Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Fox New Pole: Voters favor increasing taxes on the rich

2»

Comments

  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,814
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
  • Options
    allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker First Anniversary
    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,178
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.
    And everyone can still evade the top rate by not earning enough.
  • Options
    GDSGDS Member Posts: 1,470
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.
    And everyone can still evade the top rate by not earning enough.
    What’s the tax rate if you lose 1.17 billion?
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,814
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.
    No, every citizen making less pays less of a percentage. HTH
  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,750
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited May 2019
    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    The Law. Maybe. But how about the advantages on the other side of the coin of being rich or born into it. In this world we all know that it isn’t what you know, it’s who you know. And by The Who, I mean the rich and powerful. Is it fair to the poor schlub that comes in 2nd for a sweet job or promotion that has more experience and is better fitted, loses to another dudes son/daughter who is golf buddies with the head of that department?

    Is it fair to the American people that most of our Congress actions are based on the wants of the people who donate most to their campaigns?

    Look I’m not goin Social here. I just happen to think that these people paying a little more to the masses instead of paying off their politician won’t hurt them. At all.
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,814
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited May 2019
    salemcoog said:

    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    The Law. Maybe. But how about the advantages on the other side of the coin of being rich or born into it. In this world we all know that it isn’t what you know, it’s who you know. And by The Who, I mean the rich and powerful. Is it fair to the poor schlub that comes in 2nd for a sweet job or promotion that has more experience and is better fitted, loses to another dudes son/daughter who is golf buddies with the head of that department?

    Is it fair to the American people that most of our Congress actions are based on the wants of the people who donate most to their campaigns?

    Look I’m not goin Social here. I just happen to think that these people paying a little more to the masses instead of paying off their politician won’t hurt them. At all.
    Punishing success isn't the answer either. High taxes isn't going to stop "who you know" either.

    Congress is another story. Term limits! Making our elected officials millionaires isn't what they are there for.
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited May 2019
    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    You used the term “fair”, slappy dick
  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,750
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    You used the term “fair”, slappy dick
    Whoooooooossssshhhhh!!!!!
  • Options
    MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.
    Guilty white socialist from Mercer Island @allpurpleallgold has spoken.

    Please continue to tell me how my family should think and vote! It shows you CARE!

    Or, is your white isolated privilege showing again?

  • Options
    KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,750
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    MisterEm said:

    Sledog said:

    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Welp. Liberal SJW Fuck thinks Billionaires should be abolished, so there’s that. I do agree agree that a marginal tax rate of 45% would be fair for those that earn more than $10MM though.

    Why is that “fair”?
    What is the definition of fair?



    Same for all. I still say it's an unequal application of the law.
    Good news! If the top marginal tax rate is 45% or 70% or even 90% it’s the same for all.
    Guilty white socialist from Mercer Island @allpurpleallgold has spoken.

    Please continue to tell me how my family should think and vote! It shows you CARE!

    Or, is your white isolated privilege showing again?

    Mercer Island??? Those guys are fags. I remember back when Shadle Park (Spokane) beat them in B-ball for the State Natty and everyone in the Green and Gold feared for their life trying to get out of there. Many threats of “you’ll never work in this town again” thrown out.
Sign In or Register to comment.