Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Bad news for the HondoBros
MikeDamone
Member Posts: 37,781
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
How is that bad news Mike?
Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. -
They certainly didn't want to succeed. Same thing you lying dumb ass. #1% is the new norm.2001400ex said:How is that bad news Mike?
Oh yeah. You think Trump haters want the economy to fail. Idiot. -
Is that good?MikeDamone said: -
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always. -
Liar2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always. -
El oh El.RaceBannon said:
Liar2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always. -
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying... -
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying... -
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. -
Moreover, the trains are running on time too.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying... -
Told ya. CD is madCirrhosisDawg said:
Moreover, the trains are running on time too.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying... -
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. -
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded. -
Hondo sounds desperate
And stupid -
Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.MikeDamone said:
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? -
Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.2001400ex said:
Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.MikeDamone said:
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? -
I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't.MikeDamone said:
Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.2001400ex said:
Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.MikeDamone said:
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? -
Your new source is lying to you.2001400ex said:
I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't.MikeDamone said:
Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.2001400ex said:
Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.MikeDamone said:
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem?
Taxes cut, employment up, wages up. HondoBros are mad. Mad that even though government receipts are up, they aren’t up “as a % of gpd”. JFC. You’re pathetic. -
@CirrhosisDawg is paying more
I'm paying less. Scoreboard
It was a sad day when workers got to keep more of their money. Hfs -
Yeah, how dare the tax cuts go to people that actually pay income taxes.2001400ex said:
I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't.MikeDamone said:
Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.2001400ex said:
Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.MikeDamone said:
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? -
The working class does pay income tax. Sometimes at higher marginal rates than the wealthy. STFU Bob.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare the tax cuts go to people that actually pay income taxes.2001400ex said:
I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't.MikeDamone said:
Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.2001400ex said:
Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.MikeDamone said:
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? -
The working class got a tax cut. Idiot.2001400ex said:
The working class does pay income tax. Sometimes at higher marginal rates than the wealthy. STFU Bob.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare the tax cuts go to people that actually pay income taxes.2001400ex said:
I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't.MikeDamone said:
Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.2001400ex said:
Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.MikeDamone said:
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? -
Hondo wants tax cuts to go to people who already don’t pay any income taxesMikeDamone said:
The working class got a tax cut. Idiot.2001400ex said:
The working class does pay income tax. Sometimes at higher marginal rates than the wealthy. STFU Bob.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare the tax cuts go to people that actually pay income taxes.2001400ex said:
I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't.MikeDamone said:
Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.2001400ex said:
Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.MikeDamone said:
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? -
Hondo do they tax your food stamps?SFGbob said:
Hondo wants tax cuts to go to people who already don’t pay any income taxesMikeDamone said:
The working class got a tax cut. Idiot.2001400ex said:
The working class does pay income tax. Sometimes at higher marginal rates than the wealthy. STFU Bob.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare the tax cuts go to people that actually pay income taxes.2001400ex said:
I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't.MikeDamone said:
Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.2001400ex said:
Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.MikeDamone said:
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? -
Agreed. Let’s stop saying “they should” then and implement tax policies grounded in reality.MikeDamone said:
But they won’t.2001400ex said:
Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.MikeDamone said:
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem? -
Yes I'm sure that $18 a month was meaningful. Good thing we won the war in China and the tariffs didn't increase prices.MikeDamone said:
The working class got a tax cut. Idiot.2001400ex said:
The working class does pay income tax. Sometimes at higher marginal rates than the wealthy. STFU Bob.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare the tax cuts go to people that actually pay income taxes.2001400ex said:
I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't.MikeDamone said:
Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.2001400ex said:
Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.MikeDamone said:
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem?
That being said. I'll tell you one last time. The vast majority of the tax cut went to the wealthy. A point you ignore. Idiot. -
A vast majority of the tax cut went to the people who pay a vast majority of the taxes. The horror
-
And as predicted, the wage growth and employment numbers anger you.2001400ex said:
Yes I'm sure that $18 a month was meaningful. Good thing we won the war in China and the tariffs didn't increase prices.MikeDamone said:
The working class got a tax cut. Idiot.2001400ex said:
The working class does pay income tax. Sometimes at higher marginal rates than the wealthy. STFU Bob.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare the tax cuts go to people that actually pay income taxes.2001400ex said:
I would agree with you if the majority of the tax cuts actually went to the working class. But they didn't.MikeDamone said:
Simple. Congress needs to stop increasing expenditures. JFC. How dumb are you? But they won’t. Meanwhile, I’ll be happy to see hardworking Americans making more money and keeping more of it. I know that pisses you off. Like I said, bad news for the HondoBros. You didn’t disappoint.2001400ex said:
Oh so the more productivity we have, the less per capita we need to spend to run the government? That's how it works now? I know you think there should be no taxes at all. Because the free market will shake everything out. But you can't be that Dumb.MikeDamone said:
If GDP increases, what it the justification that government receipts need to increase by the same? The actual dollar amount is up. They have more money than ever. That’s a fact. Why do you measure it as a % of GDP and not per capita? It should be the bigger the economy and prosperity, the less the government needs as a %. But you’re to stupid to think that through. Why do you feel the government is entitled to someone’s prosperity?2001400ex said:
The revenue as a percent of revenue has not barely fluctuated. That's another conservative bullshit talking point. You realize a 3% change is a huge fucking number, right?MikeDamone said:
Yes, I understand that revenue is at an all time high. I also understand that revenue as a % of GDP has fluctuated very little over the past several decades. I also understand that regular people have more money in to spend as they wish. I also understand that it upsets you the government isn’t taking that money to spend it more wisely (in your view) than the people who earned it.2001400ex said:
Yet revenues are lower as a percent of GDP. Do you understand the size of economy and revenues? Basic math is eluding you Mike.MikeDamone said:
So government revenue is at an all time high, unemployment lowest in decades, wages up....2001400ex said:
That's exactly what they were sold as. And they were sold as helping the budget because increased productivity would offset the lower taxes.MikeDamone said:
Neither has happened. As always.
Keep beating that retarded drum retard.
Keep lying...
Government needs to stop spending more than they take in. It makes Hondo made that people chose how to spend the money they earn. He thinks it all belongs to the government and they can decide how much people get to keep.
If the economy is doing well, why does the government need more a % of GDP? Your measurement is fucktarded.
Ok I'll play along tho. Revenues are growing slower than the economy. And expenditures are growing faster than the economy. What do you foresee Republicans doing about this problem?
That being said. I'll tell you one last time. The vast majority of the tax cut went to the wealthy. A point you ignore. Idiot.
Eat shit. Shit for brains.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/business/economy/income-tax-cut.amp.html
