Meanwhile, the special counsel’s office this week issued a rare denial in response to questions about controversial author Michael Wolff’s upcoming book, “Siege: Trump Under Fire,” which reportedly claims that Mueller drew up an obstruction of justice indictment against President Trump.
According to The Guardian’s Edward Helmore, Wolff reports that Mueller’s office planned to charge the president with “influencing, obstructing or impeding a pending proceeding,” “tampering with a witness, victim or informant” and “retaliating against a witness, victim or informant” but eventually decided to “shelve” it. The Guardian reporter claimed he viewed the document, but the special counsel’s office denied it even exists.
“The documents described do not exist,” Mueller spokesman Peter Carr told Fox News on Tuesday.
The ex editor at Brietbart agrees that the Trump Jr meeting was treasonous. Yet Bob still thinks it didn't happen.
Lie.
I've never claimed the meeting didn't happen but a pathological liar just can't help themselves.
Btw, your source for this story is the author of a earlier book on Trump that was was widely discredited, and Mueller just discredited claims he made in his recent book. Of course you swallow like a bitch because that's what you do.
The ex editor at Brietbart thinks a lot of things.
So what?
BTW this author was caught lying in his first book and yesterday the Special Counsel said he is lying in this book
No wonder hondo likes him. Liars like liars
Race got his talking points memo this morning. Glad you presented them here.
even your trolling has grown weak and stale
Funny thing when race posts his talking points memo in the post right after this.
Whenever Hondo can't respond to what been said he pulls out this pathetic "talking points" response.
Or demands links... and of links are provided dismisses the source of its not the Washington post or CNN.
Hell I cut and pasted an article from the AP where it clearly cited the source. Hondo of course has nothing to say about the substance of what I quoted and made no refutation of the information that I'd quoted but demanded a link for no other reason than he is lightweight Kunt and had nothing else left to say.
Comments
So what?
BTW this author was caught lying in his first book and yesterday the Special Counsel said he is lying in this book
No wonder hondo likes him. Liars like liars
https://foxnews.com/politics/special-counsel-robert-mueller-to-make-statement-at-justice-dept-amid-pressure-to-testify
Meanwhile, the special counsel’s office this week issued a rare denial in response to questions about controversial author Michael Wolff’s upcoming book, “Siege: Trump Under Fire,” which reportedly claims that Mueller drew up an obstruction of justice indictment against President Trump.
According to The Guardian’s Edward Helmore, Wolff reports that Mueller’s office planned to charge the president with “influencing, obstructing or impeding a pending proceeding,” “tampering with a witness, victim or informant” and “retaliating against a witness, victim or informant” but eventually decided to “shelve” it. The Guardian reporter claimed he viewed the document, but the special counsel’s office denied it even exists.
“The documents described do not exist,” Mueller spokesman Peter Carr told Fox News on Tuesday.
Hondo the liar likes liars
This would imply that it was actually strong and fresh at some point. This we all know not to be true.
I've never claimed the meeting didn't happen but a pathological liar just can't help themselves.
Btw, your source for this story is the author of a earlier book on Trump that was was widely discredited, and Mueller just discredited claims he made in his recent book. Of course you swallow like a bitch because that's what you do.
Be specific
And include a link
And do it in context