on a hard right website or is it part of an SNL skit? It would make a difference to me. -
Lil lyin Bob. The picture posted on this thread for sure says "black family". Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:The joke doesn't work at all unless you mention each family's color. Actually, now that I look at it, Trump's color isn't mentioned.
First time in history a billionaire moves into public housing vacated by a family.
You don't even have a joke without the reference to race. I asked because Hondo and APAG are convinced the image is racist and unless you agree with them that it's racist you're a racist.
So congratulations, you're now a racist. -
It wasn't on any politicians desk you fucking liar and even if it were simply putting it on someone desk doesn't turn it into a racist image.2001400ex said:
That was on the desk of a politician during a fox news segment. Anyone who knows anything about TV. They scour the room before filming to make sure what's in there is appropriate. That was intentionally in there and intentionally on live TV on Fox news. Does that context help?creepycoug said:
Everyone understands the attempt at irony with the rich guy and public housing and the white house. That's obvious. An argument could be made that pointing out that the departing family was black was gratuitous. Like I said, it depends on how you define racism. I myself have a pretty high tolerance for that kind of humor, as evidenced by my participation in fucking around with the Cuban humor here. But that's because I also have some sense of the motivations behind the humor and I don't perceive anything nefarious in anyone's motivations. In a different context I might take it differently.SFGbob said:creepycoug said:
I'll take a shot: why was it important for the illustrator of that picture to point out the race of the family vacating the public housing into which the billionaire is moving? What does that have to do with the manufactured oddity of a rich guy moving into 'public housing'? Sometimes, especially in the area of propaganda, we attempt to undermine people, groups and things by associating them with something else that is universally viewed in a negative light. I think a lot of people would say that's what's going on in that picture. Black people = public housing. Even if it's true that a significant % of families living in public housing are black, if the inclusion of that information is not relevant to any obvious purpose of the picture, then you'd at least approach the illustrator's motives with skepticism. Racist? I guess it's all in how one defines racism.SFGbob said:
We can both sit here and trade personal insults. Next time you disagree with a claim I make, instead of being a Kunt and running away crying "racism" or some other twaddle why don't you try and back up your fucking mouth.allpurpleallgold said:
I think it’s interesting that you haven’t refuted that you’re borderline retarded.SFGbob said:
You're the one who is too big a pussy to refute anything I've said.allpurpleallgold said:SFGbob said:
Every single time you've even tried to engage with me I've handed you your ignorant ass. You now run and hide like a Kunt from me, while declaring how smart you are. How brave.allpurpleallgold said:
The concentration camps were designed to hold 1/5 the population and yet Trump changed policy to hold more people for longer knowing they wouldn’t be able to handle it.Bendintheriver said:
I can't access that article. Did it say that women were told to drink from the toilets? Did anyone say it was a Marriott down there?dhdawg said:So the Trump administration is lying?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/07/02/us/politics/border-center-migrant-detention.amp.html
What is amazing here is that liberals thought that they would torture the border patrol by denying them funding (BO actually cut their pay) and put pressure on the Trump admin via the court of public opinion that they should just open the borders and let the illegal dem votes in. They got an election wedge issue out of this as well and they have milked it until people are starting to understand what is really happening here and then lo and behold they provide funding. Your dem leaders didn't give two shits for those illegals. They used them as election issue pawns.
The border facilities were designed to provide 1/5 th of the population they currently have in most areas. Democrats knew that. They denied funding. It is the fault of democrats but people like you goose step to their bullshit and further their false message. Its like Antifa calling everyone else fascist. They are the fascist. This problem at the border was 100% democrat made and could easily have been avoided.
AOC going down and throwing her histrionics in front of everyone was just another piece of the liberal lie.
They’ve been spending $750 a day per kid and won’t give them soap but funding is the problem.
Which current president ran on the border? Which current president chose to cut taxes for the rich in his first two years while not getting his wall built so he could run on it again in 2020? Who’s making this an election issue?
Nearly everything you said is bullshit. You have proved yourself to be the dumbest poster on this board. And that’s saying something because people like @MikeDamone @SFGbob and @Sledog are borderline retarded.
You claimed that because I don't believe that this Meme is racist, that somehow is evidence I'm a racist.
Go ahead, explain to us all why that image is racist.
You're on the clock Kunt, go!
I take it from your post that you don't see it that way. Does that make you a racist? No, not on its face.
why was it important for the illustrator of that picture to point out the race of the family vacating the public housing into which the billionaire is moving?
Because it's a joke.
What does that have to do with the manufactured oddity of a rich guy moving into 'public housing'?
Because rich guys don't tend to live in public housing. That's part of the joke just like referring to the White House as "public housing" is also part of the joke.
How was Obama being undermined? It's a fucking joke. It's no different than if someone had tried to make an attempt at humor by talking about some drinking reference is an Irish President was being replaced by a Mormon President. It's called humor and the only reason you even feel it's racist is because it refers to black people and public housing.
Are blacks more likely to live in public housing than whites? The purpose of the picture was humor and obviously liberals don't have a sense of humor.
There is nothing racist about the image, and not every subject matter that mentions race is racist.
I don't know the context of that illustration. Is it a political meme on a hard right website or is it part of an SNL skit? It would make a difference to me.
The image made your snatch hurt for some reason and for that and that alone you claimed it was racist. -
What a dumbfuck Hondo is, the image was taken at a Trump Merchandise store in Arizona.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2018/10/15/arizona-donald-trump-store-show-low-merchandise-president-republican-politics/1367734002/ -
Stupid fucking Hondo can't read. I said Trump's skin color wasn't mentioned you fucking moron I never said Obama's wasn't mentioned.2001400ex said:
Lil lyin Bob. The picture posted on this thread for sure says "black family". Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:The joke doesn't work at all unless you mention each family's color. Actually, now that I look at it, Trump's color isn't mentioned.
First time in history a billionaire moves into public housing vacated by a family.
You don't even have a joke without the reference to race. I asked because Hondo and APAG are convinced the image is racist and unless you agree with them that it's racist you're a racist.
So congratulations, you're now a racist.



