I'm perfectly able to define it. I just find it interesting that you were so butt hurt over my statement and when asked why it's now because you're unsure of my definition of the word faith. First of all you're fucking lying. If you really were unclear about my definition of faith, why not just ask for it from the outset instead of quoting my words 5 times and refusing to say why you felt they were so beyond the pale.
A belief in creationism is a "faith" based belief. It's not a belief that is based in objective facts or science.
A belief that gender is a choice and societal construct is also a faith based belief based on neither facts or science.
This should have been clear to anyone making an honest reading of what I said, taken in the context in which I said it, but you're not being honest.
Certainly, research has shown that as many as 1 percent of the population is intersex, a medical condition denoting that an individual possesses anatomy characteristic of both sexes, such as a combination of vulvar and testicular tissue. Statistically speaking, however, this means that the vast majority of us fall into one category of sex or the other.
It therefore becomes a question of whether a statistically rare occurrence in the general population should be considered typical. An analogy that is commonly used to illustrate this is the fact that most of us have 10 fingers. There exist individuals who possess fewer or more than 10 digits on their hands, but this hasn’t called for a re-conceptualization of how many fingers a human being has.
Indeed, gender—whether we subjectively feel male or female—is biological, not a social construct. An extremely large and consistent body of scientific research has shown that gender is the result of prenatal hormone exposure, even in the case of intersex individuals, as opposed to adults and society imposing gendered norms on unsuspecting children from the moment they leave the womb.
You spent two years calling POTUS a traitor and fell for all of it. The leadership of the democrat party and their lap dog media engaged in a massive smear campaign
Both sides did not do that
Fuck off
Obama, the Muslim born in Kenya, would like a word. Benghazi and it's several investigations over a couple years also got a big belly laugh in the media room.
His brother says he was born there. Benghazi ain't quite over....
You spent two years calling POTUS a traitor and fell for all of it. The leadership of the democrat party and their lap dog media engaged in a massive smear campaign
Both sides did not do that
Fuck off
Obama, the Muslim born in Kenya, would like a word. Benghazi and it's several investigations over a couple years also got a big belly laugh in the media room.
His brother says he was born there.
And Obama talked about his Muslim faith. So why isn't it fair for someone to think he is a Muslim Hondo?
I'm perfectly able to define it. I just find it interesting that you were so butt hurt over my statement and when asked why it's now because you're unsure of my definition of the word faith. First of all you're fucking lying. If you really were unclear about my definition of faith, why not just ask for it from the outset instead of quoting my words 5 times and refusing to say why you felt they were so beyond the pale.
A belief in creationism is a "faith" based belief. It's not a belief that is based in objective facts or science.
A belief that gender is a choice and societal construct is also a faith based belief based on neither facts or science.
This should have been clear to anyone making an honest reading of what I said, taken in the context in which I said it, but you're not being honest.
One of those “informed” republicans I’ve heard so much about.
I see those poll numbers made your snatch hurt as well. Which number is larger? The number Republicans who thought Obama was a Muslim or the number of Rats who thought Trump colluded with the Russians?
Got to love how they so smugly dump on people who reject evolution when their thinking is every bit as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian and just as doctrinaire.
Got to love how you're such a fucking Kunt you can't even say what's so wrong with that statement. Yes, yes I know it made your snatch hurt. Now tell me why someone who thinks that gender is a choice and nothing more that societal construct is any less faith based in their thinking than someone who rejects evolution.
Run and hide Kunt.
Define faith.
It's the GND. Takes more faith for that than God. HTH
I'm perfectly able to define it. I just find it interesting that you were so butt hurt over my statement and when asked why it's now because you're unsure of my definition of the word faith. First of all you're fucking lying. If you really were unclear about my definition of faith, why not just ask for it from the outset instead of quoting my words 5 times and refusing to say why you felt they were so beyond the pale.
A belief in creationism is a "faith" based belief. It's not a belief that is based in objective facts or science.
A belief that gender is a choice and societal construct is also a faith based belief based on neither facts or science.
This should have been clear to anyone making an honest reading of what I said, taken in the context in which I said it, but you're not being honest.
I'm perfectly able to define it. I just find it interesting that you were so butt hurt over my statement and when asked why it's now because you're unsure of my definition of the word faith. First of all you're fucking lying. If you really were unclear about my definition of faith, why not just ask for it from the outset instead of quoting my words 5 times and refusing to say why you felt they were so beyond the pale.
A belief in creationism is a "faith" based belief. It's not a belief that is based in objective facts or science.
