Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Chris Petersen versus the Pac

dncdnc Member Posts: 56,758
in Hardcore Husky Board
Not my top guy, but I think this bored is too opposed to him.

Here's how he's fared versus the schools of the Pac12:

Arizona St: 1-0
Oregon: 2-0
Oregon St: 2-0
Utah: 2-0
Washington: 1-2

For whatever reason, UW has his number. But dude's 7-0 against other schools from the conference. There's a reason plenty of big schools have come after him.

I would definitely LIPO if we hired him. Far superior to the Nussmeier/Wilcox type options, IMO.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,181
    dnc said:

    I would definitely LIPO if we hired him. Far superior to the Nussmeier/Wilcox type options, IMO.

    I agree with your sentiment there - but we can do better than that. He would be an alright but underwhelming hire.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • priapismpriapism Member Posts: 2,134
    He wouldn't even go for SC, so I think he's waste of time to even discuss. He'll slowly decay at BS, as they become what they were before.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,758
    priapism said:

    He wouldn't even go for SC, so I think he's waste of time to even discuss. He'll slowly decay at BS, as they become what they were before.

    PatHadenFS picked Sark over him.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...

    Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,758
    topdawgnc said:

    Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...

    Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.

    There's definitely risk.

    OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.

    I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    dnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...

    Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.

    There's definitely risk.

    OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.

    I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.

    Cutcliffe > Petersen

    simple fact
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,758
    topdawgnc said:

    dnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...

    Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.

    There's definitely risk.

    OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.

    I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.

    Cutcliffe > Petersen

    simple fact
    You're talking to Ole Miss Superiority guy here.

    You're wrong.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • unfrozencavemanunfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303
    dnc said:

    priapism said:

    He wouldn't even go for SC, so I think he's waste of time to even discuss. He'll slowly decay at BS, as they become what they were before.

    PatHadenFS picked Sark over him.

    You sure about that? I thought CP bowed out, which caused the events to unfold as they did
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,758
    unfrozencaveman said:

    dnc said:

    priapism said:

    He wouldn't even go for SC, so I think he's waste of time to even discuss. He'll slowly decay at BS, as they become what they were before.

    PatHadenFS picked Sark over him.

    You sure about that? I thought CP bowed out, which caused the events to unfold as they did
    All signs point to Sark having been selected weeks ago.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • unfrozencavemanunfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303
    Alright not what I heard, but wait for the story to come out eventually
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Pat haden fs was playing chess, woodward on that checkers grind. Sark was the ruse, hth
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    topdawgnc said:

    dnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...

    Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.

    There's definitely risk.

    OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.

    I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.

    Cutcliffe > Petersen

    simple fact
    Tells me everything I need to know about everyone on this board right now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    topdawgnc said:

    dnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...

    Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.

    There's definitely risk.

    OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.

    I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.

    Cutcliffe > Petersen

    simple fact
    They both are shitty options
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    dnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    dnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...

    Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.

    There's definitely risk.

    OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.

    I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.

    Cutcliffe > Petersen

    simple fact
    You're talking to Ole Miss Superiority guy here.

    You're wrong.
    You mean the Ole Miss, where Cutcliffe won 60% of his games?

    Sark like records at Ole Miss ... and division championships at Duke > Boise State winning.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JuicyHawgCoogJuicyHawgCoog Member Posts: 122
    I would wager a shit load of money that Petersen, in the pac12 with the same teams, would be average. It's nice to spend 90% of you time ass raping teams and inflating your ego, until you stumble into a contest where your belief/ false respect alone is enough to keep you in the game. Put them in the PAC and he's just another coach.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DugtheDoogDugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
    topdawgnc said:

    Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...

    Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.

    Problem with that argument is it's fucking TCU. You don't think if Patterson bolted for A&M, etc, he'd have slightly more success? You can't recruit against Texas to TCU. You can't recruit against SC at Boise. You can at Washington.

    I'm not a big Peterson guy but I'm beginning to think the fucktards who want a coordinator might get their way. I'll take Peterson over a coordinator any day of the week. At least he's proven he can win. Deruyter hasn't proven he can win in a BCS conference. Neither has Bohl. But they've fucking won.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,758
    topdawgnc said:

    dnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    dnc said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Remember TCU against the world ... then the coach had to start playing that schedule week in and week out ... same with Utah ...

    Easy to out coach people when you have time ... but to do it week in and week out ... different story.

    There's definitely risk.

    OTOH, Urban Meyer and Brian Kelly.

    I'm not saying it's not a risk, it absolutely is. But it's a risk with legitimate upside, which is a hell of a lot better than David Cutcliffe.

    Cutcliffe > Petersen

    simple fact
    You're talking to Ole Miss Superiority guy here.

    You're wrong.
    You mean the Ole Miss, where Cutcliffe won 60% of his games?

    Sark like records at Ole Miss ... and division championships at Duke > Boise State winning.
    Meh. He was 25-23 in the SEC, and this was before the SEC was THE SEC. He had one good year when Eli was a senior and otherwise was 3-5 or 4-4 every season.

    And he doesn't have division championships at Duke. He has one division championship and is going to get raped in the title game. He's four games over .500 in his career with the pending plungering set to move that to 3.

    In 11 seasons as a head coach he has yet to win a conference championship.

    He might be worse than Sark.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    Dude ... It's Duke and Ole Miss ...

    You act like he took over Alabama

    Anywho ...

    I don't want Cutcliffe ... But I would take him over Petersen ...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,093 Standard Supporter
    topdawgnc said:

    Dude ... It's Duke and Ole Miss ...

    You act like he took over Alabama

    Anywho ...

    I don't want Cutcliffe ... But I would take him over Petersen ...

    But Ty took Stanford to a rose bowl. It's not like it was SC or UW. It was Stanford.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,181
    I would take Petersen over Cutcliffe.

    We need to get a list of all the names that have been thrown out and then find a webtool that allows us to rank everyone and compare and compile the results.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.