Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Burgess Owens at “”Reparations” hearing

DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
edited June 2019 in Tug Tavern
BOOM: Burgess Owens drops truth bomb, says DEMOCRATS need to pay reparations for slavery


https://www.conservativereview.com/news/boom-burgess-owens-drops-truth-bomb-says-democrats-need-pay-reparations-slavery/BOOM: Burgess Owens drops truth bomb, says DEMOCRATS need to pay reparations for slavery

“I used to be a Democrat until I did my history and found out the misery that that party brought to my race,” Owens said.

“I do believe in restitution. Let’s point to the party that was part of slavery, KKK, Jim Crow, that has killed over 40 percent of our black babies, 20 million of them. State of California, 75 percent of our black boys cannot pass standard reading and writing tests: a Democratic state,” Owens said. “So yes, let’s pay reparation. Let’s pay restitution. How about the Democratic Party pay for all the misery brought to my race?”


«13

Comments

  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    How about Democrats pay Reparations to the 360.000 families of Northern soldiers that died trying to free the slaves?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,764
    DJDuck said:

    How about Democrats pay Reparations to the 360.000 families of Northern soldiers that died trying to free the slaves?

    This is just bad history.
  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    edited June 2019
    Self-proclaimed ‘#1 Race Baiter’ Tariq Nasheed shows Burgess Owens what happens when you argue against reparations

    https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2019/06/19/self-proclaimed-1-race-baiter-tariq-nasheed-shows-burgess-owens-what-happens-when-you-argue-against-reparations/
  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    HHusky said:

    DJDuck said:

    How about Democrats pay Reparations to the 360.000 families of Northern soldiers that died trying to free the slaves?

    This is just bad history.
    You’re just as big a moron here as you were on the Shed Gentle Giant. So it wasn’t Democrats that instituted Jim Crow. Got it.

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,170 Standard Supporter
    DJDuck said:

    How about Democrats pay Reparations to the 360.000 families of Northern soldiers that died trying to free the slaves?




    Especially the Irish Mick Brigade descendants who are going after the British oppressor for reparations, too!

    #doubledipping

  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    History lesson edifying questions.

    What President desegregated Southern schools? What party did he belong to.

    Who literally stood in the way of troops trying to desecrate schools? What party did HE belong to?
  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    edited June 2019
    “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people (HHusky) will eventually come to believe it.”

    Sorry, But Bull Connor was a Democrat
    By Brian C. Joondeph



    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/04/sorry_but_bull_connor_was_a_democrat.html
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,803
    its almost as if parties are arbitrary bullshit
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,764
    edited June 2019
    Northern soldiers didn't go to war in 1861 in order to free the slaves, Deej. I guess quoting the passage I was referring to wasn't a big enough clue for you to post something responsive.
  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    edited June 2019
    You are ignorant of History Gentle Giant. You claim to be a lawyer. I have pointed out many times your narrow education has failed you in being able to analyze and process knowledge you were never focused on in your inadequate education. You are just full of crap again. Denial is not a River in Egypt moron.

    You’re a typical craven lib. Those uppity blacks that don’t believe the Democrat horseshit you do must be vilified and silenced before too many of “those people” understand the truth.😂😂

    By the way you failed to answer my questions. You haven’t changed much.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,764
    DJDuck said:

    You are ignorant of History Gentle Giant. You claim to be a lawyer. I have pointed out many times your narrow education has failed you in being able to analyze and process knowledge you were never focused on in your inadequate education. You are just full of crap again. Denial is not a River in Egypt moron.

    That's a whole lotta nothing.

    What's another name for the Northern forces, Deej? It's a clue to their motivation.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    Northern soldiers didn't go to war in 1861 in order to free the slaves, Deej. I guess quoting the passage I was referring to wasn't a big enough clue for you to post something responsive.

    They went because they were forced to.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,764

    HHusky said:

    Northern soldiers didn't go to war in 1861 in order to free the slaves, Deej. I guess quoting the passage I was referring to wasn't a big enough clue for you to post something responsive.

    They went because they were forced to.
    Some did. It was still a mostly volunteer army though.
  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    Another uppity Black booed by libs at the “Reparations” hearing.

    23-year-old black columnist says reparations would make young black people 'victims without their consent'

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/23-year-old-black-columnist-says-reparations-would-make-young-black-people-victims-without-their-consent
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Northern soldiers didn't go to war in 1861 in order to free the slaves, Deej. I guess quoting the passage I was referring to wasn't a big enough clue for you to post something responsive.

    They went because they were forced to.
    Some did. It was still a mostly volunteer army though.
    Yeah, but still.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,764
    DJDuck said:

    By the way you failed to answer my questions. You haven’t changed much.

    Your questions were irrelevant Deej. You haven't changed much.
  • DJDuckDJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    edited June 2019
    Whatever obfuscation you want to present to make the truth murky 600,000 northern troops gave their lives. They were putting down an insurrection that had at it’s core the goal preserving slavery.
    Should their ancestors pay Reparations.

    This is just another issue Democrats think is a road to power. If you are against Reparations you are a bigot.

    If one is to debate any issue one should debate the truth. I know that is impossible for liberals.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,764
    DJDuck said:

    Whatever obfuscation you want to present to make the truth murky 600,000 northern troops gave their lives. They were putting down an insurrection that had as it’s main goal as preserving slavery. Should their ancestors pay Reparations.

    This is just another issue Democrats think is a road to power. If you are against Reparations you are a bigot.

    If one is to debate any issue one should debate the truth. I know that is impossible for liberals.

    So you were lying before because you actually did know the truth?

    Given that Lincoln could never have sold the North on going to war in order to free the slaves, this is more than a trivial matter.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,850 Standard Supporter
    DJDuck said:

    Whatever obfuscation you want to present to make the truth murky 600,000 northern troops gave their lives. They were putting down an insurrection that had at it’s core the goal preserving slavery.
    Should their ancestors pay Reparations.

    This is just another issue Democrats think is a road to power. If you are against Reparations you are a bigot.

    If one is to debate any issue one should debate the truth. I know that is impossible for liberals.

    Tax democrats at 90%.
Sign In or Register to comment.