A belief that gender is a choice and societal construct is also a faith based belief based on neither facts or science.
This should have been clear to anyone making an honest reading of what I said, taken in the context in which I said it, but you're not being honest.
I'm perfectly able to define it. I just find it interesting that you were so butt hurt over my statement and when asked why it's now because you're unsure of my definition of the word faith. First of all you're fucking lying. If you really were unclear about my definition of faith, why not just ask for it from the outset instead of quoting my words 5 times and refusing to say why you felt they were so beyond the pale.
A belief in creationism is a "faith" based belief. It's not a belief that is based in objective facts or science.
A belief that gender is a choice and societal construct is also a faith based belief based on neither facts or science.
This should have been clear to anyone making an honest reading of what I said, taken in the context in which I said it, but you're not being honest.
I'm perfectly able to define it. I just find it interesting that you were so butt hurt over my statement and when asked why it's now because you're unsure of my definition of the word faith. First of all you're fucking lying. If you really were unclear about my definition of faith, why not just ask for it from the outset instead of quoting my words 5 times and refusing to say why you felt they were so beyond the pale.
A belief in creationism is a "faith" based belief. It's not a belief that is based in objective facts or science.
A belief that gender is a choice and societal construct is also a faith based belief based on neither facts or science.
This should have been clear to anyone making an honest reading of what I said, taken in the context in which I said it, but you're not being honest.
See, you have a faith based belief that gender is a choice.
Now how does that show I don't understand the definition of the word "faith?"
Oh I see, you’re quibbling on the definition of gender so you project that I’m quibbling on the definition of faith. Makes sense now.
Kunt, you claimed that I didn't understand the correct definition of "faith." You were quibbling asswhole.
I asked you to define it, you refused. Seems like a fair assumption given the circumstances.
Lie.
I did define it.
A belief in creationism is a "faith" based belief. It's not a belief that is based in objective facts or science.
A belief that gender is a choice and societal construct is also a faith based belief based on neither facts or science.
Lol. You’re actually insane.
Translation: I can't argue against anything you've said. So I'll claim that you don't know the definition of the word "faith" but I'll provided no evidence or examples in support of that claim. I'll then lie and claim you didn't define "faith" and that you "refused" to do so. When shown the evidence that I lied, I'll call you insane and run away.
You feel that gender is a choice. Just as evangelicals feel that creationism is true.
I'm perfectly able to define it. I just find it interesting that you were so butt hurt over my statement and when asked why it's now because you're unsure of my definition of the word faith. First of all you're fucking lying. If you really were unclear about my definition of faith, why not just ask for it from the outset instead of quoting my words 5 times and refusing to say why you felt they were so beyond the pale.
A belief in creationism is a "faith" based belief. It's not a belief that is based in objective facts or science.
A belief that gender is a choice and societal construct is also a faith based belief based on neither facts or science.
This should have been clear to anyone making an honest reading of what I said, taken in the context in which I said it, but you're not being honest.
Comments
Scientific research shows gender is not just a social construct
https://qz.com/1190996/scientific-research-shows-gender-is-not-just-a-social-construct/
Science Shows Sex Is Binary, Not a Spectrum
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/10/31/science_shows_sex_is_binary_not_a_spectrum_138506.html
Certainly, research has shown that as many as 1 percent of the population is intersex, a medical condition denoting that an individual possesses anatomy characteristic of both sexes, such as a combination of vulvar and testicular tissue. Statistically speaking, however, this means that the vast majority of us fall into one category of sex or the other.
It therefore becomes a question of whether a statistically rare occurrence in the general population should be considered typical. An analogy that is commonly used to illustrate this is the fact that most of us have 10 fingers. There exist individuals who possess fewer or more than 10 digits on their hands, but this hasn’t called for a re-conceptualization of how many fingers a human being has.
Indeed, gender—whether we subjectively feel male or female—is biological, not a social construct. An extremely large and consistent body of scientific research has shown that gender is the result of prenatal hormone exposure, even in the case of intersex individuals, as opposed to adults and society imposing gendered norms on unsuspecting children from the moment they leave the womb.
I did define it.
A belief in creationism is a "faith" based belief. It's not a belief that is based in objective facts or science.
A belief that gender is a choice and societal construct is also a faith based belief based on neither facts or science.
A belief that gender is a choice and societal construct is also a faith based belief based on neither facts or science.
Neither article made such an argument.
Neither article made such an argument.
Brilliant O'Keefed!!!!
You feel that gender is a choice. Just as evangelicals feel that creationism is true.