https://foxnews.com/politics/geraldo-rivera-ag-barr-interview-should-have-comey-clapper-brennan-quaking-in-their-bootsFox News correspondent at-large Geraldo Rivera is warning several Obama-era intelligence chiefs that they should be worried after Attorney General William Barr aired his concerns about the origins of the Mueller investigation in a new interview.
During an appearance on "Fox & Friends" Friday, Rivera said it's clear Barr wants to get to the bottom of the Russia probe's origins and that he has "his target" on some of the biggest names associated with it.
"If I were James Comey right now or James Clapper right now or John Brennan right now, I would be quaking in my boots," Rivera said.
"Why? Because the attorney general of the United States has set his target on you,” he said.
Barr, in his own interview, said that in his research he has only been left with more questions than answers.
“I assumed I’d get answers when I went in, and I have not gotten answers that are, well, satisfactory," Barr said. "And, in fact, I probably have more questions, and that s
ome of the facts that, that I’ve learned don’t hang together with the official explanations of what happened.”In the real world we call that lying
Comments
JAN CRAWFORD: But it seems like you have a concern that there may have been a bias by top officials in the FBI as they looked at whether to launch and conduct this investigation?
WILLIAM BARR: Well it's hard to read some of the texts with and not feel that there was gross bias at work and they're appalling. And if the shoe were on the other--
JAN CRAWFORD: Appalling.
WILLIAM BARR: Those were appalling. And on their face they were very damning and I think if the shoe was on the other foot we could be hearing a lot about it. If those kinds of discussions were held you know when Obama first ran for office, people talking about Obama in those tones and suggesting that "Oh that he might be a Manchurian candidate for Islam or something like that." You know some wild accusations like that and you had that kind of discussion back and forth, you don't think we would be hearing a lot more about it?
I recommend the entire interview
He goes after the press and Mueller.
The explanation over why he released the 4 page summary and how Mueller's refusal to highlight the grand jury testimony so that it could be quickly redacted and the report released was also interesting. The summary fucked up the narrative that Mueller wanted to leak to the press.
My respect for Barr has grown, the guy has balls.
WILLIAM BARR: Well it might be legit under certain circumstances but a lot of that has to do with how good the evidence was at that point. And you know Mueller has spent two and half years and the fact is there is no evidence of a conspiracy. So it was bogus, this whole idea that the Trump was in cahoots with the Russians is bogus.
Gosh Hondo the pathological liar said it was a "documented fact."
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/ag-barr-sends-warning-to-deep-state-in-blunt-cbs-interview-govt-interference-in-elections-as-bad-as-foreign/
Now why didn't Mueller highlight that material? He knew Barr couldn't legally release the report without the information being removed. Mueller and his team wanted that time it would take for Barr to release the report to leak their narrative to the press. Barr's summary rat fucked that plan.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/fireworks-ag-barr-slams-muellers-legal-analysis-says-did-not-reflect-views-of-the-justice-department-video/
Why was their response to this "alarm" limited to "dangling a confidential informant in front of a peripheral player in the Trump campaign" if the threat was so alarming?
He isn't buying their bullshit story.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler said Friday “there certainly is” justification for Congress to begin impeachment proceedings against President Trump, but said it was critical for the American public to agree before launching the process.
During an interview on WNYC, Nadler, whose committee would lead impeachment proceedings, cautioned the move, noting the importance of having the American public on board first.
“Impeachment is a political act, and you cannot impeach a president if the American people will not support it,” said Nadler, D-N.Y. “The American people, right now, do not support it because they do not know the story. They don’t know the facts.”
Nadler added: “We have to get the facts out. We have to hold a series of hearings, we have to hold the investigations.”
Nadler also vowed to hold televised hearings to “have a dialogue with the American people so people can make informed decisions and know what’s going on.”
“It’s very important that [Special Counsel Robert Mueller], to a television audience and to the American people, state [his findings] and answer questions about it, even if there is no new information,” Nadler said.
I think we should have Mueller do a two year investigation to get the facts out!!!
Why is Nadler such a pussy. Let's get this impeachment party started!
https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2019/05/31/what-is-he-afraid-of-heres-proof-adam-schiff-is-very-on-edge-about-barrs-probe-into-origins-of-russia-collusion-hoax/
Drip drip drip?
Sounds like a Sark post game explanation of a UW loss
You interest in the truth and facts is so refreshing O'Keefed. What are you afraid of O'Keefed?