Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
SNOPES VERIFIED!!!
Comments
-
So you will have two sources that are bullshit.creepycoug said:
I'll check in with Alex Jones.com instead.Bendintheriver said:Anyone who uses Snopes for "fact checking" is wasting their time.
That makes you a know nothing idiot.
Try thinking for yourself -
I'll wait to here from @snopes_fact_checker_dawg
-
lolBendintheriver said:
So you will have two sources that are bullshit.creepycoug said:
I'll check in with Alex Jones.com instead.Bendintheriver said:Anyone who uses Snopes for "fact checking" is wasting their time.
That makes you a know nothing idiot.
Try thinking for yourself
-
The Daily Mail Snopes Story And Fact Checking The Fact CheckersRaceBannon said:Who fact checks the fact checkers?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2016/12/22/the-daily-mail-snopes-story-and-fact-checking-the-fact-checkers/#620ff9f3227f -
Do You Trust Snopes? You Won’t After Reading This.
https://foodbabe.com/do-you-trust-snopes-you-wont-after-reading-how-they-work-with-monsanto-operatives/ -
I trust food babe.DJDuck said:Do You Trust Snopes? You Won’t After Reading This.
https://foodbabe.com/do-you-trust-snopes-you-wont-after-reading-how-they-work-with-monsanto-operatives/ -
You are better than using a logical fallacy to make a point.
From Real Clear politics:
“While Snopes deserves credit for its “just the facts, ma’am” approach to selecting its subjects, we have observed anecdotally that Snopes writers are in the habit of injecting editorial language or opinions into their fact checks. For instance, they called an unproven claim on knife crimes in London “heavy on Islam-blaming but light on evidence.” They labeled a questionable article on supposed “animal brothels” in Germany a “transparent attempt to spark fear and hatred.”
In evaluating a false conspiracy theory about Parkland shooting activist David Hogg, they added the extraneous commentary that “Hogg has been the target of a series of smears promoted by far-right blogs attempting to discredit him and his activist efforts for gun safety.” Elsewhere, Snopes exclaimed about the “increasingly hysterical tone” of Hogg’s “would-be smear campaigners.” And the site regularly calls the proprietor of a network of hoax news sites a “notorious purveyor of fake news who… operates a network of web sites including As American As Apple Pie and Freedum Junkshun, all of which claim to produce ‘satire.’” This is by no means an inclusive list. The reader need only pick a few Snopes pieces at random to find such charged language. “
-
I'm not saying you should Bing image search "Alex Jones hot" but I'm not saying you shouldn't either.....creepycoug said:
I'll check in with Alex Jones.com instead.Bendintheriver said:Anyone who uses Snopes for "fact checking" is wasting their time.
-
So should I or not?! God damn you throbber!PurpleThrobber said:
I'm not saying you should Bing image search "Alex Jones hot" but I'm not saying you shouldn't either.....creepycoug said:
I'll check in with Alex Jones.com instead.Bendintheriver said:Anyone who uses Snopes for "fact checking" is wasting their time.
-
I would think that the 1st duty of Fact checkers is getting your facts straight.
Snopes seems to have a problem with the truth, particularly with explaining photos.
Snopes, Fact-Checker For Facebook And Google, Botches Fact Check
https://dailycaller.com/2018/12/06/snopes-facebook-google-fact-check/
