James Smith, 2020 3* DB, Bellflower (Bosco), CA (COMMITTED)
Comments
-
-
Lock has been sending dudes to the second levelNeighbor2972 said: -
Axe yourself whyFireCohen said:
Lock has been sending dudes to the second levelNeighbor2972 said: -
There is a worlddnc said:
Axe yourself whyFireCohen said:
Lock has been sending dudes to the second levelNeighbor2972 said: -
As alwaysFireCohen said:
There is a worlddnc said:
Axe yourself whyFireCohen said:
Lock has been sending dudes to the second levelNeighbor2972 said:
Don’t kill another joke by overusing, fuckstick. -
Neighbor2972 said:
I'll stand by Smith, he's got elite traits. I wish Ballz was here to die on this hill with me
Also I noticed this today, I don't know what good jump numbers are but these seem good
https://www.athletic.net/TrackAndField/Athlete.aspx?AID=11245536
I’ve decided I’m with you. He has the right type of frame and the right type of athleticism.
He started the year well but lost his spot. My guess is he just needs to learn the right technique. All the measurables but lacking the skill.
He’s a guy Lake identified relatively early, and Oregon wanted as well. He’s definitely not a plug and play guy like McDuffie or Byron.
But not every player you get needs to be. Some can be guys with high end measurables that you hope to teach and he gets it and by his junior year he starts showing up on the field.
-
Jordan Miller typeDoogCourics said:Neighbor2972 said:I'll stand by Smith, he's got elite traits. I wish Ballz was here to die on this hill with me
Also I noticed this today, I don't know what good jump numbers are but these seem good
https://www.athletic.net/TrackAndField/Athlete.aspx?AID=11245536
I’ve decided I’m with you. He has the right type of frame and the right type of athleticism.
He started the year well but lost his spot. My guess is he just needs to learn the right technique. All the measurables but lacking the skill.
He’s a guy Lake identified relatively early, and Oregon wanted as well. He’s definitely not a plug and play guy like McDuffie or Byron.
But not every player you get needs to be. Some can be guys with high end measurables that you hope to teach and he gets it and by his junior year he starts showing up on the field. -
It seemed like we were hearing amazing things about Miller for years before I ever saw him play. I think he just kept getting dinged up and missing time, and I missed the snaps he was in for.dnc said:
Jordan Miller typeDoogCourics said:Neighbor2972 said:I'll stand by Smith, he's got elite traits. I wish Ballz was here to die on this hill with me
Also I noticed this today, I don't know what good jump numbers are but these seem good
https://www.athletic.net/TrackAndField/Athlete.aspx?AID=11245536
I’ve decided I’m with you. He has the right type of frame and the right type of athleticism.
He started the year well but lost his spot. My guess is he just needs to learn the right technique. All the measurables but lacking the skill.
He’s a guy Lake identified relatively early, and Oregon wanted as well. He’s definitely not a plug and play guy like McDuffie or Byron.
But not every player you get needs to be. Some can be guys with high end measurables that you hope to teach and he gets it and by his junior year he starts showing up on the field.
I guess I point this out partly because Miller would have been so much better off if he had come in with the depth the way it is now as opposed to when he started out. The dings from being forced into action as a stick figure accumulated on him. He was good but didn't reach the potential he came in with. -
Agreedchuck said:
It seemed like we were hearing amazing things about Miller for years before I ever saw him play. I think he just kept getting dinged up and missing time, and I missed the snaps he was in for.dnc said:
Jordan Miller typeDoogCourics said:Neighbor2972 said:I'll stand by Smith, he's got elite traits. I wish Ballz was here to die on this hill with me
Also I noticed this today, I don't know what good jump numbers are but these seem good
https://www.athletic.net/TrackAndField/Athlete.aspx?AID=11245536
I’ve decided I’m with you. He has the right type of frame and the right type of athleticism.
He started the year well but lost his spot. My guess is he just needs to learn the right technique. All the measurables but lacking the skill.
He’s a guy Lake identified relatively early, and Oregon wanted as well. He’s definitely not a plug and play guy like McDuffie or Byron.
But not every player you get needs to be. Some can be guys with high end measurables that you hope to teach and he gets it and by his junior year he starts showing up on the field.
I guess I point this out partly because Miller would have been so much better off if he had come in with the depth the way it is now as opposed to when he started out. The dings from being forced into action as a stick figure accumulated on him. He was good but didn't reach the potential he came in with.
