Reported by “Jet”- Lyin’ Joe Biden the Friend of Blacks

DJDuck

GDS said:

DJDuck said:

It’s from Jet Mr. Republican.

published 33 years ago....by current events you mean articles published 33 years ago....got it! Articles from 33 years ago probably don't help you're right.







They don't hurt either.

So I guess it won’t matter to Blacks WHAT LYIN’ JOE SAID 46 years ago.

Book: Joe Biden in 1973 Lectured Cleveland on What Is ‘Good for the Negro’

“Former Vice President Joe Biden lectured the City Club in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1973 about what he thought was “good for the Negro,” according to a new book from a prominent left-wing journalist.

The racially insensitive comments from Biden, a white man from Delaware who was at the time newly elected to the U.S. Senate, resurfaced, thanks to a new book from leftist journalist Ryan Grim of the Intercept. The book, We’ve Got People: From Jesse Jackson to AOC, the End of Big Money and the Rise of a Movement, has already landed a few other major blows, including on former President Barack Obama, regarding his “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal legacy, but this revelation about Biden’s torrid history with race–as told from the left–is particularly damning for the current Democrat 2020 presidential primary front runner.”

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/30/book-joe-biden-1973-lectured-cleveland-what-good-negro/

RaceBannon

DJDuck said:

GDS said:

DJDuck said:

It’s from Jet Mr. Republican.

published 33 years ago....by current events you mean articles published 33 years ago....got it! Articles from 33 years ago probably don't help you're right.







They don't hurt either.

So I guess it won’t matter to Blacks WHAT LYIN’ JOE SAID 46 years ago.

Book: Joe Biden in 1973 Lectured Cleveland on What Is ‘Good for the Negro’

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/30/book-joe-biden-1973-lectured-cleveland-what-good-negro/

It only matters if there is a R next to the name

I do think that Biden's democrat opponents can slaughter him on his past. The question is, will they?

DJDuck

Biden leads among Blacks in the primaries but is his support that strong to not lose a significant numbers of Blacks to Trump. Every article every bit of knowledge about two faced Biden that comes out chips away at Black support.

GDS

DJDuck said:

GDS said:

DJDuck said:

It’s from Jet Mr. Republican.

published 33 years ago....by current events you mean articles published 33 years ago....got it! Articles from 33 years ago probably don't help you're right.







They don't hurt either.

So I guess it won’t matter to Blacks WHAT LYIN’ JOE SAID 46 years ago.

Book: Joe Biden in 1973 Lectured Cleveland on What Is ‘Good for the Negro’

“Former Vice President Joe Biden lectured the City Club in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1973 about what he thought was “good for the Negro,” according to a new book from a prominent left-wing journalist.

The racially insensitive comments from Biden, a white man from Delaware who was at the time newly elected to the U.S. Senate, resurfaced, thanks to a new book from leftist journalist Ryan Grim of the Intercept. The book, We’ve Got People: From Jesse Jackson to AOC, the End of Big Money and the Rise of a Movement, has already landed a few other major blows, including on former President Barack Obama, regarding his “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal legacy, but this revelation about Biden’s torrid history with race–as told from the left–is particularly damning for the current Democrat 2020 presidential primary front runner.”

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/30/book-joe-biden-1973-lectured-cleveland-what-good-negro/

It might - but this Jet article from 33 years ago about a home Biden's dad purchased 50 years ago certainly won't.

I'd try and change the subject if I were you as well.

GDS

RaceBannon said:

So you're either too stupid to read the covenants when you buy the house or you don't care.

Which is it Scott?

City duck once told us that restrictive covenants in Pasadena in the 40's were holding Blacks down today.

They can be removed as a condition of the sale

Removing covenants can be time consuming and expensive. Do you think many people are going to risk losing out on the purchase of a home over obscure decades old covenants which can't be enforced anyway?

SFGbob

RaceBannon said:

So you're either too stupid to read the covenants when you buy the house or you don't care.

Which is it Scott?

City duck once told us that restrictive covenants in Pasadena in the 40's were holding Blacks down today.

They can be removed as a condition of the sale

Yep, City claimed that Pasadena RC's from the 40s had something to do with why black kids in SF today couldn't read at grade level.

RaceBannon

GDS said:

RaceBannon said:

So you're either too stupid to read the covenants when you buy the house or you don't care.

Which is it Scott?

City duck once told us that restrictive covenants in Pasadena in the 40's were holding Blacks down today.

They can be removed as a condition of the sale

Removing covenants can be time consuming and expensive. Do you think many people are going to risk losing out on the purchase of a home over obscure decades old covenants which can't be enforced anyway?

I certainly would

But I'm not a racist

Pitchfork51

Did race even have a father? Or is it sort of like a biblical adam and eve sorta deal

SFGbob

I recall it being very important that Rick Perry's family in the early 1960s had a hunting camping named "Niggerhead"

GDS

RaceBannon said:

GDS said:

RaceBannon said:

So you're either too stupid to read the covenants when you buy the house or you don't care.

Which is it Scott?

City duck once told us that restrictive covenants in Pasadena in the 40's were holding Blacks down today.

They can be removed as a condition of the sale

Removing covenants can be time consuming and expensive. Do you think many people are going to risk losing out on the purchase of a home over obscure decades old covenants which can't be enforced anyway?

I certainly would

But I'm not a racist

Good luck - before they changed the law in Oregon last year that meant contacting everyone in the neighborhood with the same covenant and getting a court judgement. Most people just move on since it hasn't been enforceable since 1948.