Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

American Legion wins Cross case

2»

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,601 Founders Club
    Don't establish. Don't prohibit.

    That's a separation. Its a protection quite honestly

    State established religions are a way for the state to kill people with God's approval. No thanks

    People of all religions and atheists died in our wars. Public money for the Crescent star or whatever our Muslims friends use? I have a feeling there could be an issue

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 39,235 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    Separation of church and state doesn't mean what many think it means.

    Okay I'll bite. Worst case we get some classic Sledog one liners. Care to expand?
    I'll bite, Show me that line in the constitution.
    What they (the founders) meant was they was not going to be an official "state" religion in the US, akin to the Church of England or Roman Catholic Church in other places in Europe.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

    Crosses on memorials on government property gets a little murky, but I don't have an issue with it in this instance.
    Bingo! No state religion. That is it. Nothing else. All this I'm offended shoot needs to stop.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,168
    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    Separation of church and state doesn't mean what many think it means.

    Okay I'll bite. Worst case we get some classic Sledog one liners. Care to expand?
    I'll bite, Show me that line in the constitution.
    What they (the founders) meant was they was not going to be an official "state" religion in the US, akin to the Church of England or Roman Catholic Church in other places in Europe.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

    Crosses on memorials on government property gets a little murky, but I don't have an issue with it in this instance.
    Bingo! No state religion. That is it. Nothing else. All this I'm offended shoot needs to stop.
    So Supreme Court rulings and precedent set after 1789 don't mean anything?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 39,235 Standard Supporter
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    Separation of church and state doesn't mean what many think it means.

    Okay I'll bite. Worst case we get some classic Sledog one liners. Care to expand?
    I'll bite, Show me that line in the constitution.
    What they (the founders) meant was they was not going to be an official "state" religion in the US, akin to the Church of England or Roman Catholic Church in other places in Europe.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

    Crosses on memorials on government property gets a little murky, but I don't have an issue with it in this instance.
    Bingo! No state religion. That is it. Nothing else. All this I'm offended shoot needs to stop.
    So Supreme Court rulings and precedent set after 1789 don't mean anything?
    Hell no!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    RaceBannon said:

    Don't establish. Don't prohibit.

    That's a separation. Its a protection quite honestly

    State established religions are a way for the state to kill people with God's approval. No thanks

    People of all religions and atheists died in our wars. Public money for the Crescent star or whatever our Muslims friends use? I have a feeling there could be an issue

    The entire bill of rights is protection. People forget that. That’s what they like to forget.

    The constitution grants no rights.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,168
    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    Separation of church and state doesn't mean what many think it means.

    Okay I'll bite. Worst case we get some classic Sledog one liners. Care to expand?
    I'll bite, Show me that line in the constitution.
    What they (the founders) meant was they was not going to be an official "state" religion in the US, akin to the Church of England or Roman Catholic Church in other places in Europe.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

    Crosses on memorials on government property gets a little murky, but I don't have an issue with it in this instance.
    Bingo! No state religion. That is it. Nothing else. All this I'm offended shoot needs to stop.
    So Supreme Court rulings and precedent set after 1789 don't mean anything?
    Hell no!
    I've always enjoyed your honesty.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    Separation of church and state doesn't mean what many think it means.

    Okay I'll bite. Worst case we get some classic Sledog one liners. Care to expand?
    I'll bite, Show me that line in the constitution.
    What they (the founders) meant was they was not going to be an official "state" religion in the US, akin to the Church of England or Roman Catholic Church in other places in Europe.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

    Crosses on memorials on government property gets a little murky, but I don't have an issue with it in this instance.
    Bingo! No state religion. That is it. Nothing else. All this I'm offended shoot needs to stop.
    So Supreme Court rulings and precedent set after 1789 don't mean anything?
    Hell no!
    I've always enjoyed your honesty.
    You’ve always been one of my favorite posters.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,601 Founders Club
    MikeDamone said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    Separation of church and state doesn't mean what many think it means.

    Okay I'll bite. Worst case we get some classic Sledog one liners. Care to expand?
    I'll bite, Show me that line in the constitution.
    What they (the founders) meant was they was not going to be an official "state" religion in the US, akin to the Church of England or Roman Catholic Church in other places in Europe.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

    Crosses on memorials on government property gets a little murky, but I don't have an issue with it in this instance.
    Bingo! No state religion. That is it. Nothing else. All this I'm offended shoot needs to stop.
    So Supreme Court rulings and precedent set after 1789 don't mean anything?
    Hell no!
    I've always enjoyed your honesty.
    You’ve always been one of my favorite posters.
    Not a classy poster?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    RaceBannon said:

    MikeDamone said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    Separation of church and state doesn't mean what many think it means.

    Okay I'll bite. Worst case we get some classic Sledog one liners. Care to expand?
    I'll bite, Show me that line in the constitution.
    What they (the founders) meant was they was not going to be an official "state" religion in the US, akin to the Church of England or Roman Catholic Church in other places in Europe.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

    Crosses on memorials on government property gets a little murky, but I don't have an issue with it in this instance.
    Bingo! No state religion. That is it. Nothing else. All this I'm offended shoot needs to stop.
    So Supreme Court rulings and precedent set after 1789 don't mean anything?
    Hell no!
    I've always enjoyed your honesty.
    You’ve always been one of my favorite posters.
    Not a classy poster?
    Nebraska classy. Always well thought out posts.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 39,235 Standard Supporter
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Sledog said:

    Separation of church and state doesn't mean what many think it means.

    Okay I'll bite. Worst case we get some classic Sledog one liners. Care to expand?
    I'll bite, Show me that line in the constitution.
    What they (the founders) meant was they was not going to be an official "state" religion in the US, akin to the Church of England or Roman Catholic Church in other places in Europe.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

    Crosses on memorials on government property gets a little murky, but I don't have an issue with it in this instance.
    Bingo! No state religion. That is it. Nothing else. All this I'm offended shoot needs to stop.
    So Supreme Court rulings and precedent set after 1789 don't mean anything?
    Hell no!
    I've always enjoyed your honesty.
    The court ous during way too much legislating from the bench.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter