Yella's Updated TBS Rankings based on BC's as % of commits

YellowSnow

Georgia - 84%
Alebama - 80%
Climpson - 77%
LSU 75%
Tennessee - 63%
Florida State Bus - 60%
Olkahoma - 57%
Notre Dame- 56%
tOSU - 52%
Florida - 52%
Washington - 50%
Texas A&M - 47%
Stanford - 45%
Flex Friday - 40%
Michigan - 45%
Miamuh - 33%
Pedo St - 26%

YellowSnow

I had to do this all by hand on my calculator. No fancy @UW_Doog_Bot algorithms here.

GrundleStiltzkin

Washington too low.

GreenRiverGatorz

What's the blue chip threshold?

YellowSnow

GreenRiverGatorz said:

What's the blue chip threshold?

247 composite (fuck off) 4 and 5 star 'croots.

PostGameOrangeSlices

Getting a kicker always fucks these up

bananasnblondes

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Getting a kicker always fucks these up

Wait til we have a punter and a long snapper

FireCohen

I thought BC was code for something else

YellowSnow

FirePete said:

I thought BC was code for something else

LebamDawg

OK @YellowSnow - who decided the BCs? average ranking top 300? All 4 stars? or what usually happens just some random number

YellowSnow

LebamDawg said:

OK @YellowSnow - who decided the BCs? average ranking top 300? All 4 stars? or what usually happens just some random number

247 Composite 4 and 5 stars are commonly referred to a blue chips.

Mad_Son

USC - 22%

Fenderbender123

YellowSnow said:

I had to do this all by hand on my calculator. No fancy @UW_Doog_Bot algorithms here.

That's weird. I ran the numbers and got a different result.

YellowSnow

Last year we were at 65% blue chips which was actually better than National Champ Climpson at 46%. We are recruiting now at a level which can get us to the title game.

YellowSnow

Fenderbender123 said:

YellowSnow said:

I had to do this all by hand on my calculator. No fancy @UW_Doog_Bot algorithms here.

That's weird. I ran the numbers and got a different result.

@TierbsHsotBoobs ?

digits

YellowSnow said:

Last year we were at 65% blue chips which was actually better than National Champ Climpson at 46%. We are recruiting now at a level which can get us to the title game.

Me thinks Petersen needs to win a big bowl game before we? can start talking about the NC. He's had three chances now and fucked the dog each time. It wasn't talent, all those games were winnable. It's on Petersen to figure it out, that's why he's paid the big bucks.

NorwegianHusky

digits said:

YellowSnow said:

Last year we were at 65% blue chips which was actually better than National Champ Climpson at 46%. We are recruiting now at a level which can get us to the title game.

Me thinks Petersen needs to win a big bowl game before we? can start talking about the NC. He's had three chances now and fucked the dog each time. It wasn't talent, all those games were winnable. It's on Petersen to figure it out, that's why he's paid the big bucks.

It was also talent. Particularly on offense.

digits

NorwegianHusky said:

digits said:

YellowSnow said:

Last year we were at 65% blue chips which was actually better than National Champ Climpson at 46%. We are recruiting now at a level which can get us to the title game.

Me thinks Petersen needs to win a big bowl game before we? can start talking about the NC. He's had three chances now and fucked the dog each time. It wasn't talent, all those games were winnable. It's on Petersen to figure it out, that's why he's paid the big bucks.

It was also talent. Particularly on offense.

Disagree.

UW_Doog_Bot

NorwegianHusky said:

digits said:

YellowSnow said:

Last year we were at 65% blue chips which was actually better than National Champ Climpson at 46%. We are recruiting now at a level which can get us to the title game.

Me thinks Petersen needs to win a big bowl game before we? can start talking about the NC. He's had three chances now and fucked the dog each time. It wasn't talent, all those games were winnable. It's on Petersen to figure it out, that's why he's paid the big bucks.

It was also talent. Particularly on offense.

He had his chances at better talent. He blew it or didn't prioritize it. So irregadless it's on peterman.

YellowSnow

digits said:

YellowSnow said:

Last year we were at 65% blue chips which was actually better than National Champ Climpson at 46%. We are recruiting now at a level which can get us to the title game.

Me thinks Petersen needs to win a big bowl game before we? can start talking about the NC. He's had three chances now and fucked the dog each time. It wasn't talent, all those games were winnable. It's on Petersen to figure it out, that's why he's paid the big bucks.

Pete's still gonna be a loser in big time bowl games during his UW tenure against top 10 teams until he's not. That's fair. But we got to those games with inferior top 25- 30 recruiting classes talent. Now we're in the top 10- 15 range. Pete's got 8.5 years to win his NT - this is how long it took Dabo - otherwise tick, tick, tick...

NorwegianHusky

digits said:

NorwegianHusky said:

digits said:

YellowSnow said:

Last year we were at 65% blue chips which was actually better than National Champ Climpson at 46%. We are recruiting now at a level which can get us to the title game.

Me thinks Petersen needs to win a big bowl game before we? can start talking about the NC. He's had three chances now and fucked the dog each time. It wasn't talent, all those games were winnable. It's on Petersen to figure it out, that's why he's paid the big bucks.

It was also talent. Particularly on offense.

Disagree.

Blow me.